Suicidesoldier#1
(?)Community Member
Fanatical Zealot
Offline
- Report Post
- Posted: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:43:21 +0000
AsuraSyn
foxxykitty27
AsuraSyn
foxxykitty27
Suicidesoldier#1
foxxykitty27
What you are assuming is that one day we will either understand God or science will reach a point where everything can be explained, thus replacing the "zero" that you are calling God. I believe neither is possible so I can't agree with your comparison.
Or perhaps simply that our existence at all implies the existence of some kind of meaning? ninja
Life's purpose cannot be explained by science or logic. You can't explain to me why this specific speck of dust landed on my shoulder and if there was a reason for it to do so.
Chaos.
Psh
What happens happens, not because it had to, but because it did.
That speck of dust landed on your shoulder because it DID land on your shoulder. This is the plane of reality in which that happened. That's why it happened.
Or was there a purpose, or a guidance, by some higher plane of existence, or even such a being existing there, in control of many aspects of this universe, say from the 5th dimension, or whom formed before the laws of physics did?
In an environment of absolute nothingness, you would find pure chaos; given enough time, everything would happen. In that time, the most powerful entity would take control, like with sentience, and then establish order; once order was established, order would never revert into chaos. Thus while chaos will inevitability lead to order, ultimate order, like mass cannot be created or destroyed and so on, will perpetuate itself by it's very nature. Thus chaos creates order, and order perpetuates itself endlessly. And yet, during this time, it would be possible, if not plausible, for what we understand as a God to arrive. Not exactly like the Gods we're used to, but similar enough.
Interestingly enough, Occam's razor does describe something about the universe, but not the way it believes. While it suggest simplicity is the inherent likelihood of the universe, thus disproving God, the very existence of ourselves, instead of nothing, defies the idea of simplicity; the presence of the laws of physics, of the sun, of the intricate nature of the universe, defies the occam's razor; being alive is likely one of the least complex things that could exist. Yet in biology, our designs are predicated on efficiency, to be as efficient as possible, when you look at fish, flying birds, and so on. This is based on the concept of entropy, which is itself based on the idea of equivalent exchange. Matter cannot be created or destroyed, nor energy, more or less we exist in a universe of scarcity, where to do anything requires sacrifice, or the equivalent exchange.
Thus while everything is finely balanced on an infinitely thin razor, with equality a basis of life, the notion that something too big would fall off isn't necessarily true, just something unbalanced. While the intuition says something too big would be hard to balance, our universe innately makes it impossible to be unequal, and thus things like the sun, can exist (although they aren't perfect spheres due to their rotation). Thus the core nature of the universe is balance, which is also equal to a sphere. Which justifies Karma. Perhaps not an 8 manned god but we're getting close to some core concepts of religion.
Also I can divide by zero.
