|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:06 am
Playing FF5. My party is composed of a Knight, a White Mage, a Monk, and a Thief with Lv 2 Black Magic. Win.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:11 am
Huh.
I'm actually liking Epic Score and Two Steps From Hell, what I've heard of them today anyway. Possibly due to my lack of epic-style background music.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:23 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:49 am
I want that car!
Also, work for me, too.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 1:21 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 2:29 pm
Seems reasonable. Fuerte has an infinite that's just canceling his forward dash move into his heavy punch over and over.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 4:40 pm
*chainthrows Silver around the arena*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 5:37 pm
Vintrict Playing FF5. My party is composed of a Knight, a White Mage, a Monk, and a Thief with Lv 2 Black Magic. Win. Don't you mean Dragoon, Dragoon, Dragoon, and Dragoon? A team of nothing but Black Mages subbing Time magic is hilarious.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 5:42 pm
Ammiel Moonblade Vintrict Playing FF5. My party is composed of a Knight, a White Mage, a Monk, and a Thief with Lv 2 Black Magic. Win. Don't you mean Dragoon, Dragoon, Dragoon, and Dragoon? A team of nothing but Black Mages subbing Time magic is hilarious. Is that effective? The Black Mage team?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 5:46 pm
For the most part, yeah. Haste, slows, and Firagas thrown left and right. Mix in some nuke/flare for good measure. Most things can't stand up to a mage assault and have little to no resistance against it.
Unless you run up against someone with reflect or something. Then you want some white mage for some Delta Attack / counter reflect, since you can't reflect reflected magic or anything. Still, you mostly do it as a joke.
It's not as overpowered as a bunch of chemists, Samurais (Gil Toss) or Hunter/Mystic Knights.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:54 pm
Sooooo~
Waiting three months+ for art?
Yay or Nay?
I've just dropped the bomb on two artists who have been MIA for the past three months with very little word on what's up other than "Busy sorry".
talk2hand one of them had barely even started, the other one was nearly done! He had SO little left to do, he would Livestream and I saw with my own eyes what was left. He could bust that s**t out in 20 minutes, considering the stuff he puts out in hours time.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 7:39 pm
Eh, I wouldn't be too pleased either >__>
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 7:54 pm
Both of those seem kind of completely unacceptable. The first one you'd expect them to have something to show for it, a sketch, lines, whatever it is they're supposed to do, and the other seems almost completed, so there's no reason they can't just focus on getting it done and earning their keep.
I mean, I know as well as the rest of you that lack of interest, art block, what have you can be a serious bummer, and patience is a virtue, but that just seems rude.
*Ninja vanishes for a while.*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 8:04 pm
Eh, I've waited upwards of two years before.
I'm pretty patient with art, partially because I tend to forget when I commission people.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:35 pm
I still owe HawkGrrl art from like 6 or so years ago
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|