|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 6:27 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 7:43 am
|
|
|
|
Kirby_Komatose Grey Gardens Kirby_Komatose Hahahahaha! It's hilarious how you can say that and smile! As a response to the thread...I think a part of me just died inside... emo I said it with a smile so you guys didn't get the idea that I was going to go kill them or something. Or maybe the smile just fueled that idea, lol?
I whole-heartedly agree! They ruined my year by delaying the release! If we killed them though...who else would make/produce/release the movies? Hmm, quite a dilema we find ourselves in.
They can find another company to finace the movies in a heartbeat. Warners doesn't produce the movie, an actual person does that razz They do, obviously release it to, and advertise it, but like I said, they can find another company to do that quickly.
Also... An extremely huge reason why Batman even made so much money was because of Heath Ledger's death earlier this year and since the other movie he was working on obviously isn't coming out anytime soon, everyone wanted to see him.
Plus, last year Harry Potter beat tons of records in terms of most money ever maid in a film so it's not like the fanbase is declining. Hey, they may now even lose money by pushing it back soo god damn long now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 1:20 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 7:00 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minerva the Bookwyrm Crew
|
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 3:24 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:52 am
|
|
|
|
KatieInTheBox Scotties MiaKitty AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!Are you kidding? Please say you're kidding? Please say this is all a cruel joke!!! HOW DARE THEY!!!! *sigh* although... The Dark Knight was pretty awesome.. But how can they expect to compete with Batman? Batman's been around since like, what, the 60's? 50's? Harry Potter is a big deal,yeah, but it's not a big deal that's spread over practically every generation that's currently living! AND THEY'RE BUMPING IT BACK FOR THAT?! Popular since the 50's, he first appear in a comic in 1939. Also they don't want to compete with Dark Night for movie awards. By moving it back a year, they move into the next year's awards.
Lol... Harry Potter is rarely ever up for any actual major movie awards that the Dark Knight will be.
It's all to make more money, don't let them fool you lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 9:22 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 10:40 am
|
Goddess Of The Impossible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 10:58 am
|
|
|
|
Grey Gardens KatieInTheBox Scotties MiaKitty AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!Are you kidding? Please say you're kidding? Please say this is all a cruel joke!!! HOW DARE THEY!!!! *sigh* although... The Dark Knight was pretty awesome.. But how can they expect to compete with Batman? Batman's been around since like, what, the 60's? 50's? Harry Potter is a big deal,yeah, but it's not a big deal that's spread over practically every generation that's currently living! AND THEY'RE BUMPING IT BACK FOR THAT?! Popular since the 50's, he first appear in a comic in 1939. Also they don't want to compete with Dark Night for movie awards. By moving it back a year, they move into the next year's awards. Lol... Harry Potter is rarely ever up for any actual major movie awards that the Dark Knight will be. It's all to make more money, don't let them fool you lol.
I thought for the actors, and staff. Best director, best actor, best effects, that kind of thing all shared the same award. neutral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:48 am
|
|
|
|
KatieInTheBox Grey Gardens KatieInTheBox Scotties MiaKitty AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!Are you kidding? Please say you're kidding? Please say this is all a cruel joke!!! HOW DARE THEY!!!! *sigh* although... The Dark Knight was pretty awesome.. But how can they expect to compete with Batman? Batman's been around since like, what, the 60's? 50's? Harry Potter is a big deal,yeah, but it's not a big deal that's spread over practically every generation that's currently living! AND THEY'RE BUMPING IT BACK FOR THAT?! Popular since the 50's, he first appear in a comic in 1939. Also they don't want to compete with Dark Night for movie awards. By moving it back a year, they move into the next year's awards. Lol... Harry Potter is rarely ever up for any actual major movie awards that the Dark Knight will be. It's all to make more money, don't let them fool you lol. I thought for the actors, and staff. Best director, best actor, best effects, that kind of thing all shared the same award. neutral
Yes... They do. But Harry Potter is rarely ever up for any of those... That's what I said.
Yes, they do win awards in lesser known mostly British awards but I don't think it happens very often.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:08 am
|
|
|
|
Grey Gardens KatieInTheBox Grey Gardens KatieInTheBox Scotties MiaKitty AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!Are you kidding? Please say you're kidding? Please say this is all a cruel joke!!! HOW DARE THEY!!!! *sigh* although... The Dark Knight was pretty awesome.. But how can they expect to compete with Batman? Batman's been around since like, what, the 60's? 50's? Harry Potter is a big deal,yeah, but it's not a big deal that's spread over practically every generation that's currently living! AND THEY'RE BUMPING IT BACK FOR THAT?! Popular since the 50's, he first appear in a comic in 1939. Also they don't want to compete with Dark Night for movie awards. By moving it back a year, they move into the next year's awards. Lol... Harry Potter is rarely ever up for any actual major movie awards that the Dark Knight will be. It's all to make more money, don't let them fool you lol. I thought for the actors, and staff. Best director, best actor, best effects, that kind of thing all shared the same award. neutral Yes... They do. But Harry Potter is rarely ever up for any of those... That's what I said. Yes, they do win awards in lesser known mostly British awards but I don't think it happens very often.
Point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:16 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 6:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 1:18 pm
|
|
|
|
For me, it's not having to wait longer for the film that's upsetting. It's the utter disregard for the fans who've made Harry Potter the phenomenon it is.
I know that "The fans should be treated better than this! We made HP what it is today!" is a ridiculous argument that's used too often, and I hate it when it's applied to JKR, who owes us precisely nothing. If it weren't for her genius, I don't know what I'd obsess over. She can do what she wants with Harry Potter because it's hers.
WB, on the other hand, have basically been leeching off JKR's creativity and the fact that there were already millions of fans ready to hand over hideous amounts of money for anything even tangentially Potter-related. Yes, Warner bought the rights and can do as they please with the franchise. It doesn't mean that they should, when they rely on a group of people who are, for the most part, fans of Joanne Rowling's work, not theirs. An exchange of money does not buy anyone the loyalty of this rabid fangirl the people who loved the books. Warner Bros have not earned the right to mess with us like this and it's just inconsiderate to string us along. But that's big business for you. Money is more important than anything else.
*steps off soapbox* Wow, that was more... impassioned than I intended it to be. I might just count to ten next time I'm angry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|