|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 8:38 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 8:42 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 8:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 7:11 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 7:14 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 7:27 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 7:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 7:39 pm
|
|
|
|
I agree with Ace to an extent... I don't believe it's necessary, but I have a problem with physical things.
I tend to reject physical things as important. Like in Adoration, we have a golden ornate cross in the room in front of the Tabernacle to represent Christ, as He's present... The first temple Solomon built for God for the Ark to reside in, gorgeous. Expensive. Ornate. Gold and only the best of wood (cyprus, I think) and silver and bronze EVERYWHERE. (And built with "forced labor", but I'll not go into that.)
Catholic churches, I'm sure you've seen them... Whereas the pilgrims, at the moment the name of their branch escapes me... bare wood. Austere, the exact opposite. I tend to agree more with the latter...
I can't understand why God would be so immersed in physical materials, how He would appreciate and enjoy such earthly possessions. He made them! Why would He care so much about them?
... but I'm ranting and going entirely off-topic now. My point being, I believe more in the symbolism and spiritual meaning of it... and for that reason, entirely submersing is unnecessary. Pouring (they don't "sprinkle") holy water over and oil on the head is fine...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 7:45 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 7:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2005 9:51 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2005 10:02 am
|
|
|
|
Collun God cares not about physical things, it is the thought. Solomon spent so much on the Temple that God was pleased that he was that faithful. Baptism is not physical. It is Spiritual. Without it we are lost. It is remission of sins. Without it we have sin and are doomed. It is the same as Christ. He was submerged and was forgiven of sin (he didn't have any but he knew that it was so important that he did it even though he was perfect.) This means that we have to get baptised for we are no where near perfect. The Catholics do Lent because Jesus did it yet they skim over baptism funny huh? Lent totally off subject but i feel it needs addressing. Christ was as man on Earth. Nothing special. No super powers or laser eyes. His miracles were through God. He went 40 days with no food only water. Yes he had water. He would have died without it. The Catholics also feel the need to skim over NO FOOD for 40 days and just one type of food or not even food but an object. Sorry. That was way off topic.
Sorry, but i think you may have missed the point of baptism.... It is a public display of your faith. When you get baptized, you are pretty much saying "Hey, I'm a Christian and I'm not afraid to show it." When you invite Jesus into your heart, HE washes the sin away. Not baptism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:50 pm
|
|
|
|
Collun No. Baptism doesn't have to be public. That is like the Pharisees in the New Testament, how they prayed out loud and showed their fasting. Baptism is a link with God. Without it, God cannot wash away our sins. Even Jesus, who was perfect, was baptized. That gives it utmost importance. If you're covered with dirt, sprinkling or pouring will not cleanse you. So, since I haven't been baptized yet, I will not go to heaven if I die? That is a lie. I am sorry, but it is. Jesus plainly said. "I am THE WAY, THE TRUTH, and THE LIFE. No one comes to the Father except by Me." I am sorry, but baptizm is a public demonstration of your faith.
And baptizm isn't boasting. Baptizm is publicly showing that you aren't ashamed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:59 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|