|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:56 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:56 pm
Red Kutai J 4 C K Lanzer - (G)50
User--Spotlight | Admin
Lit- 3 | "Upcoming features:
Int- 4 | Battle System"
Wit- 4 |
Spam- 2 |
Well?
Hmm. As much as I like his flavour text, why doesn't Lanzer of all people have an effect? (Yes, I do consider him the Lanzer of all people...)
Probably the most basic Lanzer card one could ever own.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:57 pm
J 4 C K Red Kutai J 4 C K Lanzer - (G)50
User--Spotlight | Admin
Lit- 3 | "Upcoming features:
Int- 4 | Battle System"
Wit- 4 |
Spam- 2 |
Well?
Hmm. As much as I like his flavour text, why doesn't Lanzer of all people have an effect? (Yes, I do consider him the Lanzer of all people...)
Probably the most basic Lanzer card one could ever own.
Also, I don't think he'd be a Spotlight and an Admin, just an Admin. Spotlight would be for specific normal Gaia people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:01 pm
Clitical Hit! Meh?
Requirements: "Wit lower than 2"
Target: 'User' battling against the user
Before the actual effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:01 pm
J 4 C K Red Kutai J 4 C K Lanzer - (G)50
User--Spotlight | Admin
Lit- 3 | "Upcoming features:
Int- 4 | Battle System"
Wit- 4 |
Spam- 2 |
Well?
Hmm. As much as I like his flavour text, why doesn't Lanzer of all people have an effect? (Yes, I do consider him the Lanzer of all people...)
Probably the most basic Lanzer card one could ever own.
Well, I did use him to test out a system for using stats to determine price. I got a total of 31, and your price was 30(G), so it seems to work fairly well. Score!
And Clitical, the Spotlight idea was for all unique members of Gaia. Being a Spotlight Admin is what differentiates him from your everyday normal Admin...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:02 pm
J 4 C K Clitical Hit! Meh?
Requirements: "Wit lower than 2"
Target: 'User' battling against the user
Before the actual effect.
Writing these Naruto-style, are we?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:03 pm
Clitical Hit! J 4 C K Red Kutai J 4 C K Lanzer - (G)50
User--Spotlight | Admin
Lit- 3 | "Upcoming features:
Int- 4 | Battle System"
Wit- 4 |
Spam- 2 |
Well?
Hmm. As much as I like his flavour text, why doesn't Lanzer of all people have an effect? (Yes, I do consider him the Lanzer of all people...)
Probably the most basic Lanzer card one could ever own.
Also, I don't think he'd be a Spotlight and an Admin, just an Admin. Spotlight would be for specific normal Gaia people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:04 pm
Red Kutai J 4 C K Clitical Hit! Meh?
Requirements: "Wit lower than 2"
Target: 'User' battling against the user
Before the actual effect.
Writing these Naruto-style, are we?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:04 pm
Red Kutai J 4 C K Clitical Hit! Meh?
Requirements: "Wit lower than 2"
Target: 'User' battling against the user
Before the actual effect.
Writing these Naruto-style, are we?
Naruto-style?
And, this was more for the image than the effect, was just wondering if thats okay for Posts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:06 pm
Clitical Hit! Red Kutai J 4 C K Clitical Hit! Meh?
Requirements: "Wit lower than 2"
Target: 'User' battling against the user
Before the actual effect.
Writing these Naruto-style, are we?
Naruto-style?
And, this was more for the image than the effect, was just wondering if thats okay for Posts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:06 pm
J 4 C K Red Kutai J 4 C K Clitical Hit! Meh?
Requirements: "Wit lower than 2"
Target: 'User' battling against the user
Before the actual effect.
Writing these Naruto-style, are we?
It's alright. We're just kind of spouting ideas right now; we'll get to a point where we try to format everything properly, but we're not there yet...
Yes, Clitical; the Naruto card game is formatted almost exactly the way he mentioned. I think it'll work great for posts... smile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:08 pm
After you mentioned the Wit<2 requirement, I had to go back and check to see if the cards that are meant to use that type of card could. Both "The Troll" and "Flamer" had 0 Wit... biggrin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:09 pm
Red Kutai
After you mentioned the Wit<2 requirement, I had to go back and check to see if the cards that are meant to use that type of card could. Both "The Troll" and "Flamer" had 0 Wit... biggrin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:12 pm
Red Kutai J 4 C K Red Kutai J 4 C K Clitical Hit! Meh?
Requirements: "Wit lower than 2"
Target: 'User' battling against the user
Before the actual effect.
Writing these Naruto-style, are we?
It's alright. We're just kind of spouting ideas right now; we'll get to a point where we try to format everything properly, but we're not there yet...
Yes, Clitical; the Naruto card game is formatted almost exactly the way he mentioned. I think it'll work great for posts... smile
Heh, I've never played to Naruto game, just a coincidence then. And, I'm really not liking the 90 card idea for the first set, just seems like too much. 70 maybe? Also, should we think out all of the cards as a group before making them?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:12 pm
so how about cards that have original names, like "darksoul" it has no numbers so its original and there could be just a few chosen ones. nonthing like R0cker 58. just words no numbers except J.4.C.K . but any way how does the idea sound?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
