|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:59 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:00 pm
Griff Morivan So. Does anyone know of any mediocre or outright bad FPS or Third Person Shooters? LEFT 4 DEAD (1&2)... Mainly 2.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:00 pm
Preferably PC, needs to be something a mite bit older.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:01 pm
superpsyco77 Ah yes, much more popular in the Eastern regions of Asia. Fascinating subject, that Buddhism. Also, Logic is just that. It could be defined as encompassing two forms of subject, the linear/traditional mathematical type reasoning and the ethical/common sense type of logic. What type of logic you would use is dependent entirely upon the situation, but all logic can be roughly fit into those broad categories. AS far as it begins or ends well, it's merely a process of thought. Do one come up with their ideas and notions with no factual evidence or reasoning as to why? Then that is madness. Does one go against what common sense would dictate one do? That is also madness. So...logic, for "normal" people would be what they believe to be true, because they can see no other way that it cannot be true. Then what happens if a "mad" person with...let's say...some form of disorder that falls, defined by medicine, under schizophrenia or any other schizoid form. And that person believes he or she is dead. And since dead people have no need for food, this person, too, believes food is not necessary for him or her any longer. Can we then say that man can be mad, but thought not? And what do you understand under common sense?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:01 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:02 pm
Griff Morivan Preferably PC, needs to be something a mite bit older. If you what something older then try the Half-Life series is good form what I hear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:04 pm
Griff Morivan So. Does anyone know of any mediocre or outright bad FPS or Third Person Shooters? Uh... Daikatana?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:07 pm
******** that. Play Oni. Game was awesome... and by that I mean it was a terrible game but I wish someone had picked up that TPS system and done something better with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:07 pm
Lolololol, L4D bashing?
ED. THERE IS NEED OF YOUR BANHAMMER NOW.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:08 pm
You could probably google it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:09 pm
JimSohisohi If you what something older then try the Half-Life series is good form what I hear. He just asked from a bad game and you just recommended something that is suppose to be good? What the hell people?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:09 pm
Common sense and ethics are simply mathematical logic given a slightly new form and used more commonly on a day to day basis. Common sense is the practical application of logic, though not in the sense that one runs their day off what conclusion whatever proof they had written gives them, but in that there should be an obvious flow to the reasoning one has to do what one does. I.E.
1. I am hungry, ergo
2. I find food
3. The food is raw and thus unfit for eating, thus I
4. Cook it
Ethics is a bit different than this, thought that is a wholly different discussion for another time and it has no place in this conversation.
As far as you example goes, the logic would be true if there wasn't the underlying factor of mental illness. While it is true that the dead require no food, this man is not dead. He may perceive himself to be dead, but he is not. As much as he may think he is dead his belief in such is not enough to impose upon him the physical condition of death. Understandably if left alone he may simply not eat and eventually starve, but he was not dead when he first began to assume he was dead(at the onset of his illness.) In short, he may have had solid logic but the information he used was clearly false to lead to his justification, thus his argument was valid but his information was false thus making his argument unsound.
Edit: And I shall be right back. Packing up my things and heading to a friends house. I shall respond to any questions you may have Lu when I return. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:09 pm
Oni was ******** amazing. I remember picking it up second hand in middle school and being blown the ******** away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
