|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:38 pm
|
|
|
|
Celeblin Galadeneryn demisara So there's no term that we can use to refer to a cross-cultural occurrence of similar spiritual practices by similar people in their respective cultures that may or may not be related practices? Maybe a better question would be, are the practices of the Shamans, the Seidr, etc etc related? Can we speak about them as one group of people? When they journey do they go to similar places or are the otherworlds culturally contained? Does anyone know if these traditions developed independently of each other? That one's probably lost to history, but is there any traceable cultural diffusion at work in the details? Do I know if North Asian religions containing Shaman and Norse Seidhr developed independently of each other? Not definitively, but I'm going to give a yes simply because of distance and difference of ethno-linguo group. Which is to say I'm pretty sure, but I couldn't prove it without a doubt. Is there any traceable diffusion? Not particularly. They aren't provably related. They're similar, but that doesn't mean anything. I can name quite a few similarities between European and Aztec religion, but it doesn't make them related. The only real way we can group them together is to say they have an otherworld tradition. Why we have to call all people of otherworld traditions Shaman is beyond me. Why aren't we using the world Volva instead?
Volva?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:53 am
|
|
|
|
ShadowCatSoul Celeblin Galadeneryn demisara So there's no term that we can use to refer to a cross-cultural occurrence of similar spiritual practices by similar people in their respective cultures that may or may not be related practices? Maybe a better question would be, are the practices of the Shamans, the Seidr, etc etc related? Can we speak about them as one group of people? When they journey do they go to similar places or are the otherworlds culturally contained? Does anyone know if these traditions developed independently of each other? That one's probably lost to history, but is there any traceable cultural diffusion at work in the details? Do I know if North Asian religions containing Shaman and Norse Seidhr developed independently of each other? Not definitively, but I'm going to give a yes simply because of distance and difference of ethno-linguo group. Which is to say I'm pretty sure, but I couldn't prove it without a doubt. Is there any traceable diffusion? Not particularly. They aren't provably related. They're similar, but that doesn't mean anything. I can name quite a few similarities between European and Aztec religion, but it doesn't make them related. The only real way we can group them together is to say they have an otherworld tradition. Why we have to call all people of otherworld traditions Shaman is beyond me. Why aren't we using the world Volva instead? Volva? Women, generally, who practice seidhr, along with spa and galdhr. With the Norse it's more common for women to practice than men, though men aren't exactly rare as practitioners. It has more to do with how the Norse saw magic and gender roles.
Basically, it's a similar position in Norse society as the Shaman is in Altaic society. Yet we've appropriated the Altaic word.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 1:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:04 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:54 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:54 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:18 am
|
|
|
|
Celeblin Galadeneryn TeaDidikai Celeblin Galadeneryn Besides, the "barbarian horde" isn't enlightened. That's saved for British Monks. Not sure this comments much upon Victorian Historical Revisionism. wink Is getting me started on 19th Germans really the way we want to go about this? I know I would be amused.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 2:41 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 2:55 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|