|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2004 9:30 am
I don't mean Elitism like that but...
A closed forum where people could only join through references of other Gaians. 3nodding
And the ability to be a reference has to be given by a mod or something.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2004 9:40 am
That'd be too much hassle and it would only cause a ton of people to suck up to everyone else, which might be good for egos, but it would get annoying as hell as well. The ability to post threads only after a certain amount of posts would also cause spam I guess, but if they didn't allow chatterbox posts to count it might work out.
To be honest I think the admins just need to make a ton of people mods, as *looks* two mods (even though it's Saturday) is a pathetic amount, especially considering that ~10k people are online. The existing mods also need to do a better job of telling people WHY their threads have been moved, as simply moving it and not saying anything isn't going to teach people that honestly do not know better a thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2004 10:05 am
There is proberly only Beramode out of the VGD mods I actually trust in doing the job. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2004 10:18 am
Most of the mods seem quite elitist to me with the exception of a few. Half of 'em just ignore me when I PM them lists of threads which are in the wrong place or lists of people with OVERLY (as I'm too lazy to report 501x500) large sigs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2004 10:35 am
Well, Beramode doesn't reply to my PM unless I've asked her a question, but I know she does things about the threads because she sometimes posts in them before getting rid of em'. sweatdrop
And I know Ryonin does stuff because he was the one who gave me my warning PM though that was nearly a year ago. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2004 10:42 am
Once I see the person has read the PM I check and see if the sigs/threads have been disabled/removed/moved/whatever. Most of the time they are still there, and yar.. I'm aware sigs show up in profiles even when signatures are disabled. ^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2004 11:05 am
All that sig stuff has confused my small mind. gonk
Kedian, do you own a FX5200? sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2004 11:07 am
No. =p
And sigs are disabled when they violate the rules, so people cannot see them when you make posts as if you had unchecked "attach signature", but they can still be seen in profiles. ^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2004 11:09 am
Ah. I getcha now. whee
Would a FX5200 run CoH nicely? sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2004 11:19 am
*has no idea what the FX5200's specs are*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2004 11:35 am
HIS Excalibur 9550SE 128MB Graphics
• Powered by ATI Radeon 9550 SE VPU - 250MHz
• 128MB-64bit DDR memory - 400MHz
• Four parallel pixel pipelines
• Two parallel vertex processing engines
• SMARTSHADER™ 2.0
• SMOOTHVISION™ 2.1
• TRUEFORM™ 2.0
• HYPER Z™ III+
• VIDEOSHADER™
• FULLSTREAM™
• AGP 8X (backward compatible with AGP 4X slots)
• DirectX 9 and OpenGL supported
• VGA, TV-Out and DVI-I supported
• Accessories included: S-Video Cable, Conversion Cable Mini-Din to • FULLSTREAM™
• AGP 8X (backward compatible with AGP 4X slots)
• DirectX 9 and OpenGL supported
• VGA, TV-Out and DVI-I supported
• Accessories included: S-Video Cable, Conversion Cable Mini-Din to RCA,
DVI to VGA Adaptor so you can enjoy dual VGA
Powered by NVidia GeForce FX 5200 GPU
• Available in 64/128 meg versions
• CineFX™ engine
• 128-bit studio-precision color
• Architected for Cg
• AGP 8X -2.1GB/s bandwidth to system
• Core Clock: 250MHz
• Memory Clock: 400MHz
• Memory Bandwidth: 6.4GB per second
• Fill Rate: 1.0 Billion texels per second
• Verticals per second: 63 million
• Operations per second: 1.03 trillion
• 0.15 Micron Process Technology
• NVIDIA®'s nView™ multi-display technology
• Digital Vibrance Control (DVC) 3.0
• 350MHz RAMDACs support 2048x1536 resolution at 75MHz
• 4 Pixels/Clock Rendering Pipeline
• Pixel Shader and Vertex Shader 2.0
• New 64-phase Video Scaler
• Highest DVI output up to 1600x1200
• Integrated TV encoder up to 1024x768 resolution
• Integrated full hardware MPEG-2 decoder
• NVidia® Unified Driver Architecture (UDA)
• Microsoft® DirectX® 9.0 Optimizations and Support
• OpenGL® 1.4 Optimizations and Support
It's one of these cards that I'm gonna buy... Just don't know which. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2004 11:46 am
*has no idea*
I'm sure the tech forum people could help! =p
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2004 11:48 am
Kedian *has no idea*I'm sure the tech forum people could help! =p Ya, I created a thread. sweatdrop It's the same decision there aswell... gonk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2004 11:53 am
Well if you cannot work out exactly which one is tecnically better it's probably best to go with the Geforce, seeing as that's a more popular make and thus most likely a more well made/supported card.
Are you considering getting CoH or something? @_a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2004 11:54 am
ATi Radeon SE cards suck a**.
ATi Radeon (Non-SE) are better than NVGeforces IMO. They can handle anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering so good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
