|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:23 pm
Red Kutai J 4 C K Red Kutai J 4 C K Red Kutai J 4 C K Attacking with 16 users at a time might be unfair, especially if your opponent only has... let's say 5.
Thats why you come up with Posts and Browses that work for removal. Besides, since it's Attack User styled, one user with high Spam and Lit could hold off a whole army... 3nodding
Right?
That's the only way I can figure it working out fairly; otherwise, you just attack their big guys with your little ones and your big ones run through... 3nodding
This is getting done a lot faster than I thought it would.
It most certainly is; I expected it to take some time. By the by, you mentioned User types earlier (Admin, n00b, etc.), and I was wondering if there were any others you could think of... :/
"Red Kutai" would be a specific user card. It needs it's own type of label. "Lanzer" would have this label, as well as Admin and any others that fit.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:31 pm
J 4 C K Red Kutai J 4 C K Red Kutai J 4 C K Okay, so if you choose the attackers and the blockers, then you can't choose all attackers at the same time. You attack one user, then it resolves, and you then choose another user to attack with, resolve, etc.
Right?
That's the only way I can figure it working out fairly; otherwise, you just attack their big guys with your little ones and your big ones run through... 3nodding
This is getting done a lot faster than I thought it would.
It most certainly is; I expected it to take some time. By the by, you mentioned User types earlier (Admin, n00b, etc.), and I was wondering if there were any others you could think of... :/
"Red Kutai" would be a specific user card. It needs it's own type of label. "Lanzer" would have this label, as well as Admin and any others that fit.
Yes, like Magic's Legendary card type. I don't know what use for it, though, besides maybe "Special"...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:34 pm
Red Kutai J 4 C K Red Kutai J 4 C K Red Kutai J 4 C K Okay, so if you choose the attackers and the blockers, then you can't choose all attackers at the same time. You attack one user, then it resolves, and you then choose another user to attack with, resolve, etc.
Right?
That's the only way I can figure it working out fairly; otherwise, you just attack their big guys with your little ones and your big ones run through... 3nodding
This is getting done a lot faster than I thought it would.
It most certainly is; I expected it to take some time. By the by, you mentioned User types earlier (Admin, n00b, etc.), and I was wondering if there were any others you could think of... :/
"Red Kutai" would be a specific user card. It needs it's own type of label. "Lanzer" would have this label, as well as Admin and any others that fit.
Yes, like Magic's Legendary card type. I don't know what use for it, though, besides maybe "Special"...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:36 pm
J 4 C K Red Kutai J 4 C K Red Kutai J 4 C K And if they have at least 1 user on the field, you have to attack it, if you want to try and do any damage to the actual player. Obviously.
This is getting done a lot faster than I thought it would.
It most certainly is; I expected it to take some time. By the by, you mentioned User types earlier (Admin, n00b, etc.), and I was wondering if there were any others you could think of... :/
"Red Kutai" would be a specific user card. It needs it's own type of label. "Lanzer" would have this label, as well as Admin and any others that fit.
Yes, like Magic's Legendary card type. I don't know what use for it, though, besides maybe "Special"...
Hmm, interesting connotation. I didn't really want to use "Special", since that's already an Item type. Best thing I found was "Unique", but I'm fairly certain I like "Spotlight" better... 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:38 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:38 pm
Red Kutai J 4 C K Red Kutai J 4 C K Red Kutai J 4 C K And if they have at least 1 user on the field, you have to attack it, if you want to try and do any damage to the actual player. Obviously.
This is getting done a lot faster than I thought it would.
It most certainly is; I expected it to take some time. By the by, you mentioned User types earlier (Admin, n00b, etc.), and I was wondering if there were any others you could think of... :/
"Red Kutai" would be a specific user card. It needs it's own type of label. "Lanzer" would have this label, as well as Admin and any others that fit.
Yes, like Magic's Legendary card type. I don't know what use for it, though, besides maybe "Special"...
Hmm, interesting connotation. I didn't really want to use "Special", since that's already an Item type. Best thing I found was "Unique", but I'm fairly certain I like "Spotlight" better... 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:39 pm
Clitical Hit! Possible new template?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:39 pm
Clitical Hit! Possible new template?
Looks good to me... 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:41 pm
J 4 C K Clitical Hit! Possible new template?
I'm sorry to say it, but it looks like we would need at least a couple different ones; some cards don't need the Stats Box, while others surely due... sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:44 pm
The only thing I don't like about this one is that for items, they'd be incredibly tiny in that box. I made sure it was large enough to fit a full avatar this time. ^^ Maybe we could use the empty base that TekTek has, with the item on it?
Also, I'm not sure what would be different for different types of cards. I guess on the ones that don't need the stat box it would just be removed, other than that it'd pretty much be the same, no?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:44 pm
Red Kutai J 4 C K Clitical Hit! Possible new template?
I'm sorry to say it, but it looks like we would need at least a couple different ones; some cards don't need the Stats Box, while others surely due... sweatdrop
Possible colors for the types.
Users: Blue
Browse: The gray color on the front page
Post: ?
Gaia: ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:46 pm
J 4 C K Red Kutai J 4 C K Clitical Hit! Possible new template?
I'm sorry to say it, but it looks like we would need at least a couple different ones; some cards don't need the Stats Box, while others surely due... sweatdrop
Possible colors for the types.
Users: Blue
Browse: The gray color on the front page
Post: ?
Gaia: ?
I could see Posts being Purple, like the "Post Reply" and "Quote" buttons. As for Gaia cards... =Ponders=
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:46 pm
Clitical Hit! The only thing I don't like about this one is that for items, they'd be incredibly tiny in that box. I made sure it was large enough to fit a full avatar this time. ^^ Maybe we could use the empty base that TekTek has, with the item on it?
Also, I'm not sure what would be different for different types of cards. I guess on the ones that don't need the stat box it would just be removed, other than that it'd pretty much be the same, no?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:48 pm
Red Kutai J 4 C K Red Kutai J 4 C K Clitical Hit! Possible new template?
I'm sorry to say it, but it looks like we would need at least a couple different ones; some cards don't need the Stats Box, while others surely due... sweatdrop
Possible colors for the types.
Users: Blue
Browse: The gray color on the front page
Post: ?
Gaia: ?
I could see Posts being Purple, like the "Post Reply" and "Quote" buttons. As for Gaia cards... =Ponders=
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:50 pm
J 4 C K Clitical Hit! The only thing I don't like about this one is that for items, they'd be incredibly tiny in that box. I made sure it was large enough to fit a full avatar this time. ^^ Maybe we could use the empty base that TekTek has, with the item on it?
Also, I'm not sure what would be different for different types of cards. I guess on the ones that don't need the stat box it would just be removed, other than that it'd pretty much be the same, no? Like this? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
