Rev. John J. Smid
For the past 30 years, the modern American culture has bought into a lie! We have been sold a bill-of-goods about the nature of homosexuality that is spiritually and practically untrue.
"Spiritually untrue?" Odd, I was under the impression that balance of masculine and feminine energies was something people were taught to strive for in life
millennia before even the Old Testament was brought about, both east and west. And isn't thinking the way a so-called "normal" person of the opposite gender thought an ideal method of achieving this? Not to religiously offend, but if it's their "traditional values" and ideals against concepts brought about by the wisest minds of ancient Greek, Chinese, Celtic, and Indian cultures, who do you think has more credibility under their belt? Ah, but I digress...
On a related note, did anybody see The View today? (I feel
so not straight saying that
whee ) Maybe it was just a local rerun, but they had a 24 year-old who happily claimed he was straight ever since he was brought to a similar biblically-based establishment (I'm a bit hazy on the name, but it wasn't the same as this and even
they have over 25 nationwide locations.
gonk ), and he had the founder (a bishop) along with him. They claimed that they had no "anti-gay" underlying themes, but the program was all about warning them how difficult a gay life would be, and that being straight would save them from so much trouble and unhappiness, even going so far as to claim in their teaching that homosexuality, by record, never provides the love and care of a normal relationship, only sex.
It really bothered me that they claimed that, but I couldn't help but snicker when the guy claimed he was only going to have sex with a woman when he was married, and then there was this exchange of words:
"So, how long has it been since you were with a man?"
"4 years."
"So, you find girls attractive?"
"...I'm getting there..."
Me:
rofl Oh, and I just read Corinthians 6, as the reverend referred to using to teach people that homosexuality was bad and all that. I believe it mentioned the word "homosexuality" once, then went on to drunkenness, adultery, and all the other things the New Testament that won't get you into their idea of heaven. For a holy man of his faith, I'd have thought he could back himself up better than that.
xp