Welcome to Gaia! ::

What should the creatures of "Twilight" be reclassified as?

Chupacabras 0.34375 34.4% [ 11 ]
Sparklepires 0.3125 31.2% [ 10 ]
Meyerpires 0.09375 9.4% [ 3 ]
Fairies 0.09375 9.4% [ 3 ]
Other cryptoid species (TBD) 0.15625 15.6% [ 5 ]
Total Votes:[ 32 ]
1

Beloved Seeker

6,025 Points
  • Person of Interest 200
  • Conventioneer 300
  • First step to fame 200
I am composing this thread (and above poll) for the purposes of politely addressing a nagging issue I have with the Twilight series, written by Stephanie Meyer. Now, I have consulted the official sticky thread for their thoughts on the subject of my inquiry, and have gotten sufficient enough a response that I will now ask the general community for their input. As long as the TOS is followed, I am willing to allow further discussion; I understand that there are several (thousand) opinions on the subject of the entire series, but I would like this thread to focus on a very minute, specific matter.

The matter in question?

I would like to modestly propose a reclassification of Stephanie Meyer's so-called "vampires." Since they do not adhere to the conventional, or even traditional, descriptions or behaviors of vampires, wampyrs or nosferatu, I posit that Ms. Meyer's creatures are, in fact, an evolved variant species of chupacabras.

Exhibit A: Poor or sub-par social skills (i.e. predatory stalking, stilted conversational ability, tendencies toward physical violence as a means of conflict resolution, etc.) are indicative of the creatures' possession of over-active fight-or-flight instincts (which, if I recall, are controlled by the area of the brain commonly referred to as the "lizard brain" wink ).

Exhibit B: The source of plasma consumption (via human, cow, goat, etc.) appear to be a matter of personal preference and/or animosity. The Cullens, for example, appear to exhibit little animosity towards humans and therefore choose to consume other non-human sources of plasma. Other creatures who drink human blood? Well, they're probably just misanthropes who bear no ill will against cows or goats, or have some unfortunate allergic reactions to cloven-footed animals. Or they're jerks. Whatever.

Exhibit C: The "glitter" in the creatures' skins is obviously a more highly-evolved form of reptilian scales, conceiled under a thin veneer of what barely passes for an epidermal layer.

Exhibit D: Repetitive behavioral patterns (i.e. following obsessive pursuits, participating in ritualistic games, practicing bulimia, continuing useless hobbies, going back to the same job or school over and over and over, etc.) appear to indicate a means for the creatures to "blend in" (ala chameleons) with humanity, while still engaging their over-active "lizard brains" in non-violent activity in order to best avoid exposure.

On that last note I give you...

Exhibit E: The highly secretive nature of the creatures and their systemmatic avoidance of authority figures (i.e. police) are more likely due to fears of not only exposure, but also capture and possibly deportation.

Because, by all rights, chupacabras belong in their native habitat and should not be crossing any borders without the proper visas and passports (although I'm sure your average customs agent would freak out and alert the National Security Agency on general principle). Also, they definitely need their shots, especially if they have ever been exposed to potentially dangerous bacteria or viruses.

In closing, there's nothing inherently wrong with being a chupacabra in a people-suit. JUST ADMIT IT!

stressed

...

There. I said it. Discuss.
chupacabras
Blaze of Light
chupacabras

I second that

8,150 Points
  • Invisibility 100
  • Bunny Hoarder 150
  • Elocutionist 200
Why not succubi and incubi? I mean, look at how they're defined:

-Demons in male/female form
-Pursue relationships with humans
-Identified by cold sexual organs
-Intercourse with a succubus/incubus can result in deteriorating health or death
-Often prey on humans while they're sleeping—yeah, "watching" her sleep... latent incubusness?

Plus, succubi and incubi have been closely associated with vampires over the years. The sparkling could just be something used to lure in the weaker-minded humans... the drinking of human blood is apparently unnecessary for Twilight's "vamps", and is limited to the succubi and incubi in Forks who have deluded themselves into thinking they're vampires.

Dapper Smoker

I call them glitters.
User Image

Thirteenth Survivor

7,225 Points
  • Dressed Up 200
  • Treasure Hunter 100
  • Citizen 200
I feel your arguments are sound. Those things have more in common with chupacabras than nosferatu, although I would say they are apparently operating under the delusion that they are "vampires." But that could be part of their sociopathic tendencies.

I vote chupacabra.

Beloved Seeker

6,025 Points
  • Person of Interest 200
  • Conventioneer 300
  • First step to fame 200
Uerian
Why not succubi and incubi? I mean, look at how they're defined:

-Demons in male/female form
-Pursue relationships with humans
-Identified by cold sexual organs
-Intercourse with a succubus/incubus can result in deteriorating health or death
-Often prey on humans while they're sleeping—yeah, "watching" her sleep... latent incubusness?

Plus, succubi and incubi have been closely associated with vampires over the years. The sparkling could just be something used to lure in the weaker-minded humans... the drinking of human blood is apparently unnecessary for Twilight's "vamps", and is limited to the succubi and incubi in Forks who have deluded themselves into thinking they're vampires.


You do have several good points. I'm not entirely sure I agree with the "pursuing relationships with humans" part, if only because it appears that the majority of the creatures tend to partner up with each other after they've undergone the transition.

Or so wikipedia tells me.

I have a feeling that, if one were to classify them, the basic root words of succubus and incubus would probably appear in their latin name.

Beloved Seeker

6,025 Points
  • Person of Interest 200
  • Conventioneer 300
  • First step to fame 200
Preacher Josh Monreaux
User Image


For breakfast, eh? Do they taste like chicken or pixie sticks? blaugh

Malevolent Inquisitor

13,650 Points
  • Brandisher 100
  • PvP 200
  • Conversationalist 100
I do not believe that they are chupacabras, I think if anything they would relate more to some mythical Scottish or Irish creatures. There are a few –cannot remember their name at the moment- that are legend to sparkle and take human form, they often feed on animals and humans, and are sometimes thought to be in relations with human for long periods of time. But there is also one thing that you did not take into account, the fact that they can turn other into “vampires” chupacabras cannot do that AND the small scales thing does not explain the sparkle unless they secret something to make them sparkle. Also the cold part is a big aspect. I think that the closest one could get to renaming these creatures would be Incubi or Succubus. I would like to think though that this subject is not so important that it would be taken seriously. It is interesting though the many different mythical creatures that seemed to have been brought together to create these so called vampires.

Romantic Lunatic

Ahh- no baby eating?

Quick Reply

Submit
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum