Pyropyre
You asked why I brought it up. You are talking about polytheism in LDS doctrine. I'm saying this "form" polytheism is biblically backed up. Where as your "form" of polytheism is accually not biblically backed up, but was made by Catholic because they believed they had the authority to make it.
I asked why the Trinity was brought up. Was there something that provoked the topic before Boxy said anything? And you may believe that what I believe is not Biblical, even though I get my references from the Bible. But save that for some other day.
Pyropyre
Your problem with the LDS Godhead originates from your foundational belief in the Trinity, right? That is why the Trinity was brought up.
I'm not a fan of the LDS, nor its teachings, and I don't see how the topic came up, unless I repeat myself again, "Was there something that provoked the topic before Boxy said anything?"
Pyropyre
redface Really, what was it that I said that was wrong? I know you think God is three forms and three persons and are yet one substance and one being.
There you go again. I don't think that God is three forms. That's not even Trinity-like to say. I believe that the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God, all God, not 1/3 of God, but fully God. That is, three persons, one substance. One "what" and three "who's." All co-equal, all co-eternal. Not three Father's, but one Father; not three Son's, but one Son; not three Holy Spirit's, but one Holy Spirit. One God, not three. One Lord, not three. I believe only in one God, not three, or many. For if I were to believe that there were three God's, then I would be a tritheist, and thus, this for my part, would be a Trinitarian heresy.
Pyropyre
You don't have to go into detail, but if you could, or somebody just point out one thing in particular.
Sorry about that.
sweatdrop I kind of got carried away.