|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:10 am
Nihilistic_Impact Darsh, did you recently watch starship troopers? Not recently, no. I just like the little propganda ads they had.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:10 am
Ambient heat and light energy? Explain yourself.
They were funny. Too bad you couldn't ask for more.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:10 am
Point him to Gamma for a deathmatch.
Because that fight would be full of lols.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:12 am
Ryugi uses flame energy for attacks.
That energy creates a large ammount of heat that Ryugi can use for attacks and or defensive moves while charging the energy.
His light attacks can compress the photons together tightly enough to form a solid mass for use in defense and such.
It's a little cheesy, but then again, I'm the King of Cheese.
|
 |
 |
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:14 am
No, Ryugi, just no.
Photons don't like it when you compress them.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:16 am
Ryugi uses Positive Energy and Elemental Fire. Mix the two and you get Quasi-elemental Radiance.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:17 am
One, heat won't mean s**t. I direct you to Vahn's comment a few pages back.
Two, so basicly a barrier, and that is cheese. Some advice, slope it to any oncoming projectiles, and if you can give it a curve.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:19 am
Use whatever magic you want, but if someone tried to shield themselves with something that has no invariant mass...
I'd probably shoot them.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:21 am
It's a flashlight. mrgreen
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:30 am
Of course I'd slope it or round it. I wouldn't make it flat like that. A straight on hit could shatter a shield like that.
I'm going on the idea that photons are a light "particle", and therefore have mass. I realize it might not be entirely scientifically true, but at least it makes a little more sense than shadow elementals that can craft shapes with something that really doesn't have a particle to it. xd
Its cheesy, yes, but then again, it IS magic. And I'm TRYING to make it make at least some sense.
|
 |
 |
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:32 am
Hey, just because a lot of people are jumping off one side of a bridge doesn't mean you should jump off the other side to be different.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:33 am
I'd put in a vote for a powerful localized explosion via fire magic or whatever. Blow the pellets are away from you.
But photons are too small to form substance. No protons, no neutrons, no electrons. No mass. If they had mass, your face would be obliterated by the photons emitted by your computer screen.
Also; photons are in constant motion and you couldn't make them fit to any form. See 'Speed of Light'.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:33 am
Meh, I'd rather have some sort of a deffinaition deffinition for how I can do it instead of just saying, "It's magic." And thats what I came up with.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:34 am
I know. I'm just a picky b*****d that hates the bastardization of science for magic. If it's magic, say it's magic.
Don't cross the streams.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:36 am
Man... Imagine Star Wars in a realistic universe.
All the lightsaber battles would be over pretty quickly. rofl
EDIT: And almost all end in ties or alot of fancy dancing and twisting to avoid getting hit. xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|