|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 2:42 am
YummyBiscuits King Bug Yeah. It's all good. WoW porn is superior. Fact. Not that I'd know anything about any of that, because I have never seen nor ever intend to see any pornographic materials of any kind. Beastiality is the king of all porn. Bestiality. That's why they call it the best.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 2:45 am
C. Fox YummyBiscuits But there's like no porn for KoF. Trust me, I've tried to find some. dude... what? Im guessing you dont like at cartoon/hentai-manga porn... Because if you do, then you clearly arent actually looking. Because with Characters like Yuri, Leona, King and SPECIALLY Mai, theres bound to be a million Kof porn... AND there IS The sites I frequent don't have it. And the stuff I find is like, low quality, line art-y, fuzzy images. I haven't done straight up google searches for the s**t, but man, if I see street fighter, resident evil, inuyasha, and mortal kombat porn side by side, I'm left wondering where the ******** king of fighters is before I start jerking it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 2:46 am
King Bug YummyBiscuits King Bug Yeah. It's all good. WoW porn is superior. Fact. Not that I'd know anything about any of that, because I have never seen nor ever intend to see any pornographic materials of any kind. Beastiality is the king of all porn. Bestiality. That's why they call it the best. Have you seen that video of the chick who lost the bet? Had to ******** her dog, and post it on Facebook. It doesn't show much, but it is downright NASTY
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 2:48 am
The tragedy is KoF is so uninteresting I probably wouldn't even recognize its sluts if I saw them.
Then again Fox is like mexiblack and likes ******** up s**t like chunky women. Thinks chun li's pillar thighs are wet dream worthy.
He also beat off to panda porn one time. RIGHT FOX?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 2:49 am
YummyBiscuits Have you seen that video of the chick who lost the bet? Had to ******** her dog, and post it on Facebook. It doesn't show much, but it is downright NASTY lolwtf
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 2:49 am
Protest the Hero just became the number one band in my book, again. Best ******** fight music ever.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 2:52 am
The Thunder Tyrant The Overlord Clause (stolen from HoH) basically lets a judge nerf, change, or otherwise make a decision on an ability at any given moment. Or to make any decision they see fit for the sake of the tournament, really. So if an ability says "chains as strong as steel" a judge can step in and go "You know what? I think that's a bit much. They're weaker from no on for the sake of balance." In this case, the judges decided that the quality of the chains being breakable was more pertinent than their likeness to steel. Like I said before though, if it was an issue.. the judges should have seen to it in profile grading. But this sort of hindsight judging on abilities does happen, rarely. Normally it comes up when the wording of something is vague and a person makes it definite in a way that the judges had not desired or interpreted. Such has "I make a fireball" being "I make a sphere of all consuming holocaust flames capable of incinerating flesh from bone." Is it fun to deal with? Not particularly. Much you can do about it? Not really, it's an instance of making a judgment call on an ability's potency, not on the logic of it. So saying "But they're strong as steel!" isn't relevant anymore, because the judges have decided that no, they aren't, by interpreting the breakable aspect to be more important than the steel part in the sense that they've decided how breakable they are, rather than utilizing the likeness-of-steel description. Such is life in the GTB. At first I approved of this as a necessity. Then I thought 'what if a judge did this to me mid-fight. Man that could really ruin what I'm currently doing'. So basically at any point in my fight if the judge decides something is too powerful they can choose to immediately ruin your current attack and strategy just because the other person calls you in? That could lose you the fight just because they do a shitty job of moderating at the start. How the ******** is it fair in a competitive environment to suddenly lose something you were otherwise guaranteed, sometimes during an attack or a defence?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 2:54 am
That's why ( when applicable ) you generally Grandfather Clause the first instance and then have it adjusted for every instance afterwards.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 2:56 am
Patcharoo At first I approved of this as a necessity. Then I thought 'what if a judge did this to me mid-fight. Man that could really ruin what I'm currently doing'. So basically at any point in my fight if the judge decides something is too powerful they can choose to immediately ruin your current attack and strategy just because the other person calls you in? That could lose you the fight just because they do a shitty job of moderating at the start. How the ******** is it fair in a competitive environment to suddenly lose something you were otherwise guaranteed, sometimes during an attack or a defence? That's why use has to be judicious, and usually the judge can at least be conciliatory or apologetic because it IS a mistake on their end. Most often, it should come up when something is vague, or when the player interpreted x as y in their profile, but the judges interpreted x as z. Like the fireball example I used - the judges just thought "Okay, fireball that goes boom, causes some burns." Player thought "Fireball that incinerates flesh, ashes bone, and melts metal." At that point, the judges would be like "Wait.. that's not what we thought you meant. You gotta change that." That's an understandable situation on differing interpretations and the judges have to go with what they feel is correct. Ideally, everybody would have the same interpretations and the judges would never make mistakes or overlook anything.. but things are rarely ideal. Judges make mistakes, so sometimes they have to step in and tweak things. Like I said, it shouldn't happen often.. but it DOES have a relevant use, because hindsight is 20/20.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 2:57 am
Patcharoo At first I approved of this as a necessity. Then I thought 'what if a judge did this to me mid-fight. Man that could really ruin what I'm currently doing'. So basically at any point in my fight if the judge decides something is too powerful they can choose to immediately ruin your current attack and strategy just because the other person calls you in? That could lose you the fight just because they do a shitty job of moderating at the start. How the ******** is it fair in a competitive environment to suddenly lose something you were otherwise guaranteed, sometimes during an attack or a defence? The basis is that the move was previously approved, but when it's seen in action, it exceeds the power level relevant to the fight. Like Sigil's chains bro. How would you like to be caught up in pretty much an auto-disease, near auto-grapple, auto hit? It's not fair to the other person. Rp fighting is about being fair to the other person, while asserting yourself as dominant. If you can't find another way to show off the character, there ain't no business getting into a tournament, bro.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 2:58 am
Alright.
Maybe I'm just defensive because I half expect the hammer to come down on me and metalmorph.
Now to quietly hope they don't see this and then take it as a suggestion.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 2:59 am
Forgot to add.
And if you need an OP move to win a fight, get the ******** out of tournaments, and go make some real money.
Because real money is important.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 3:01 am
YummyBiscuits Patcharoo That could lose you the fight just because they do a shitty job of moderating at the start. The basis is that the move was previously approved, but when it's seen in action, it exceeds the power level relevant to the fight. Like Sigil's chains bro. How would you like to be caught up in pretty much an auto-disease, near auto-grapple, auto hit? It's not fair to the other person. Rp fighting is about being fair to the other person, while asserting yourself as dominant. If you can't find another way to show off the character, there ain't no business getting into a tournament, bro. *gestures to that part of his post* If someone decides mid-fight your character can't do what you thought you could do and you've invested in the attack your opponent gets a free shot at wrecking you.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 3:38 am
Imagine if we lived in a wacky world where you had some idea of what the acceptable scale of power was for the tournament before entering, so you could minimize the possibility of being in that situation. And if profiles were graded by multiple people to make it more likely that issues would be caught in grading, rather than in the middle of a fight?
Crazy s**t right there.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 3:42 am
The Thunder Tyrant Imagine if we lived in a wacky world where you had some idea of what the acceptable scale of power was for the tournament before entering, so you could minimize the possibility of being in that situation. And if profiles were graded by multiple people to make it more likely that issues would be caught in grading, rather than in the middle of a fight? Crazy s**t right there. Man now you are just asking way too much.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|