|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 9:38 pm
I haven't said a word about any of this, I think you just need to take a moment and just realize that you ain't gellin right now, might want to work on that.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 9:51 pm
The issue is.. you can't go with two judges. You have to have a third for when there's a split.
So some fights could be completed, but not all. Remember, judge majority > totaled scores. So you're stuck at an impasse if you have Sok and Vin disagreeing on the outcome of a fight without a third judge to weigh in on one way or the other.
I mean, you could run with two judges and only bring in the third on fights that require it and that would speed things up. But either way, you WILL need a third judge at some point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:24 pm
What? No.
The obvious answer is to have any ties settled by Coin Toss. It was super effective!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:28 pm
I went into this fully expecting up to a month before we got our grades, so I'm just sitting her calmly while half of ya'll are all upset lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:32 pm
If only we all lacked enough self-respect to accept the lowest possible standards! emo
Life's rough when you don't settle for the worst.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:39 pm
Sieg is like one of those game directors whose ideas terrify me, cause they'd either flop or turn out good.
Like "dude lets do -this-"
"That's... a really good idea!"
Then you add that s**t in the game, and turns out its broken as ******** and shouldve never been done in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:00 pm
C. Fox Sieg is like one of those game directors whose ideas terrify me, cause they'd either flop or turn out good. Like "dude lets do -this-" "That's... a really good idea!" Then you add that s**t in the game, and turns out its broken as ******** and shouldve never been done in the first place. lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 12:26 am
C. Fox Sieg is like one of those game directors whose ideas terrify me, cause they'd either flop or turn out good. Like "dude lets do -this-" "That's... a really good idea!" Then you add that s**t in the game, and turns out its broken as ******** and shouldve never been done in the first place. Man just putting stuff out there and seeing what sticks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:06 am
Actually, I'm generally an optimistic person. However, the little experience I've had with these tournaments has taught me that constantly agonizing over grades doesn't really accomplish anything. so I tell myself "ok, they'll get them in a month, alright, i can focus on other stuff while i'm waiting", then if "oh, they did them in two weeks?" happens, i'm pleasantly surprised.
Would I like grades faster? Sure I would. But honestly, I know when I'm constantly hounded for something, it makes me less motivated to do it. So I'll pass on pushing the judges to hurry up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 5:12 am
The Thunder Tyrant The issue is.. you can't go with two judges. You have to have a third for when there's a split. So some fights could be completed, but not all. Remember, judge majority > totaled scores. So you're stuck at an impasse if you have Sok and Vin disagreeing on the outcome of a fight without a third judge to weigh in on one way or the other. I mean, you could run with two judges and only bring in the third on fights that require it and that would speed things up. But either way, you WILL need a third judge at some point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Female of the Species
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 6:09 am
Would you rather we go
"This guy wins because I felt he wins"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 6:10 am
The scorecard is a guideline for judges to go off of, and as a reference for anyone to see why we felt which fighter won. It insures balance. Likewise, having a third judge come in means that in case of split, the judges don't pull some unfair BS to give one guy the win.
But I wouldn't expect you to understand, so I guess I'm just wasting my ******** time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Female of the Species
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 7:03 am
The Female of the Species The scorecard is a guideline for judges to go off of, and as a reference for anyone to see why we felt which fighter won. It insures balance. Likewise, having a third judge come in means that in case of split, the judges don't pull some unfair BS to give one guy the win. But I wouldn't expect you to understand, so I guess I'm just wasting my ******** time. COIN TOSS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 8:07 am
The Female of the Species The scorecard is a guideline for judges to go off of, and as a reference for anyone to see why we felt which fighter won. It insures balance. Likewise, having a third judge come in means that in case of split, the judges don't pull some unfair BS to give one guy the win. But I wouldn't expect you to understand, so I guess I'm just wasting my ******** time. No need to get all pissy >.> I complained because we were absolutely and utterly ignored every time we asked about it. If we were provided even a remote response before I would have been content.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Female of the Species
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 8:20 am
I've posted updates every time I've learned about the situation changing.
And by we, you mean you.
As it stands, and I'm quoting an earlier post here, I'm posting what grades we have tomorrow if this third judge doesn't get his s**t together.
For the disputes, I'm not going the mentally challenged route of adding scores cause I don't feel like ******** over KB in this version of the GTB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
