Welcome to Gaia! ::

Do you think you will get married?

Yes 0.5114006514658 51.1% [ 157 ]
No 0.091205211726384 9.1% [ 28 ]
Maybe 0.30944625407166 30.9% [ 95 ]
I don't belief in marriage 0.087947882736156 8.8% [ 27 ]
Total Votes:[ 307 ]
<< < 1 2 ... 19 20 21
I would love to be in a happy marriage, something old-fashioned.

The wife can work to her heart's content, sure, but I'd love it if I could say, "Honey, I'm home!"

But married people are sadly a minority.
At least they could get jobs easier on the basis of affirmative action.
Black Carpathia
For me, marraige is pointless and accomplishes nothing outside the realm of legalities. I don't like the idea of marraige nor do I intend on getting married. It just seems pointless to me.

I don't think marraige has anything to offer spiritually, morally, or emotionally that can't be acheived in a non-marital relationship. I don't think you need marraige to have kids, to strengthen your bond, and deffinetly not to prove love.

If me and my partner truely love eachother, then it will be proven daily through how we act with eachother. I don't need to be legally bound to someone to know they love me.

With this view, it goes without saying that I deffinetly don't think you need to be married to have sex. Hell, I don't even think you need to be in love. Aslong as all parties are consenting, protected, and know eachother's motives, then they can ******** all they want. Although my days of one night stands are over, I don't see the problem with other people partaking in them.

As for others, they should get married when they are ready, not because they want to finally have "moral" sex, not for money, and not because they think it will make their relationship better and their problems disappear. They should be ready for marriage and all it entails.

I don't really care if people get married or not. I don't care if thepeople getting married are gay, straight, trans, or any other sexuality. I don't care if there are more than two people getting maried to eachother. Just whatever floats your boat.


hey, you think the same way i do on this issue.
what do you think of them married people
approving it because it gives them "benefits"??
no wait, what do you think of the benefits themselves??
dont they tempt you??
In my opinion: Marriage= heart + heart
End of story.
Black Carpathia
For me, marraige is pointless and accomplishes nothing outside the realm of legalities. I don't like the idea of marraige nor do I intend on getting married. It just seems pointless to me.

I don't think marraige has anything to offer spiritually, morally, or emotionally that can't be acheived in a non-marital relationship. I don't think you need marraige to have kids, to strengthen your bond, and deffinetly not to prove love.

If me and my partner truely love eachother, then it will be proven daily through how we act with eachother. I don't need to be legally bound to someone to know they love me.

With this view, it goes without saying that I deffinetly don't think you need to be married to have sex. Hell, I don't even think you need to be in love. Aslong as all parties are consenting, protected, and know eachother's motives, then they can ******** all they want. Although my days of one night stands are over, I don't see the problem with other people partaking in them.

As for others, they should get married when they are ready, not because they want to finally have "moral" sex, not for money, and not because they think it will make their relationship better and their problems disappear. They should be ready for marriage and all it entails.

I don't really care if people get married or not. I don't care if thepeople getting married are gay, straight, trans, or any other sexuality. I don't care if there are more than two people getting maried to eachother. Just whatever floats your boat.


I couldn't have said it any better myself. I see marriage mainly as a social tool used for religious, legal, and economic reasons. Also, not so much now, but in the past marriage has also been used for political reasons. Think back to ancient or medieval times. There are many examples of men from powerful families marrying women from others to forage alliances, enforce the legitimacy of future heirs, and other similar reasons.

One thing I can't stand about marriage in some cultures/societies/religious views is that of the woman submitting to the man. I highly disagree with this. A woman is a person. A man is a person. They're the same in my view. Equals. One is not better than the other. Thus, in a relationship they should both contribute equally to the relationship as well as be treated equally by the other person. By "equal" I don't necessarily mean exactly 50/50, but an agreement must be reached in which the two people involved in the relationship are happy with how much effort each person puts into the relationship. A person should not be forced to behave or do a certain amount of work in the relationship if they are not comfortable with it or feel they are unable to live up to the other person's standards.
I want to wait until I accomplish my goals in life before I settle down and marry someone.
sorry but marriage was created before Christianity people just made them related
i am going to get marrie to this guy that is nice likes kids and SEXY
Tropical Wilds
goldmule2
It seems to me that she has lived with a successful marriage her entire life. You can see how it is done by watching those that succeed.


My parents have been married for almost 30 years. Being from a successful marriage and seeing that dynamic isn't at all like being actually married. Being from a successful marriage doensn't give you near all the skills required to actually HAVE a successful marriage. And like I said, while there are all sorts of fun, bumper sticker phrases you can throw out there... "never go to bed angry," "be my best friend and my best lover," and "take off your mask," etc etc, those simple, black and white statements are just that... Over-generalized, black and white statements that sound really good on a bumpersticker, and that's about it.

Quote:
She seems to have a better understanding of what causes marriages to fail than those who get married and fail. You have to spend time with someone and not just have "good sex."


More overgeneralized garbage, designed to make people think they're immune to getting a divorce. People who get divorced may have a great understanding of what causes marriages to fail. People who get divorced may have spent a ton of time with their spouse, and had something in common other than "good sex." It'd be so easy to say that the reasons people divorce is because they spend no time together, are sex-obsessed with nothing in common other than sex, who enter into marriage on a whim with no idea on how to make a successful union. That way, divorce is all the fault of the people getting divorced for being too stupid to hold it together, instead of what it is... Something that can happen to any married couple. It can happen even to people who have a lot in common, are together all the time, who're invested in the relationship and their family. People change, circumstances change, so many things can happen, even to those who are well versed in fun little one-liner phrases that supposedly solve the complex issues of marriage in 10 words or less.

Quote:
If longevity is what is important to you then I have been married for over 20 years. My parents, all my mother's sisters, her parents and her father's parents were/are married over 50 years. Most of my older cousins have been married for over 20 years. The only few divorces until this generation were because of abuse.


Then you should know better than to say marriage and what makes it successful can be summed up in 5 words.

Quote:
I have seen troubled marriages among these that they worked together to make them work and I have seen marriages that the love and commitment just overwhelmed you with its beauty.


I've seen troubled marriages too, where the people worked to "make the marriage work." They're hardly beautiful marriages we should all stive to have.

As for the marriages where "the love and commitment just overwhelmed with it's beauty," I've seen those too... But I was generally young and naive and didn't have the awarness it took to realize that even those "beautiful marriages" had problems (they just occured where it couldn't be seen) and my willingness to see the world as a Disney movie, while ignoring the actual real-life particulars of said relationship. Even if they were great marriages, they couldn't be degraded to the point of applying silly little catchphrases to sum them up.

Quote:
Also, don't ever expect to always agree with the one that you love. You may have to agree to disagree about some stuff. It is the working together on your solutions that matters.


More bumpersticker philosophy that sounds good on a forum, but doesn't actually mean diddly in a marriage.


The major reason for the majority of divorce is laziness. The people were too lazy to get to know each other beyond the "now" of the initial chemistry. They were too lazy to make time for togetherness so that they grew together and not apart. They were too lazy to work when a problem comes up that could be repaired if they put a little effort into it.

They have this illusion that loving someone means that they will go out of their way to give you what you want. When they do not they are fast to fall out of love. Sometimes bumper sticker philosophy is actual facts that people do not want to face because it is too much work.

It is so much easier to not put any effort into it and then claim that no harm comes from it if you abandon the relationship. Wrong, there are just as many bad feelings and fights over property and children as when you divorce. Where do you think Palimony came from?

I see as much or more problems from couples having more than one partner when it comes to the parentage of their children. The arguments of the mother of the man's first child screaming at the mothers of all his later children over anything from her child not getting an even share of his support to their stealing her man. How child(ren)from an earlier man is(are) less cuddled, belittled or ignored by the latest man in the mother's life as his child(ren) are clearly favored sometimes even by their mother to keep on the good side of the man.

Marriages do not make themselves.
Tropical Wilds
Sarobie
Two ppl of the same sex don't need to be together God didn't create Adam and Steve, He created Eve for Adam, a woman so he could have companionship.If two men were meant to be together then He would not have made women.I'm non-denominational and the Bible says thats an abbomination. I treat everyone with kindness regardless of the way they roll but I'm not for it .But I will continue to keep up my hopes of finding someone decent.


Sure, God supposedly created Adam and Eve, but Adam and Eve were kicked out of Eden for having sex and were the cause of man falling out of the grace of God. Seems God isn't too happy about heterosexual relationships, either... Maybe Adam and Steve is the way to go.
Everything you said is soo wrong .They were kiked out of the Garden of Eden for eating the forbidden fruit .Read your Bible for the whole true story.
I want to know this: If two gay guys were to get married, would they stop giving oral as well? gonk

Quick Reply

Submit
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum