|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 9:29 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 8:59 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:20 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:30 pm
|
|
|
|
Forgedawn Do you mean that (in the book example) the thing is just not a book, or some sort of opposite? I can see this mainly as an emphasis as has been said--much like in Russian using the genitive case when something isn't present. Russian: He wasn't there: On ne byl tam (He not was there) He wasn't there [[He was absent from there]]: Evo ne bylo tam (There was not him) Maybe I am slow, but I am not quite getting the emphasis... help?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:12 am
|
|
|
|
JeSuisMustapha Forgedawn Do you mean that (in the book example) the thing is just not a book, or some sort of opposite? I can see this mainly as an emphasis as has been said--much like in Russian using the genitive case when something isn't present. Russian: He wasn't there: On ne byl tam (He not was there) He wasn't there [[He was absent from there]]: Evo ne bylo tam (There was not him) Maybe I am slow, but I am not quite getting the emphasis... help? I think that he means this:
He wasn't there: meaning "he wasn't in that exact location but he was still there. Elvis was in the building but not in that room."
and
He wasn't there: meaning "he wasn't in the location at all, he wasn't even there at all. Elvis was not in the building at all."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 7:29 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:33 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 2:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|