|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 10:17 pm
Voustant Hey Nana you might not remember me. But its me EarthWaker & Ncarur. O_o;;; Dear lord, your grammar's improved!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 10:53 pm
I think for the most part, on a whole BC's grammer has improved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 10:57 pm
Hytoshu Rahl I think for the most part, on a whole BC's grammer has improved. grammar* xp Grammar, it certainly seems so. Spelling..... well we're working on it. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 11:05 pm
I've always been a terrible speller. Rusvul and Tate used to correct me on it all the time. I've come a long ways though. They've done studies and and says that there are those that are literal readers and conceptual readers. Conceptual readers can't spell for a pot of beans and a garbage can on fire. I know I'm one of those. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 11:45 pm
Thanatos_M Hytoshu Rahl I think for the most part, on a whole BC's grammer has improved. grammar* xp Grammar, it certainly seems so. Spelling..... well we're working on it. sweatdrop hey practice makes purfect right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 11:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:00 am
Thanks TJ, been forever since I played any of the C&C games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:17 am
knux15 Thanatos_M Hytoshu Rahl I think for the most part, on a whole BC's grammer has improved. grammar* xp Grammar, it certainly seems so. Spelling..... well we're working on it. sweatdrop hey practice makes purfect right? Perfect* And no... there's always a limit within people of how far they can go, even with physical practice. KB: C&C?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:23 am
Command and Conquer. An old series of PC games and an N64 title, all pretty fun little micro management things. Sort of like the same premise as Starcraft, Empire Earth, or any other gane where you build units and bases to destroy the other team. The positioned defenses the Hand of Nod used was called the Obelisk of Light, was basically a tower that shot a refined laser beam at infantrya nd tabks that came within range. Extremely effective, but really high energy toll.
Good games if you like that sort of thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 10:15 am
Assume that the universe has been expanding since the planck time. Calculate the necessary value for omega (The density of the universe as expressed by a ratio of the gravitational forces and explusion forces) for all of creation to neither collapse nor expand into formless emptiness eons ago. Calculate omega for a universe that does not expand until after the planck time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 2:27 pm
Krono Zero Assume that the universe has been expanding since the planck time. Calculate the necessary value for omega (The density of the universe as expressed by a ratio of the gravitational forces and explusion forces) for all of creation to neither collapse nor expand into formless emptiness eons ago. Calculate omega for a universe that does not expand until after the planck time. Planck* Also, there is no singular point in time called the Planck time. Planck time is the measure of the amount of time it takes for a photon travelling at the speed of light to travel one Planck length. Nothing is known about the universe before the Big Bang at t=0, but modern science can help us understand the universe about one Planck time from t=0. For the universe to neither expand or collapse at a certain time, the ratio of the forces expanding it and those contracting it would have to be at equilibrium, or so I'd imagine: the ratio has to be 1:1, or put more simply. one. I believe by Planck time you may actually be referring to the Planck Epoch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 2:34 pm
By Planck time, I meant the period of time directly after the creation of the universe. From zero to 10-43 seconds. ^^; You might be right. One is of course the correct value though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 2:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:00 pm
Krono Zero By Planck time, I meant the period of time directly after the creation of the universe. From zero to 10-43 seconds. ^^; You might be right. One is of course the correct value though. 10^-43* Yes, that period is called the Planck Epoch. The Planck Epoch is the the period from t=0 to t=10^-43s; It was in this period that the universe had not yet separated, but the big bang had started. Planck time is the measure of time it takes for light to traverse one Planck length. The Planck Epoch and Planck Time do have the same length; meaning it was one Planck Time after the Big Bang that time and space began separating.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:02 pm
Ah.....thanks for clearing that up. ^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
![[ KB ]'s avatar](https://a1cdn.gaiaonline.com/dress-up/avatar/ava/8e/da/1743559e1bda8e_flip.png?t=1196322341_6.00_00)
