OoO C o o L I o OoO
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 01:30:31 +0000
Feyre
xxSoviet Ghost
Boxknight Jace
xxSoviet Ghost
Boxknight Jace
xmiss_ann_thropex
True but I think what the OP is getting at is that the victims don't realize that they need to take responsibility as well. Obviously the rapist is responsible for most of the actions; however, some victims don't realize that, by putting themselves in that kind of position, they're to blame as well.
Do you really mean that? The victim is responsible for something done to her because the circumstance wasn't the best? Say she's drunk, and she accepts a walk home from an acquaintance. He's a friend of a friend, and she'd been flirting with him. He doesn't take "good night" as an answer, so because she let him walk her home alone she has to take part of the blame? Explain how this makes sense.
She didn't HAVE to get drunk. If she wasn't drunk, then more likely then not, she would have better judgment about the situation, and probably travel home with someone she trusts more often.
In essence, it was slightly the victim's fault for putting themselves in that spot.
So because she got herself drunk, getting raped was her fault? I don't follow. Drinking is a common social activity. Drinking too much isn't recommended, but it doesn't mean that she can be blamed for getting raped.
whoa, whoa, whoa. You misunderstood what I said. I said it was slightly the victim's fault. I never said it was completely the victim's fault. The perpetrator is just as at fault, but the victim isn't entirely left out of the blame game.
No one can be blamed for someone else's actions, it's ridiculous, not even "slighty" and certainly not "just as".
Worse, that kind of thinking can have horrible consequences on rape victims.
No one can be blamed for someone else's actions?
So...all those people who go to jail for a crime they didn't commit don't exist?