I have not yet read 1984, and I have never seen the old movie or any other publication of it, but I've read about the concept of "thought police" and "thought crimes". It seems like 1984 is all the rage, even more so than before, and there are people out there who have said "the world we live in truly Orwellian".
It seems like since the inauguration of the Bush Administration, and the legislation of the PATRIOT ACT, people think that the USA is an Orwellian country. There are people here and there who think that we can be arrested for "thought crimes".
What is a thought crime? And how do thought police carry out their enforcement?
Apparently, there have been so-called "thought police" in modern history. In Japan, circa 1911, there was the Tokko, a supposedly civilian branch with the purpose of enforcing proper thought. And then there came the early-mid 1900's; fascist and communist nations had departments, directorates, and ministries bearing the title of "state security". Some of these could be considered "secret police". Supposedly, these groups, such as the Gestapo, SD, Stasi, KGB, GRU, et cetera are considered "thought police". And now we've got US groups, mostly the FBI, CIA, NSA, and of course the Republican Party, being slammed as "thought police".
What I want to know is...how do you determine thought crime? I'm convinced that there are events that people use as an excuse to label as "thought crime", such as saying you're going to do something. To me, verbal communication is not thought. Or at least, not wholly thought. Thought is mental, consisting of imaginations and such. And we currently do not have the technology to see into an individual's mind. I mean, there are some things I have imagined (but never did) that would normally have me arrested if I did them in person, but I have never been prosecuted or arrested for what I'm thinking in my mind.....and as far as I know, how thought crime is determined in 1984 is that the dystopian government uses omniscience and high-tech means utilized by its secret police. Compared to this, the only thing that comes close is the monitoring of the Internet (which, for the record, is a bigger issue in the PRC than here in the US), but I don't see how catching threatening sentences is considered "thought crime".
To me, there is no such thing, right now anyway, as a legitimate "thought police". I think, and I have not been arrested or tried for anything.
Keep in mind, though, that my beliefs on "thought" are philosophical related; memories are wordless and ultimately difficult to put into words. If anything, memories are between the words and between the pictures.
I want your opinion on this matter, please. I welcome all views.