|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 10:13 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 10:44 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 10:53 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:06 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 4:05 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 4:46 pm
|
|
|
|
AniMajor Aino Ailill AniMajor Once, someone came into where I worked with the name Peace Everlasting. He paid with a debit card so his name came up on the screen, and he showed me his ID (even though we don't require it) in order to convince me that it was his real name. I don't think that trying to make a political/religious/ethical statement with your name is a good idea. Why?I think it's not so much as naming a person (or yourself) due to your specific beliefs, it's when you name yourself in a way so that you draw attention to yourself so that you can show how cool you think you are. It's like naming yourself Abortion-is-Murder Jones. It's like you're looking for conflict. Like those parents who named their kids after neo-Nazi concepts.
What if you are doing it not because you want to show off how 'cool' you are but because you want your name to be an accurate description of yourself and/or you want to provoke discussion?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 4:57 pm
|
|
|
|
Aino Ailill AniMajor Aino Ailill AniMajor Once, someone came into where I worked with the name Peace Everlasting. He paid with a debit card so his name came up on the screen, and he showed me his ID (even though we don't require it) in order to convince me that it was his real name. I don't think that trying to make a political/religious/ethical statement with your name is a good idea. Why?I think it's not so much as naming a person (or yourself) due to your specific beliefs, it's when you name yourself in a way so that you draw attention to yourself so that you can show how cool you think you are. It's like naming yourself Abortion-is-Murder Jones. It's like you're looking for conflict. Like those parents who named their kids after neo-Nazi concepts. What if you are doing it not because you want to show off how 'cool' you are but because you want your name to be an accurate description of yourself and/or you want to provoke discussion?
I'd hope that people are a little more complicated than a cause they subscribe to. There are also better ways to provoke discussion than making people think about an issue every time you tell someone your name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 5:17 pm
|
|
|
|
AniMajor Aino Ailill AniMajor Aino Ailill AniMajor Once, someone came into where I worked with the name Peace Everlasting. He paid with a debit card so his name came up on the screen, and he showed me his ID (even though we don't require it) in order to convince me that it was his real name. I don't think that trying to make a political/religious/ethical statement with your name is a good idea. Why?I think it's not so much as naming a person (or yourself) due to your specific beliefs, it's when you name yourself in a way so that you draw attention to yourself so that you can show how cool you think you are. It's like naming yourself Abortion-is-Murder Jones. It's like you're looking for conflict. Like those parents who named their kids after neo-Nazi concepts. What if you are doing it not because you want to show off how 'cool' you are but because you want your name to be an accurate description of yourself and/or you want to provoke discussion?I'd hope that people are a little more complicated than a cause they subscribe to. There are also better ways to provoke discussion than making people think about an issue every time you tell someone your name.
They might be more complicated, but it doesn't seem all too unreasonable for there to be some people who devote themselves to one cause.
Provoking thought about an issue every time a name is mentioned seems like an effective way to provoke discussion about it. And even if it is not the most effective method, why should that mean one ought to not do it at all?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 5:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 6:34 pm
|
|
|
|
AniMajor Aino Ailill They might be more complicated, but it doesn't seem all too unreasonable for there to be some people who devote themselves to one cause.
Provoking thought about an issue every time a name is mentioned seems like an effective way to provoke discussion about it. And even if it is not the most effective method, why should that mean one ought to not do it at all? I feel like it's telling people that it's much more important that you're involved in a cause, than what the cause is supposed to be for. I'm not saying that people shouldn't do it, it is their name after all. I'm saying that it doesn't look like they're devoted, it looks like they're trying to hard.
I don't agree with this assessment. Why would it seem like they are more devoted to being involved in a cause than to the cause itself?
Quote: While it's not fair to judge a person on their name, it just doesn't seem like a name from a cause isn't going to provoke discussion, it's either going to provoke indifference or anger. It doesn't matter how nice or personable the person is, I don't want to talk to someone named something offensive to me.
I see it as an easy conversation piece and thus likely to provoke discussion. If the person's cause is so offensive to you, and the person is devoted enough to the cause to see it as part of their identity (as they would if e named e's self with it), should you equally not want to talk to the person? In such a case, is not the warning the name provides a blessing of sorts?
...reminds me of the FML in which a person was finally brought along to the boyfriend's exclusive club...that turned out to be the KKK. I name of 'N~ Suck' or 'KKK FTW' would have made the issue moot.
Quote: I'm having a lot of trouble with the reply box, hold on.
What sort?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 7:00 pm
|
|
|
|
Aino Ailill AniMajor I feel like it's telling people that it's much more important that you're involved in a cause, than what the cause is supposed to be for. I'm not saying that people shouldn't do it, it is their name after all. I'm saying that it doesn't look like they're devoted, it looks like they're trying to hard. I don't agree with this assessment. Why would it seem like they are more devoted to being involved in a cause than to the cause itself?
Because you don't need to change your name to be devoted to a cause, and changing your name to reflect your devotion is for other people. If I changed my name to Atheist or PureAryan or IDon'tLikeGlennBeck, it doesn't change how I feel about any of those causes (not that I ascribe to all of those causes), all it does is show others that I believe in those causes.
Quote: Quote: While it's not fair to judge a person on their name, it just doesn't seem like a name from a cause isn't going to provoke discussion, it's either going to provoke indifference or anger. It doesn't matter how nice or personable the person is, I don't want to talk to someone named something offensive to me. I see it as an easy conversation piece and thus likely to provoke discussion. If the person's cause is so offensive to you, and the person is devoted enough to the cause to see it as part of their identity (as they would if e named e's self with it), should you equally not want to talk to the person? In such a case, is not the warning the name provides a blessing of sorts?
...reminds me of the FML in which a person was finally brought along to the boyfriend's exclusive club...that turned out to be the KKK. I name of 'N~ Suck' or 'KKK FTW' would have made the issue moot.
I have issues with people who base their identity around a cause anyway, regardless of the cause.
I don't understand why someone would purposefully label themselves in a way where people will not judge them fairly.
Quote: Quote: I'm having a lot of trouble with the reply box, hold on. What sort?
It wasn't letting me erase stuff, and then it wouldn't let me type. I also edited that other post like three times, and it wouldn't change it. It seems to be better now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:44 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 5:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 5:45 am
|
|
|
|
Synnthetika I don't really know anything about hypnosis, but would it be possible to induce a state of hypnosis so often and relate it to a trigger-word so that one would eventually be able to just chant, think, say the word and it induce a hypnotic state? Are there specific traditions that require the use of a "magical name"? Is it more of a personal choice? There are many things that can be used to trigger such a state. I believe there is a term floating around called "anchoring", which is using various things to trigger a reaction in the brain to cause something. It may be a psionics term, if I'm not mistaken, but I believe it can be used to apply to this, as it's the effect it's after, not so much how it can be used.
As for a name, some may, but I don't think it's necessary. Some eclectic paths may choose to do so, if so, kudo's to them. Personally, I don't have a "magical name", used in rituals in the like. However, after a while, I noted that my "deities", have called me by a rather old nickname of mine (it's been... I'd say something like 7 years now, give or take), and it wasn't even given to me by a friend, rather, an individual on Gaia who was handing out nicknames in a thread through the chatterbox. Needless to say, it stuck, and I've been using it in various thing since. The name has no incredible attachment, aside that I like the way it sounds. It's how my "deities" address me, so other than that, it's largely for entertainment use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:29 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|