|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:12 pm
*makes fun of you so I can get hit by the fan*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:13 pm
Jonath Nell Sorry Ryugi, My dad kicked me off the computer last night. I have already posted so I will just wait around until you post again. I will be watching anime so it may take me a little to figure out that you posted. Ok. As long as you're here now.
|
 |
 |
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:18 pm
Oh, and Nell...
I was meaning your mech's engines would be giving off heat that I could see. I wasn't firing anything at you. The heat I mentioned not being on my mech was from my engines already being cooled by the time I completed those actions. In other words, you wouldn't have any heat to track me by, and I would have heat to track you.
Meaning I'd essentially be invisible to your sensors, while I could still have a bead on you.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:25 pm
And yet with that large weapon you have there would be heat produced. So if it is not on then you are invisable, but if it is they my heat sensors would pick it up. I know you can see me, but I am also making it possable for me to see you in the right situation.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:26 pm
-rips out Ryugi's throat and throws it on a McDonalds grill-
...Dude. Sizzles...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:29 pm
Jonath Nell And yet with that large weapon you have there would be heat produced. So if it is not on then you are invisable, but if it is they my heat sensors would pick it up. I know you can see me, but I am also making it possable for me to see you in the right situation. The weapon wasn't activated Jonath. It wasn't firing. There was no heat emanating from it. At least not any more heat than from normal metal floating in space.
|
 |
 |
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:38 pm
So what you are saying is that the weapon has no heat signature at all. That would mean that it is not active correct. You would need to charge the weapon then before firing.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:46 pm
OoC: "So, I see some type of discussion, most likely pertaining to a role-play, is being carried out here, no? By the way, Ryugi, my Internet got cut out 'fore I could read your response last we were talking. What were saying about my killer move not being legal?
"Oh, and pertaining to HoH, does it count against you if you kill someone but instantly bring them back to life, perfectly fine?"
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:51 pm
It would take a lot of power to bring someone back to life. Is your character a high level healer?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:53 pm
Jonath Nell It would take a lot of power to bring someone back to life. Is your character a high level healer? OoC: "Erm... he takes a bit of their soul via his soul-reaping sword, duplicates it over several posts, and then, upon killing them, returns the duplicated soul to their beaten, mangled, and bruised body. His speciality is dealing with the soul, or ********." xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:54 pm
Jonath Nell So what you are saying is that the weapon has no heat signature at all. That would mean that it is not active correct. You would need to charge the weapon then before firing. I don't have to charge it to fire. I just pull the trigger and an energy blast comes out of it. Not a massive one, but one big enough to do some damage. The weapon HAS a heat signature, but in its current state, it wouldn't show up on a thermal scan as anything harmful.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:58 pm
OoC: "Just putting my two cents in, but anything gives off heat. Otherwise, it would have to be at a temperature of absolute zero, or, in Layman's terms, would have absolutely no particle movement throughout its entirety. Not only would that cause severe instantaneous frost damage, but it would also, under any circumstances, most easily break by even the minutest contact/collision with another object."
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:01 pm
Isaac Cramoisin does it count against you if you kill someone but instantly bring them back to life, perfectly fine?" DISQUALIFICATION. All other points are moot.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:03 pm
Kraun Isaac Cramoisin does it count against you if you kill someone but instantly bring them back to life, perfectly fine?" DISQUALIFICATION. All other points are moot. OoC: "I see, I see. Well then, I've to think of some other way about that annoying rule..."
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|