|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 6:59 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:02 pm
Even if it only hit at a 45 degree angle upward, half of that force would directly oppose gravity. So it would take twice as many pounds of force as the weight of the object, but it would still work, without needing to come from directly beneath.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:03 pm
It'd be like picking up a quarter with no fingernails. You'd be chasing that rock all over town before you could get it off the ground.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:06 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:08 pm
Again, depends on how precise the control is.
But all of this really comes down to "Hey, makeshift telekinesis". In which case, TK would be far more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:11 pm
Basically. Still, I wouldn't want to be around said rock if someone tries to fight gravity using wind. Dirt and s**t flying off the rock would be like getting sandblasted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:17 pm
Would you say if a shape-shifter is changing forms they leave themselves fairly open to an attack?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:22 pm
Wouldn't that be up to the person whose power it is? There's many different interpretations of shapeshifting, from a painful realigning of muscle, flesh, and bone to a near-instantaneous switch to another form.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:25 pm
Brendyn Rogel Wouldn't that be up to the person whose power it is? There's many different interpretations of shapeshifting, from a painful realigning of muscle, flesh, and bone to a near-instantaneous switch to another form. Ugh, i've been out of practise for fighting for so long, I don't even know what's good form in terms of hitting your opponent. When can you say for certain in a post you strike an opponent? EDIT: Also, if it's not clarified, I can assume whatever, correct? For example, if he says he tackles me, but doesn't say how he's tackling me, I can assume he's trying to shoulder me rather than hit with the arms, or is it good etiquette to assume he means arms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:36 pm
just hit them when you want. their fault for taking the time to shift in the middle of a fiery fight against an alert opponent; this ain't sailor moon or power rangers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:39 pm
Slifer Ozura EDIT: Also, if it's not clarified, I can assume whatever, correct? For example, if he says he tackles me, but doesn't say how he's tackling me, I can assume he's trying to shoulder me rather than hit with the arms, or is it good etiquette to assume he means arms.
1. use context clues.
2. use common sense.
3. defer to the usual, the norm.
4. interpret as you wish, knowing that you can expect he same treatment if you ever slip.
i think that's the way it usually goes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:41 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:44 pm
I can take a move if I think it's going to kill him correct? And he can just say there was extensive damage and he doesn't die? I mean, I should be allowed to make a move even if it's going to potentially kill him, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:48 pm
take a... what are you talking about ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:48 pm
I didn't think I was in a fight in the stadium.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
