|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 11:44 am
What happened to the 'Quick, hide behind a garbage can' strategy?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 11:55 am
Jess - That's gorgeous!! ((Missing Ra'kar's facial markings)) BUT G-O-R-G-E-O-U-S-! 4laugh heart
Thank you so much luvey! Hope you liked the movie <3
Bren - stare ... *thwaps* .... ninja
Ryugi - Mew. Anyone's safe in here unless they're trying to destroy the place or another member without cause. And no soul erasage for chu. Isn't it against the terms? ^_^;;; Or do different rules apply to fights with the judges?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:10 pm
*is thwapped* gonk
Same rules apply, just judges have less to lose if they're DQ'd, so they can be brutal.
And that's a good question B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:42 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:45 pm
Is a spectator allowed to interfere if they know that someone's in danger of being erased? And If not... what would the reprocussions be?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:49 pm
It'd be like the Blazestar issue with Glacier, DQ for the person the interference was for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:54 pm
What if the person interfeared on the side of the judge to get around that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:25 pm
The judge would be DQ'd. =P
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 3:11 pm
I WANT TO LIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVE!!!!! gonk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 6:23 pm
...Ya, that was quite the nasty story.
What a horrible thing to do gonk ...attempting to erase characters...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 7:40 pm
*Gives up on waiting and passes out*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:49 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
