|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 2:08 pm
xp Yep yep
Fallout's addictive like that.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 8:29 pm
LIESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSsssss
why would you lie to me nar??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ishira Tsubasa Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 12:14 pm
because I wanna start somethingg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 11:21 pm
So should I go back to setting up a plot on my own then? or does anyone else wanna toss ideas into the basket?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 1:52 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 10:40 am
It was the whole pre-time skip story-arc or maybe restart from that point depending on who all has left now. Or maybe just another every faction gets wiped out and has to rebuild setup since it seems we keep hitting dead ends whenever one person tries to start a big overarching story. My own stand alone notes are just running off on wild tangents right now though.
If you mean what my characters were doing right now. That's just been me messing around trying to do something casual along the drop in drop out concept for anyone though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 4:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 6:54 pm
I didn't think starting over from the begining of the GNA would be a good idea since that kills off guilds, but backtracking to the idea of the simple drop in drop out RP's that don't exactly have the plots run too long seems like a good idea given our recent luck with people's lives getting in the way...
I'm impatient and know it... I mean once a day I can stay interested in, but after a week any ideas I've had floating around in my head are stale... longer that and I always hate having to look back at notes more detailed then my usual simplistic lot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:01 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:55 pm
Explain your idea again in different words/examples because I didn't understand.
"Drop in drop out" means something different to me than what I think you're trying to explain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:57 pm
Erm, yeah sorry guys.
I haven't really been active lately.
I've just worked a whole month fulltime and am now going on vacation for a week.
I'll probably not be on for that period.
I'd had an idea for a plot but I don't seem to find some nessesairy factors and now that I've done this work I kind of forgot about it... so yeah.
See u all in a week! blaugh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 5:29 pm
oop, you should try to remember what it was and tell us when you come back
hayve fun
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 3:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:42 pm
More or less it means that the RP is set up so that if say someone vanishes everyone else could retreat without large consequences. Or if two people are online while the others aren't then again they could keep going at a quick pace. Just the idea is to keep the RP running light enough on consequences to where everyone could keep going without us dealing with faction vs faction junk with one faction having an advantage due to having the active people while the other has more people that are slower to post.
For example how Nek and Ishi were able to post like mad during a night is what I want to allow. Without the whole faction lines crap other people could join in any running RP if they're online. With the faction lines crap we've been doing that situation meant their RP mutually exclusive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 4:04 pm
I can understand RPing something out that would further the RP and it being "mutually exclusive" temporarily.
Maybe at that time Neko could only get on for a short amount of time, and Ishi just so happened to be there too. So they RPed as much as they could before Neko had to leave for 300 years again.
Since that happened like once or twice, w/e.
I now understand what you were trying to say, and I agree. We should probably alter something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
