|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 6:38 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:18 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 9:35 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 9:42 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:24 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 1:04 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 2:00 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 8:32 am
|
|
|
|
I suppose that I am reminded of 'Fear Her', now that I think about it, with it all involving little children and aliens. I found it funny, most of the time, but they could have actually played out a more, I don't know, complex enemy. The best weapons were all used at the end, but I find that if the enemy was more than just an alien child's fears, then we might have a bit more suspense. Maybe that was what was wrong with it. Think about it, the Daleks, the Silence, and the Cybermen. The more complex villains more often than not, have two-episode arcs. That is, if they have more than a cameo (my example would be the cameos of the Silurians, Daleks, Judoon, Cybermen, Sontarans, and not doubt other species I didn’t recognize at the end of the first episode featuring the Pandorica). Now, if the fears that the alien child possessed had posed any more of a threat to the Doctor and his companions and allies, then we might have had to have gone on for two episodes. But that’s the thing; they weren’t really that much of a threat. If they were, the Doctor’s ‘trump cards’ might not have worked half as well as they were supposed to.
Anyway, with the enemy being deemed as a fail at being anything more than a small obstacle as compared to anything else the Doctor has faced, let’s talk about the actors. Matt Smith is, in my opinion, as brilliant as ever. As with Karen Gillan and Arthur Darvill (Rory’s near breakdown when talking about light is hilarious). Daniel Mays also put up a brilliant performance as Alex, the worried father (‘You’re not from social services, are you?’ I absolutely loved the utter confusion and realization he put into that line), and Jamie Oram, also known as the boy George who suffers from pantaphobia (did I spell that right?), put so much fear and love into his lines (a great actor for a child). I have no complaints when it comes to the performances the actors put into this episode.
Now, since the serious work is done, a small observation to what I’ve seen: A small continuity error. Towards the end, when Alex and George are embracing in the doll’s house, I noticed that when Daniel’s back is towards the camera, Jamie’s left arm is on Daniel’s right shoulder. However, when Jamie’s back is to the camera, his arm isn’t on Daniel’s shoulder anymore.
Sorry, I ramble. redface smile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 5:57 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 9:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:20 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 1:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 1:39 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 7:30 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|