Keene Maverick
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:10:44 +0000
Darkslider
sheehandan
mremann
Hi, sorry i haven't been on for a long time, so these topics im bringing up may well be old, but:
1) to anyone who knows, is it true that Brigham Young and a guy called Brother Law were completely against polygamy at the beginning?
2) just about the baptisms for the dead... would it be justifiable to say that if you are needed to be baptised before you can be sealed/married in the temple, would this mean that baptism for the dead could be justified as it paves a way for other things to be done?
just wondering.
mremann
1) to anyone who knows, is it true that Brigham Young and a guy called Brother Law were completely against polygamy at the beginning?
2) just about the baptisms for the dead... would it be justifiable to say that if you are needed to be baptised before you can be sealed/married in the temple, would this mean that baptism for the dead could be justified as it paves a way for other things to be done?
just wondering.
mremann
1.) I don't know, Kiritsu could probably help you with that, I'll look it up.
2.) That's... pretty much the whole point of Baptism for the Dead. They also have all the other temple ceremonies for the dead.
3.) I just realized, your name, mremann, is Mr. E Mann. Mystery Man. Heh heh heh.
From my research,
1. No.
2. Again, that is pretty much the point for BftD. The problem with that comes around from the fact that the BoM clearly states that Baptism for the Dead is wrong. As does the bible.
3. Kind of slow today shee? Nah, just kidding. I didn't even bother looking at his name long enough to find that out.
3.) Yeah, I just kept wondering "How the hell do you pronounce that?"
Mrrreeehhmmannnnnnn?
Then I saw it.