fabreeze
(?)Community Member
- Posted: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:37:03 +0000
This is my generic post that I used for all the global warming debates I was in. Here it is for all to see.
This was created approximate 3 months before IPCC basically stated said it was statistically significant that the current global warming is not due to natural trends, but of human intervention.

This one doesn't back as far as the other one.

Instrumental Temperature record of the last 150 years.

"Plot showing the variations, and relative stability, of climate during the last 12000 years"


Global warming at this particular point in history is not naturual. There are reasons why temperatures are well above the norm comparing it to the data of the last several millions of years.
we are a society largely dependent on hydrocarbons for everything. Food, clothing, transportation, heating, everything! We are in a unique period in history where we have a abundance of energy. This is because have learned to tap into carbon reserves for power.
By releasing this fixed carbon, we increase CO2 levels which is strongly correlated to temperature.
Natural mechanisms that fix carbon are not even remotely close to the rate we use it up.
We have the technologies to increase the efficiencies in producing energy and reducing carbon release. However it costs effort and money. Thats the clincher.
Ironically, the cost to society in loss of natural wealth and the jobs that could be generated from it far out weighs the few bucks industries save.
Elsemere Island glacier break off. (occured around Dec 2006)
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CANADA_ARCTIC_ICE_BREAK?SITE=ALDOT&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
or
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061229/ap_on_sc/canada_arctic_ice_break
Scientists Say 2007 May Be Warmest Yet
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/B/BRITAIN_GLOBAL_WARMING?SITE=ALDOT&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Oil company literally pays millions of dollars to groups to mislead the public about global warming.
FACT.
Long-Term Global Forecast? Fewer Continents
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/09/science/09geo.html?_r=1&ref=science&oref=slogin
Headline artical for Jan 9, 2007.
Editorial: Global warming? A small few non-believers say no
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/226175_climate29.htm
Chairman: Bush officials misled public on global warming
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/30/congress.climate.ap/index.html
Finally,
On Feb 2, 2007 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has announced in Paris, France:
1.Global warming is occurring
2.The probability that this is caused by natural climatic processes is less than 5%
3.The probability that this is caused by human emissions of greenhouse gases is over 90%
Case Closed.
Also for those who plan to site the Global Warming Swindle, see EliteRP's post on page 8 before replying.
I haven't seen it yet, from what I heard, its was created to exmobile to discredit global warming.
I know your probably thinking "oh no she just didn't!"