|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:28 pm
Despite being a 100 meter long craft, hitting a ship moving at 3 kilometers a second tends to be a bit out of a turbolaser's traversal. The Falcon is only capable of around 500 m/sec in the movies. Plus the ship does have shields optimized to deflect laser fire...
I do know my EVE Online ships. This is just a frigate, be glad I didn't bring a Dreadnaught. Now that would be a one-up manship contest.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:28 pm
And didn't we come to an agreement that blasters are in fact, not lasers, but significantly stronger?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:30 pm
True, but my ship has resistances against electromagnetic and thermal energy, the primary damage component of a turbolaser.
If you had hit me with a mass-driver I might be a burning pile of wreckage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:33 pm
Funny, because where I'm standing, you ARE a burning pile of wreckage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:38 pm
Must have hit a drone... they've got crappy hitpoints anyway.
Lets see... Where did I put those stats. Ah... here they are.
Warrior
Large drone
Init +5; Senses +5 Perception
Defense Ref 14 (flat-footed 12), Fort 19; +3 armor
hp 60; DR 5; SR 15; Threshold 24
Speed fly 18 squares (max velocity 1,050 km/h), fly 8 squares (starship scale)
Ranged gatling autocannons +3 (see below)
Fighting Space 2x2 or 1 square (starship scale); Cover none
Base Atk +0; Grp +14
Atk Options autofire (gatling autocannons)
Abilities Str 28, Dex 12, Con -, Int 15
Skills Initiative +5, Mechanics +5, Perception +5, Pilot +5, Use Computer +5
Crew 0 (normal); Passengers none
Cargo none; Consumables 2 days; Carried Craft none
Availability Licensed; Cost 4,000
I'm working on a conversion of the Star Wars Rules for the EVE Online universe btw... That could be a fun change of pace, blasters are much nastier in that universe then in Star Wars. They fire metal super-heated into a plasma state. Talk about burning agony.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:43 pm
So I was hired on the spot. ******** yeah!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:48 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:52 pm
You know what, I'm just gonna let the modders fight it out amongst themselves.
Des, Stellar called you a limpwristed f*****t.
Stellar, Des called you a mouthbreathing retard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:55 pm
Nelowulf And didn't we come to an agreement that blasters are in fact, not lasers, but significantly stronger? I'd like to hear about that. The Trek supremacist types try to use that as an advantage when referring to phasers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:01 pm
Rodyn Nelowulf And didn't we come to an agreement that blasters are in fact, not lasers, but significantly stronger? I'd like to hear about that. The Trek supremacist types try to use that as an advantage when referring to phasers. Bah to the trekkies who fight about such rubbish.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:08 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:20 pm
Fine, don't congratulate me that I'm no-longer unemployed. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:24 pm
I'm not sure if that's cause for celebration. Could mean another period of hiatus, in a way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:31 pm
Cale Darksun Rodyn Nelowulf And didn't we come to an agreement that blasters are in fact, not lasers, but significantly stronger? I'd like to hear about that. The Trek supremacist types try to use that as an advantage when referring to phasers. Bah to the trekkies who fight about such rubbish. Aye.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
