|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 7:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 7:08 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 7:10 pm
|
|
|
|
nikki_is_me I have to say that this is quite a bit to take in. I understand what you are saying about the secrecy of the religion and how that affected the spread of the ENP being called Wicca. I get that books are made to make money as well and not everything you read is true, it is just quite a shock to have someone pop up and say 'hey, that isn't Wicca, that is something completely opposite of what our religion is.' I am horribly curious about everything in general so which books would you recommend I read if I were to go looking for something about what Wicca actually is? Thanks for explaining all this. smile
One way to look at it is it sort of step back and look at all the books you may have read with the word "Wicca" in the title, and compare what they're teaching. Are the beliefs and practices therein consistent enough to comprise one religion?
Most books are talking about something completely valid (it's not so much that it's untrue as that it's incorrectly labelled), but what they consider Wicca can differ really widely. Two gods, a circle and a rede doesn't seem much to tie them all together.... and then when you start getting down to it, many people who think of themselves as Wiccan don't hold ritual in a ritual circle (or don't hold ritual at all, for whatever reason) and different people actually worship different gods in place of that god and that goddess, and the rede is just advice anyway.
"The Witches' Bible" by Janet and Stewart Farrar is great, because while it doesn't include any actual Wiccan rituals it gives you a good taste of what Wicca is. Gerald Gardner's good, as is Vivanne Crowley's "Wicca: the Old Religion in the New Millennium". Patricia Crowther too, I think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:44 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 9:29 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:37 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:08 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 11:01 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 5:46 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 9:13 am
|
|
|
|
Mistress Moxy I presented this information to my fellow Wiccan friends,and this is what they had to say: "Initiary, Oathbound, Lineage, Mystery religion, Witchcult, and Priesthood are all bullshit and are untrue. Certain covens may enforce these, but there's a good chance they won't. However there are some things you keep private, such as direct communication from the God and Goddess [or your gods, depending on your particular path] and your Book of Shadows. Not ever Wiccan is a Witch. Not every Witch is Wiccan. I don't know what "." is supposed to be, but sometimes a specific god and goddess or a group of certain gods and goddesses will contact you or "call to you". I know I've had the Egyptians calling to me and I'm quite comfortable with them being my deities. Where did you hear all of this rubbish anyway? " "Yeah, where? =/ That's rediculous. If you had to be initaiated, there wouldn't be solitary practitioners. Like Chandra said, some things are meant to be kept private. Only exeption with my BOS outside of this cult is with my fiance and my close Wiccan friends because we share information all the time. We don't nib s**t, we always ask or offer before looking. But yeah, the first six are all a load of crap. I've never read about them being law; just how they were garbage." Please stop feeding Gaians your trash. All the covens founded by Gardner, the founder of Wicca say otherwise. Please present something from someone that can trace initiation back to Gardner that says otherwise or, even better, produce something from Gardner that says otherwise then we might take you seriously. You could also refute Ronald Hutton's thesis that Gerald Gardner is the founder of Wicca. This topic has been debated to death and this is the conclusion concerning Wicca we have come to. If you wish to bring some new information to the table then be my guest. But until then this is the definition of Wicca as it stands.
There's nothing wrong with being a Neo-Pagan, or any other kind of Pagan. There's nothing wrong with being dedicated to different Gods other than the Lord and Lady of the Isle. There are plenty of Gods to choose from or to not choose any at all. There are many other witchcraft traditions other than Wicca to choose from that are actually open to the public. Wicca is not a synonym for all witchcraft. Wicca is not a synonym for Pagan or Neo-Pagan.
Until you bring new information to the table that actually refutes our claims and not just a bunch of whiny responses, "But I iz totally wiccanz", please stop feeding Gaians your trash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 1:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|