|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hygenic Conversationalist
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 12:08 am
XcoldhandsX I'll go skim their rules and guidelines. Already did when they posted the announcement about changes to the TOS. You actually can't advertise for other sites, at least not too openly....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 10:33 pm
Millenium Joker XcoldhandsX AWESOME! My skeleton thingy is now a slightly bigger red demon thingy! What? I used to have what you've got in your sig. My daemon physically evolved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 10:35 pm
Imperator Gnome XcoldhandsX I'll go skim their rules and guidelines. Already did when they posted the announcement about changes to the TOS. You actually can't advertise for other sites, at least not too openly.... You think we can still get away with it? I'm not sure how to be sly about these kinds of things. Ontop of that my specifics on lore such as the in-game books and the details of race history are a little edgy once you get past the Nord. Imperator, you think you can handle recruitment on the other site while I make a recruitment thread here on gaia? I think we need to be recruiting from wherever we can get recruits from.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 2:49 pm
XcoldhandsX Imperator Gnome XcoldhandsX I'll go skim their rules and guidelines. Already did when they posted the announcement about changes to the TOS. You actually can't advertise for other sites, at least not too openly.... You think we can still get away with it? I'm not sure how to be sly about these kinds of things. Ontop of that my specifics on lore such as the in-game books and the details of race history are a little edgy once you get past the Nord. Imperator, you think you can handle recruitment on the other site while I make a recruitment thread here on gaia? I think we need to be recruiting from wherever we can get recruits from. I'll talk to some of my old friends on the OSWG and see if I can get them to swing in. They were more short story writers than RPers, but they might want to join. As for the Oblivion Wiki, I'm not really sure how to advertise there... I don't really frequent that site or have an account there, but I'll try, and if someone else does I'll definitely help. And on a slightly different note This has to be shared. It makes me feel things
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hygenic Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 9:17 pm
Effective, but no match for a sword and shield.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:13 am
Joker, how soon can you post in the Gold Road RP?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hygenic Conversationalist
|
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 4:10 pm
XcoldhandsX Effective, but no match for a sword and shield. True, but Sword and Board is almost impossible to beat one on one unless assuming equal skills on the combatants parts. Then again... A sword like that can break shields... So...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 11:32 am
Imperator Gnome XcoldhandsX Effective, but no match for a sword and shield. True, but Sword and Board is almost impossible to beat one on one unless assuming equal skills on the combatants parts. Then again... A sword like that can break shields... So... No, it wouldn't break the shield. At best it would lodge into and deeply scar it. Even if it did break it the wild momentum of the swing would be impossible to just stop and would give the opposing warrior time to hack the other guy into little tiny pieces.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 11:36 am
I noticed a few typos/grammar errors on the front page so I'ma go fix those.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 1:37 pm
XcoldhandsX Imperator Gnome XcoldhandsX Effective, but no match for a sword and shield. True, but Sword and Board is almost impossible to beat one on one unless assuming equal skills on the combatants parts. Then again... A sword like that can break shields... So... No, it wouldn't break the shield. At best it would lodge into and deeply scar it. Even if it did break it the wild momentum of the swing would be impossible to just stop and would give the opposing warrior time to hack the other guy into little tiny pieces. Unless the Great Sword guy really knew what he was doing >.> But regardless.... Unless we're talking about a game unless theres a huge mismatch in their respective skills and abilities than the sword and board will win just about every time. Thats why the Great Sword needs to be supported by others like him, or perhaps a shield man. Though now that I think about it there is historical precedence for BA greatsword wielding warriors cultures/heros taking on sword and board.... Hmm....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hygenic Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 1:49 pm
Imperator Gnome XcoldhandsX Imperator Gnome XcoldhandsX Effective, but no match for a sword and shield. True, but Sword and Board is almost impossible to beat one on one unless assuming equal skills on the combatants parts. Then again... A sword like that can break shields... So... No, it wouldn't break the shield. At best it would lodge into and deeply scar it. Even if it did break it the wild momentum of the swing would be impossible to just stop and would give the opposing warrior time to hack the other guy into little tiny pieces. Unless the Great Sword guy really knew what he was doing >.> But regardless.... Unless we're talking about a game unless theres a huge mismatch in their respective skills and abilities than the sword and board will win just about every time. Thats why the Great Sword needs to be supported by others like him, or perhaps a shield man. Though now that I think about it there is historical precedence for BA greatsword wielding warriors cultures/heros taking on sword and board.... Hmm.... No. Sword and shield win against single sword always unless there is a serious mis-match in the quality of equipment and skill of the fighters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 3:23 pm
XcoldhandsX Imperator Gnome XcoldhandsX Imperator Gnome XcoldhandsX Effective, but no match for a sword and shield. True, but Sword and Board is almost impossible to beat one on one unless assuming equal skills on the combatants parts. Then again... A sword like that can break shields... So... No, it wouldn't break the shield. At best it would lodge into and deeply scar it. Even if it did break it the wild momentum of the swing would be impossible to just stop and would give the opposing warrior time to hack the other guy into little tiny pieces. Unless the Great Sword guy really knew what he was doing >.> But regardless.... Unless we're talking about a game unless theres a huge mismatch in their respective skills and abilities than the sword and board will win just about every time. Thats why the Great Sword needs to be supported by others like him, or perhaps a shield man. Though now that I think about it there is historical precedence for BA greatsword wielding warriors cultures/heros taking on sword and board.... Hmm.... No. Sword and shield win against single sword always unless there is a serious mis-match in the quality of equipment and skill of the fighters. You forget though. We are not talking about a simple single sword. We're talking about a Mofoing GREAT SWORD! He has the reach advantage. He has alot more momentum in his swing. If a person isn't properly set he can knock people down, and he can hit hard enough to break shields (In several hits) or quite possible the arm beneath the shield. And we've already made the mismatch of skill point several times. I'm just trying to say its not so completely useless as you might think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hygenic Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 7:54 pm
The ultimate weapon is the Great Axe, hands down.
Has the crushing power of a mace, the slashing of an axe, and the bone-breaking ability of a warhammer, along with the powerful swings and reach of a greatsword. If you want to break a shield, the Great Axe is the weapon to go with.
Although, I DO prefer Greatswords over anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 8:24 pm
Imperator Gnome XcoldhandsX Imperator Gnome XcoldhandsX Imperator Gnome True, but Sword and Board is almost impossible to beat one on one unless assuming equal skills on the combatants parts. Then again... A sword like that can break shields... So... No, it wouldn't break the shield. At best it would lodge into and deeply scar it. Even if it did break it the wild momentum of the swing would be impossible to just stop and would give the opposing warrior time to hack the other guy into little tiny pieces. Unless the Great Sword guy really knew what he was doing >.> But regardless.... Unless we're talking about a game unless theres a huge mismatch in their respective skills and abilities than the sword and board will win just about every time. Thats why the Great Sword needs to be supported by others like him, or perhaps a shield man. Though now that I think about it there is historical precedence for BA greatsword wielding warriors cultures/heros taking on sword and board.... Hmm.... No. Sword and shield win against single sword always unless there is a serious mis-match in the quality of equipment and skill of the fighters. You forget though. We are not talking about a simple single sword. We're talking about a Mofoing GREAT SWORD! He has the reach advantage. He has alot more momentum in his swing. If a person isn't properly set he can knock people down, and he can hit hard enough to break shields (In several hits) or quite possible the arm beneath the shield. And we've already made the mismatch of skill point several times. I'm just trying to say its not so completely useless as you might think. Well the average great sword user against the average sword and shield user the greatsword user will almost always result in the former winning. Although if both were experts with their weapons the greatsword user would have a considerably better chance of winning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hygenic Conversationalist
|
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:33 pm
XcoldhandsX Imperator Gnome XcoldhandsX Imperator Gnome XcoldhandsX Imperator Gnome True, but Sword and Board is almost impossible to beat one on one unless assuming equal skills on the combatants parts. Then again... A sword like that can break shields... So... No, it wouldn't break the shield. At best it would lodge into and deeply scar it. Even if it did break it the wild momentum of the swing would be impossible to just stop and would give the opposing warrior time to hack the other guy into little tiny pieces. Unless the Great Sword guy really knew what he was doing >.> But regardless.... Unless we're talking about a game unless theres a huge mismatch in their respective skills and abilities than the sword and board will win just about every time. Thats why the Great Sword needs to be supported by others like him, or perhaps a shield man. Though now that I think about it there is historical precedence for BA greatsword wielding warriors cultures/heros taking on sword and board.... Hmm.... No. Sword and shield win against single sword always unless there is a serious mis-match in the quality of equipment and skill of the fighters. You forget though. We are not talking about a simple single sword. We're talking about a Mofoing GREAT SWORD! He has the reach advantage. He has alot more momentum in his swing. If a person isn't properly set he can knock people down, and he can hit hard enough to break shields (In several hits) or quite possible the arm beneath the shield. And we've already made the mismatch of skill point several times. I'm just trying to say its not so completely useless as you might think. Well the average great sword user against the average sword and shield user the greatsword user will almost always result in the former winning. Although if both were experts with their weapons the greatsword user would have a considerably better chance of winning. Problem with that is that the Greatsword user would then know that the Sword and Board would take advantage of any swing he committed enough strength to....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
