|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 4:45 pm
Well, for good mutli-tasking?
And it's an ergonomic keyboard...? And it's totally less cramped. >_< I hit the right keys on the larger keyboard.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 6:24 pm
Yeah, having two monitors is definitely useful; for example, keeping your email on one, and whatever you're working on at the moment on the other (which is exactly how I use the dual monitors on my PC at work)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 7:50 pm
Yes, that's exactly the type of thing it is. Or if you're working on something that's a work in progress, then you can work on it with one monitor, and see the whole picture on the second. Very handy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 8:28 pm
hey, I should try that!
but I don't remember where our old monitors went gonk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 1:17 am
How's that work? You only have one mouse, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 8:03 am
Yes, but you configure your system so that if you go past the right edge of the left screen, your pointer moves to the left edge of the right screen.
Think of the Nintendo DS: it's practically the same exact concept, except the DS has the dual screen as up/down instead of left/right
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 8:18 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 12:31 pm
XDD That, my friends, is the heart of the matter. Useful, sure. But nothing beats the awesomeness... of just having the capability.
XD It's the simple things in life, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 1:53 pm
It'd be nicer if there was a way to make several of me so I can finish my debts...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 5:09 pm
there is, do work and say you did it all on Monday
that way, everyone's like 'OMFG there must be 5 of him to get it done in one day!!!'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 6:20 pm
Personally, I don't think the world can handle that much Bapp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 6:25 pm
perhaps it's like with Chuck Norris?
Chuck Norris cannot clone himself, for if there were two Chucks in existence, the Universe would shut down from the epicness
except with Bapp, it would shut down from excessive laziness
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 9:55 pm
excessive something... not sure what...
maybe just excessive Bapp-ness?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 1:50 am
Bapp-ness is equilvalent to awesomeness biggrin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 7:44 am
not quite, 1 Bapp point=2/3 awesome point + 1/3 lazy point
but since Chuck already has infinite awesomeness, Bapp's awesomeness is negated when talking about clones
leaving only the lazy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
