Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply Pro-Life/Pro-Choice Discussion
Narrowmindedness Goto Page: 1 2 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Tiger of the Fire

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:19 pm


The point didn't go over so well. Restarting the topic in a new thread.
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:24 pm


You made a whole thread just for me ^_^

I'm talking about the british conservative party here. It would have been nice of you to remember that. The politics here is different from the ones in the US. Also it is traditional to disagree with the party you don't vote for, otherwise there would be little point in voting at all and everyone would sit around agreeing, which is about as likley as me parting the oceans with the force of my mind 4laugh

Also, if you read what I wrote, you will notice that I never said that I wasn't discriminating against people I strongly disagree with. The intelligent reader will note that this was the entire purpose of my choosing someone whom I did agree with, as most people do. This reader will then go on to notice the section where I said Conservative OR narrow minded.

Would you want to give a child you may have put up for adoption to a family who strongly believed in abortion if the person is young or unmarried? Does that make you a narrow minded so and so? It makes you subjective and human. Like everyone else.

Anardana

Magnetic Dabbler

9,750 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Treasure Hunter 100
  • Tycoon 200

Tiger of the Fire

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:32 pm


Anardana
You made a whole thread just for me ^_^

I'm talking about the british conservative party here. It would have been nice of you to remember that. The politics here is different from the ones in the US. Also it is traditional to disagree with the party you don't vote for, otherwise there would be little point in voting at all and everyone would sit around agreeing, which is about as likley as me parting the oceans with the force of my mind 4laugh

Also, if you read what I wrote, you will notice that I never said that I wasn't discriminating against people I strongly disagree with. The intelligent reader will note that this was the entire purpose of my choosing someone whom I did agree with, as most people do.

Would you want to give a child you may have put up for adoption to a family who strongly believed in abortion if the person is young or unmarried? Does that make you a narrow minded so and so? It makes you subjective and human. Like everyone else.


As you came off as narrow minded =/, the point of your thread failed.

The point of my thread was not to compare countries conservative politics (An intelligent reader would have noticed that wink ), it was a generalization of all conservative politics. I also asked to discuss HOW conservatives, any where, are narrow and closed minded, and how saying they are, isn't, in and of itself narrow minded.

Aside form that being a red herring and a poorly made Scarcrow, I'll chase it any ways. Yes, if I had to, I would, so long as those people raised my child properly, and provided for it, I have no problem with my own sun or daughter taking a diffrent political view point then me. Besides, theres a 50% chance that they'll eventually share my view point instead of theirs. Takign their politicle view point into mind when they very well could be able to do better justice then me isn't subjective, it's narrow minded

Now please discuss.
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:35 pm


Tiger of the Fire
Anardana
You made a whole thread just for me ^_^

I'm talking about the british conservative party here. It would have been nice of you to remember that. The politics here is different from the ones in the US. Also it is traditional to disagree with the party you don't vote for, otherwise there would be little point in voting at all and everyone would sit around agreeing, which is about as likley as me parting the oceans with the force of my mind 4laugh

Also, if you read what I wrote, you will notice that I never said that I wasn't discriminating against people I strongly disagree with. The intelligent reader will note that this was the entire purpose of my choosing someone whom I did agree with, as most people do.

Would you want to give a child you may have put up for adoption to a family who strongly believed in abortion if the person is young or unmarried? Does that make you a narrow minded so and so? It makes you subjective and human. Like everyone else.


As you came off as narrow minded =/, the point of your thread failed.

The point of my thread was not to compare countries conservative politics (An intelligent reader would have noticed that wink ), it was a generalization of all conservative politics. I also asked to discuss HOW conservatives, any where, are narrow and closed minded, and how saying they are, isn't, in and of itself narrow minded.

Now please discuss.


I was merely pointing out how your decision to create an entire thread as an underhanded attack on my opinions had apparently overlooked the very point I was making.

The point of this thread would come across better if you wrote and opening post explaining your ideas rather than veiled mudslinging at my views. Please remove this insult, there is no reason for me to tolerate your unnecessarily hostile behaviour.

Thankyou.

Anardana

Magnetic Dabbler

9,750 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Treasure Hunter 100
  • Tycoon 200

Tiger of the Fire

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:42 pm


Anardana
Tiger of the Fire
Anardana
You made a whole thread just for me ^_^

I'm talking about the british conservative party here. It would have been nice of you to remember that. The politics here is different from the ones in the US. Also it is traditional to disagree with the party you don't vote for, otherwise there would be little point in voting at all and everyone would sit around agreeing, which is about as likley as me parting the oceans with the force of my mind 4laugh

Also, if you read what I wrote, you will notice that I never said that I wasn't discriminating against people I strongly disagree with. The intelligent reader will note that this was the entire purpose of my choosing someone whom I did agree with, as most people do.

Would you want to give a child you may have put up for adoption to a family who strongly believed in abortion if the person is young or unmarried? Does that make you a narrow minded so and so? It makes you subjective and human. Like everyone else.


As you came off as narrow minded =/, the point of your thread failed.

The point of my thread was not to compare countries conservative politics (An intelligent reader would have noticed that wink ), it was a generalization of all conservative politics. I also asked to discuss HOW conservatives, any where, are narrow and closed minded, and how saying they are, isn't, in and of itself narrow minded.

Now please discuss.


I was merely pointing out how your decision to create an entire thread as an underhanded attack on my opinions had apparently overlooked the very point I was making.

The point of this thread would come across better if you wrote and opening post explaining your ideas rather than veiled mudslinging at my views. Please remove this insult or I will be forced to make a complaint against your unnecessarily hostile attitude towards me.

Thankyou.


My topic is a lagitamet one, I talked with another mod about it before postign this thread and they saw no problem with it And there was no mudslingin in my posts, that came form all of yours.

Now, you have two options. You can sit down and actually discuss the topic, or I can place you on my ignore list for the duration of the thread if you have nothing to say related to the main topic.

Whats the topic? How are conservatives, republicans, and any one who disagrees with you ("You" being metaphorical, not literal), are narrow minded. I'm allowed to ask this. So don't flatter your self by thinking just because I quoted you that its aimed soley at you.
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:47 pm


I don't understand why this needed to be made into its own thread. It just seems . . . hostile. I mean really, what exactly is the point of this thread apart from, "And I think what Anaradana said is awful!"? Because I'm not seeing it.

Anyway, I'm going to try to give this thread a topic apart from Anardana and say that I don't see the problem with seeking to adopt your child out to people who you believe will be accepting of you. For example, I'm an atheist. Christians on the whole are not particularly accepting of my beliefs. Yes, there are exceptions, but my experience tells me that even Christians that I can be friends with often think I'm going to hell. I don't think it would be wrong of me to want to give my child to someone who wouldn't tell my child that their mother is damned for all eternity. I also don't think it's wrong to adopt your child out to someone who shares certain core values. For example, I would never want to give my child to a white supremacist simply because I wouldn't want my child to be raised by people who would tell him/her that whites are the best. I don't see what the problem with this is.

ShadowIce


lymelady
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:48 pm


I believe it was an attempt to keep from derailing the other thread.

Edit: I believe this because I asked him not to derail the thread, so please, take it up with me, not with Tiger. It's not meant as a sling at any individual. If it was, it probably would have been posted in the extended discussion subforum where Anardana would be unable to defend her statement.

I'm curious about a few things though.

It sounds like you'd rather have an abortion if your options were abortion or your child being raised by republicans or conservatives. If you, admittedly, discriminate against people you disagree with strongly, why would you want your child raised by people who will raise them not to do that?

If I'm misunderstanding, please let me know, but the sentiment of, "I'd rather my child not exist than be conservative" stings a bit, especially the implication that Republicans and conservatives are unlikely to raise children to be open-minded.
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:53 pm


ShadowIce
I don't understand why this needed to be made into its own thread. It just seems . . . hostile. I mean really, what exactly is the point of this thread apart from, "And I think what Anaradana said is awful!" I would have liked it if this discussion could have remained in the thread that Anardana posted her comment in. But it didn't, so . . .

Anyway, I'm going to try to give this thread a topic apart from Anardana and say that I don't see the problem with seeking to adopt your child out to people who you believe will be accepting of you. For example, I'm an atheist. Christians on the whole are not particularly accepting of my beliefs. Yes, there are exceptions, but my experience tells me that even Christians that I can be friends with often think I'm going to hell. I don't think it would be wrong of me to want to give my child to someone who wouldn't tell my child that their mother is damned for all eternity. I also don't think it's wrong to adopt your child out to someone who shares certain core values. For example, I would never want to give my child to a white supremacist simply because I wouldn't want my child to be raised by people who would tell him/her that whites are the best. I don't see what the problem with this is.


I was specifically told to make this a new thread by an assisting mod, as the question was unrelated to the thread the quoted person's post was in. And i know personly Waters likes to keep her threads on topic.

The point of this thread isn't about adoption and people who agree with you. And ita not about picking on Aradana. The only reason why some one would think it is, is because she's the quoted one. You're missing that.

This thread is solely about people who disagree with you and why you may have a problem with them to the point you call them closed minded (if you ever get that far)

Thanks for posting something slightly relevant though. I appreciate it. No joke. 3nodding

Tiger of the Fire


ShadowIce

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:01 pm


Tiger of the Fire
I was specifically told to make this a new thread by an assisting mod, as the question was unrelated to the thread the quoted person's post was in. And i know personly Waters likes to keep her threads on topic.

The point of this thread isn't about adoption and people who agree with you. And ita not about picking on Aradana. The only reason why some one would think it is, is because she's the quoted one. You're missing that.

This thread is solely about people who disagree with you and why you may have a problem with them to the point you call them closed minded (if you ever get that far)

Thanks for posting something slightly relevant though. I appreciate it. No joke. 3nodding

All righty, then I'll try this again. ninja

I don't call people close minded. Ever. I think it's just intensely counter productive. No one is going to agree with me more because I called them names. In fact, they might be even less inclined to listen to me than before. Furthermore, people can agree with me on an issue and still be utterly close minded. My father is an example of someone who agrees with me on many issues and is still profoundly close minded.

That being said, I still have conversations about close minded people, because I think close mindedness is something that we need to address.
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:04 pm


lymelady
I believe it was an attempt to keep from derailing the other thread.

I'm curious about a few things though.

It sounds like you'd rather have an abortion if your options were abortion or your child being raised by republicans or conservatives. If you, admittedly, discriminate against people you disagree with strongly, why would you want your child raised by people who will raise them not to do that?

If I'm misunderstanding, please let me know, but the sentiment of, "I'd rather my child not exist than be conservative" stings a bit, especially the implication that Republicans and conservatives are unlikely to raise children to be open-minded.


To the first question - I might, I don't know. As I have mentioned I am in two minds about abortion which is why I was hoping for polite and mature discussion in this guild to help me decide where I stood. People who aren't closed minded can still discriminate because even though some people like to think they are without prejudice there are very few people in this world who are not riddled with prejudice. It is natural. If I put a child up for adoption I would give it to a liberal monarchistic gay couple if I could, but it doesn't mean I wouldn't consider anyone else, It would just take more thought. Raising someone to be broad minded is not the same as raising them to agree with everything. I am polite to the vast majority of people I meet unless they are persistently rude, but that does not mean that I would want to perpetuate their beliefs which I disagree with by handing them a child to raise with their views. It's not so much as discriminating as choosing who I think will luck after it best. My opinion will naturally be biased towards my own views but that doesn't mean I'm discriminating against the others, I'm not refusing them anything they are entitled to or refusing to speak to them or in some way persecuting them, I just wouldn't want to give my offspring to them.

To the second - The implication that Republicans and Conservatives might raise their children to be narrow-minded was not there by my intention but I can see where you got the notion after the OP although apparently my being offended at his hostility means nothing. Republicans in this country are not a political party so much as they are a view on the head of state. As our head of state and government are separate, being a republican simply means you want an elected head of state. This is unlikely to have an affect on their political levels of open or closed mindedness as there are no "official" republican policies due to there being no republican party.

Conservatives in the UK are loved or despised depending on where you live. I live in the north of England. This is where the coal mines were situated until the conservatives closed them all down because it was cheaper to buy coal from abroad. This left most villages and towns in the North with no income as there were literally almost no other industries in the North at that time. When the miners struck the conservative leader ordered the police to break the strike in any way possible. The police turned the leaders of the strikes upside down into the burning barrels of oil they were using to keep themselves warm, killing them. The party and leader have never apologised for ordering this and since then there are towns in England where Jesus could be running for the conservatives as MP and he wouldn't get in. I will as such always hold a grudge against the conservatives because they have maintained what they did was ok to this day and my family were badly affected during that time. If I dislike them with a good reason I don't see that as discimination.

Anardana

Magnetic Dabbler

9,750 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Treasure Hunter 100
  • Tycoon 200

WatersMoon110
Crew

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:06 pm


Since Waters derails her own threads, more often than not, it's more about her great like of new threads.

Anyway, I think that she was talking about wanting any child she gave up for adoption to be raised like she would raise it, which I feel is understandable. There are plenty (and by "plenty" I mean "two that I've seen on the internet") of adoption agencies that offer information like the religion of the potential adoptive families, so that birth parents can better choose someone they want to be raising their child.

Why is it that it was fine for me to say that I would want to give a child up to a gay couple and not for her to say it? Because I didn't say that I believe conservatives to be narrow minded? (I do think that some of them are, but only those who are against things like Gay Marriage - which not all conservatives are). There are narrow minded conservatives and narrow minded liberals, and plenty of people of both political persuasions who are open minded - it just depends on the person.
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:07 pm


ShadowIce
Tiger of the Fire
I was specifically told to make this a new thread by an assisting mod, as the question was unrelated to the thread the quoted person's post was in. And i know personly Waters likes to keep her threads on topic.

The point of this thread isn't about adoption and people who agree with you. And ita not about picking on Aradana. The only reason why some one would think it is, is because she's the quoted one. You're missing that.

This thread is solely about people who disagree with you and why you may have a problem with them to the point you call them closed minded (if you ever get that far)

Thanks for posting something slightly relevant though. I appreciate it. No joke. 3nodding

All righty, then I'll try this again. ninja

I don't call people close minded. Ever. I think it's just intensely counter productive. No one is going to agree with me more because I called them names. In fact, they might be even less inclined to listen to me than before. Furthermore, people can agree with me on an issue and still be utterly close minded. My father is an example of someone who agrees with me on many issues and is still profoundly close minded.

That being said, I still have conversations about close minded people, because I think close mindedness is something that we need to address.


Thats more like it. But now, I'm going to have to ask what you mean by closed minded? Do you mean he sticks to his guns? In that he may agree with some of your points, but stays to what he sees as right? Or does he agree with you on some points, but blows off every one he dosen't agree with?

Tiger of the Fire


Anardana

Magnetic Dabbler

9,750 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Treasure Hunter 100
  • Tycoon 200
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:08 pm


lymelady
I believe it was an attempt to keep from derailing the other thread.

Edit: I believe this because I asked him not to derail the thread, so please, take it up with me, not with Tiger. It's not meant as a sling at any individual. If it was, it probably would have been posted in the extended discussion subforum where Anardana would be unable to defend her statement.



I still think it was blatantly rude to quote my post in there when there was nothing stopping him writing a purposeful OP himself on the subject. As far as I can see my quote in there holds no purpose other than as an example of what he disagrees with.
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:13 pm


Anardana
Conservatives in the UK are loved or despised depending on where you live. I live in the north of England. This is where the coal mines were situated until the conservatives closed them all down because it was cheaper to buy coal from abroad. This left most villages and towns in the North with no income as there were literally almost no other industries in the North at that time. When the miners struck the conservative leader ordered the police to break the strike in any way possible. The police turned the leaders of the strikes upside down into the burning barrels of oil they were using to keep themselves warm, killing them. The party and leader have never apologised for ordering this and since then there are towns in England where Jesus could be running for the conservatives as MP and he wouldn't get in.
Wow - that's a horrible thing to have happened.
Anardana
I will as such always hold a grudge against the conservatives because they have maintained what they did was ok to this day and my family were badly affected during that time. If I dislike them with a good reason I don't see that as discimination.
I find that understandable, but somewhat irrational (no offense meant). I can see where you would hold a grudge, but obviously most conservatives weren't involved with that action - it's a little like hating all chickens because one attacked you when you were little (which took me years and years to get over). It was only a few people who made that horrible, horrible choice - and it is unlikely that any of them would ever be a potential adoptive family.

WatersMoon110
Crew


Anardana

Magnetic Dabbler

9,750 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Treasure Hunter 100
  • Tycoon 200
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:14 pm


I don't think that an entire group of people can be labeled closed minded, just some of them.

It is natural to have negative opinions about the views of those on the opposite side of a discussion, otherwise there would be no discussion or debate.

I accept for example that some people believe it is ok to murder an entire race of people so there are more room for their people to live. I disagree with them, I think they are wrong, but I accept that this is what they think. If I were to not in some way place my morals over theirs to highlight why I thought their actions were wrong, then all that would happen is;

People: We think it's ok to murder group A so we can live there

Me: Yes, you do think that.

If at some point we do not compare other views to our own or lay our morals over the top, then there are no arguments or discussion but there is no working out as close to the average moral standard as we can agree on either.
Reply
Pro-Life/Pro-Choice Discussion

Goto Page: 1 2 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum