|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:44 am
Anarchy (from Greek: ἀναρχίᾱ anarchíā, "without ruler") may refer to any of the following: "No rulership or enforced authority."[1] "Absence of government; a state of lawlessness due to the absence or inefficiency of the supreme power; political disorder."[2] "A social state in which there is no governing person or group of people, but each individual has absolute liberty (without the implication of disorder)."[3] "Absence or non-recognition of authority and order in any given sphere."[4] "Act[ing] without waiting for instructions or official permission... The root of anarchism is the single impulse to do it yourself: everything else follows from this." [5] 
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 10:02 am
I'd at least like to see what would happen. If it would be good or bad who knows!?? O.O;
But im pretty sure it would be interesting. ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dreik Pandora Vice Captain
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:12 pm
I don't like anarchy. The leader is needed but a good one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:45 pm
Dreik Pandora I don't like anarchy. The leader is needed but a good one.
I really just think it would be interesting for business. A leader is always needed. So are good subordinates with maintained ranking for the jobs they're each and all best at. Our Guild has no place for anarchy. Nor do we wish it upon our friends such as Yami of course. But with anarchy comes business for people like us.
Aside from that, I believe you’re correct. Too much anarchy is always a problem no matter how you look at it. But a little bit of it here and there is perfect for keeping the natural balance between human beings.
This also can't be helped either way. We, as intelligent beings are but a mortal species built on both control and independent idealism. Meaning that we all naturally want out own way to work in life; some of us are leaders and some of us are followers but neither of these positions are bad.
Leaders create the possibilities and ideas to become better and grow as a race. Followers give each leader the will and desire to keep going as they support and agree upon the dreams of their leaders. And as conflictions occur making new and sometimes greater problems arise. Solutions are eventually found and Eras are created: Each and every one of these Eras, with hopes of making this life better for everyone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:30 pm
i think humans are in need of strong leaders even in a world of anarchy people would gather into groups and they would elect leaders to lead them. weather its by an iron fist of brute strength or a wise and well knowing leader people would still gather for some form of leadership and government.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 12:09 pm
true. I bow before you, Yamo, to show you respect. That was good speech.
I myself am underling type. Although I'm doing duties of Leader half of the time in different places I always remain underling since I have always refused for high power. I am working for others not myself. And I don't want to be leader biggrin
Lol guess I said too much biggrin
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dreik Pandora Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:01 pm
But do you see what a leader has lead us to as people?
It has created blood battles, and for one i'm ok with blood and fighting.
But thats not the point.
We would be free to do what ever we wanted, no laws could harm us, Ok think of your parents
If they were good parents then u need not to read this
If they were asses then please do read:
Parents are also leaders, they have some power over you, but to the people who have power over them.
It's like a chain leading down to the younger generations,
every time a kid of teen messes up it goes on the parents, then to the leaders of them. So yeah I think it'd be better without a leader.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 6:12 pm
individualism, fascism, THOSE are good kinds of governments. collectivism, socialism, those are terribly planned governments. anarchy's fie and all, but it wont change anything, cause well be back to square one, which we already are stepp
ing on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dreik Pandora Vice Captain
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:48 am
Democracy is the best solution. everyone is as important as others yet we all work together.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:18 pm
-.-
NOT WAT I THINK!
I WANT ANARCHY
Down with the leaders!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 6:08 pm
Demetri Rain But do you see what a leader has lead us to as people?
It has created blood battles, and for one i'm ok with blood and fighting.
But thats not the point.
We would be free to do what ever we wanted, no laws could harm us, Ok think of your parents
If they were good parents then u need not to read this
If they were asses then please do read:
Parents are also leaders, they have some power over you, but to the people who have power over them.
It's like a chain leading down to the younger generations,
every time a kid of teen messes up it goes on the parents, then to the leaders of them. So yeah I think it'd be better without a leader.
Do you understand what such a thing as Anarchy would do to a community? Do you truly understand? No rules, no laws, and the ability to do whatever we want may sound fun, but that is a frightening reality. As it is, we make the laws, and we are allowed to do what we want. Consequences follow our actions, nonetheless.
If you truly want anarchy, then it would turn everything upside down. You could be easily killed in an instant, because there would be no morals. Everything would be destroyed, and humanity would wither from this world. You are crazy if you want such a thing...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 6:43 am
Sayge Kitsune
Do you understand what such a thing as Anarchy would do to a community? Do you truly understand? No rules, no laws, and the ability to do whatever we want may sound fun, but that is a frightening reality. As it is, we make the laws, and we are allowed to do what we want. Consequences follow our actions, nonetheless.
If you truly want anarchy, then it would turn everything upside down. You could be easily killed in an instant, because there would be no morals. Everything would be destroyed, and humanity would wither from this world. You are crazy if you want such a thing...
Speaking right man. And Democracy is good because there is no leader yet there is no anarchy. Everyone is equal and can do what ever they want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dreik Pandora Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:47 pm
Sayge Kitsune Demetri Rain But do you see what a leader has lead us to as people?
It has created blood battles, and for one i'm ok with blood and fighting.
But thats not the point.
We would be free to do what ever we wanted, no laws could harm us, Ok think of your parents
If they were good parents then u need not to read this
If they were asses then please do read:
Parents are also leaders, they have some power over you, but to the people who have power over them.
It's like a chain leading down to the younger generations,
every time a kid of teen messes up it goes on the parents, then to the leaders of them. So yeah I think it'd be better without a leader.
Do you understand what such a thing as Anarchy would do to a community? Do you truly understand? No rules, no laws, and the ability to do whatever we want may sound fun, but that is a frightening reality. As it is, we make the laws, and we are allowed to do what we want. Consequences follow our actions, nonetheless.
If you truly want anarchy, then it would turn everything upside down. You could be easily killed in an instant, because there would be no morals. Everything would be destroyed, and humanity would wither from this world. You are crazy if you want such a thing...
Ok, ok fine but I don;t really want a leader. wat if like a few people had the responsibility of eh well idk president er sumthing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 7:08 pm
In simple words, no.
Anarchy has two sides, the light and dark. The light as in it would be sort of fun, and the dark as in, mass havoc, hysteria, lack of order, etc. etc. If you weight the sides of Anarchy, the Dark would outweigh the Light by a landslide. Pain will outweigh the little bit of fun and independence. In anarchy, you will be free from law, but will live in a world with no order. Anarchy is just like begging a Serial Killer and Criminal Mastermind to be tortured for money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 8:01 am
Katterson In simple words, no. Anarchy has two sides, the light and dark. The light as in it would be sort of fun, and the dark as in, mass havoc, hysteria, lack of order, etc. etc. If you weight the sides of Anarchy, the Dark would outweigh the Light by a landslide. Pain will outweigh the little bit of fun and independence. In anarchy, you will be free from law, but will live in a world with no order. Anarchy is just like begging a Serial Killer and Criminal Mastermind to be tortured for money. and u have a problem with dark? I don't. I'm perfectly ok with it :]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
