|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 5:26 pm
Thunder Bolts and Lightnin'
So very very frightning!
Galileo Galileo
Galileo Galileo
Figadooooooooo
I'm just a poor boy...
Er uh...I dont like V-wings in combat.Fun to fly around and stuff but just sort of a bad combat vehicle.Now an ARC-170,one of those I could see myself in.Or mabey a,crap ya know.One of those bombers,like the one Grevious flys...what's it called...damn.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 5:27 pm
oh, you're referencing Battlefront arent you? 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 5:29 pm
Queen rox my sox.
But I'm not sure on the grevious ship. and the ARC-170 is just a bit.. geh in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 5:33 pm
the same job can be done with a smaller, faster vehicle.
then there's the K-wing, which is just sexy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 5:38 pm
Nospai Deathous the same job can be done with a smaller, faster vehicle. Hence why the ARC-170 evolved into the Xwing (according to Lucas, who stated when episode III came out, the ARC was to be the X-wing's predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 5:40 pm
My friend thinks the ARC-170 was the predesessor to the E-Wing.And,K-wing?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 5:52 pm
Only visually. the K-wing was designed by a whole different company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:22 pm
and in terms of operational capacity and comparable speed (space-going)... tho the K makes a much, much better bomber.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:24 pm
Finally I have a use for that Card. Been wondering when I would use that. xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:28 pm
Nospai Deathous and in terms of operational capacity and comparable speed (space-going)... tho the K makes a much, much better bomber. agreed. the K-wing is a beast.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:40 pm
I prefer speed,quick firing and powerful main weapons,and gravity effected bombs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:42 pm
I prefer a fast ship, with powerful weapons, and more shields than a mon cal cruiser preferably. But people in hell want icewater as well...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:45 pm
lol. i like a ship with speed and adequate weapons...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:46 pm
A-wings are good, but they kind of suck when it comes to taking down multiple Star Destroyers on Ace Mode.
Alas! If only an A-wing could have the shields of an Xwing even, they'd rule the skies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:47 pm
Speed, guns, and armor. priorities in that order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
