|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:49 pm
|
|
|
|
I brought this up in a thread in M&R, so Tea suggested I bring it here.
I was wondering what happens to fluffy pagans. They come into M&R, here, or the Supernatural forum all the time, claiming to be the reincarnation of Merlin, being a half-demon/half-angel combination, or, at the very least, that OMGoddess, the world is so beautiful and all their spells work and everyone should be free to believe what they want.
And many of them leave after a few posts about "well, that's what you believe", then "stop being such a jerk", and finally "I don't care what you say, I'm still four kinds of awesome." And I obviously can't ask them what happens afterwards, so I'm asking those who stick around.
I think there was a thread about asking how people were when they were just starting out, so it's not going to be just about that, but where you are now.
The question is, then: how fluffy were you, and where are you now?
For me, I don't know if I was ever typically fluffy, and I didn't know that there were books about magic and paganism that weren't fiction. So, most of what I learned was actually out of fictional sources, like Star Wars, or the various fantasy books I read as a kid. I used to also think I was psychic, but my psychic powers mostly consisted of predicting the numbers and colors my sister was thinking of.
Now, I know more about different types of paganism, and the "Wicca" that I tried so hard to avoid isn't even the real thing. The stuff I know is a lot more reliable than it used to be, but I still feel like I'm swimming in the shallow end of the knowledge pool. And I don't really feel a drive to get better, even if I do enjoy lurking in the guild and reading the neat stuff that other people do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:38 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:32 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 8:56 am
|
|
|
|
Quote: The question is, then: how fluffy were you, and where are you now?
I don't think I was ever "I don't care what you say, I'm still four kinds of awesome.", but I did start out with a lot of my "knowledge" based on misinformation. I know I definitely didn't like being challenged on it, though it was more because I had several years of practice/study and felt (at the time) that I was knowledgeable (at least on certain things), more than it being a case of "I read this book and I now know the secrets of the universe". Every so often I run across posts that I made when I first came on Gaia, and I admit I cringe at some of them.
I think it's sad when people won't even try to listen. I've learned the hard way, that just because we don't like what we are hearing - doesn't mean that we should ignore it for our own opinions. It can be a painful process though, and not everyone is ready to face that. One of the most important things that separates "those that get it" from "those that don't", is the understanding that not all sources are created equal. Once you understand that, it makes a big difference. Most of the time once you can point someone to a reliable source text (and they actually take the time to read it), the light bulb goes off. I admit, it's not something I really thought all that much about. I think I assumed (particularly in the case of books published by Llewellyn) that this publisher specializes in these kinds of book, so they would know... wouldn't they? sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:27 am
|
|
|
|
I was a fairly standard fluffy Christian and then actually got a good understanding of the Scriptures. And then I began to develop philosophical issues with them and moved on to philosophical materialism/empiricism (which I called Atheism back then) except that I was a fluffy PM/E.
Yep, that's right, I was one of those angry, "I can disprove your silly beliefs with SCIENCE" type of capital A PM/E atheists. I was obnoxious.
Then I got some world shaking UPG and shut my obnoxious mouth while I explored that. During this time my parents were still forcing me to go to church, despite how tense things were considering that's YHVH's ground. I admit that I was supremely disrespectful and continued to test and experiment with the UPG there (including the precursors to Ether Channeling), something that probably made my broken oaths to him even more obvious and nasty. I'm still not sure how to make amends for that.
I finally put my foot down and refused to enter the church and then continued to experiment. I had moved from a fluffy atheist to a theorizing eclectic. I began looking into other religions for things that were similar to the very tiny amount of CPG I had and the rest of the UPG I was attempting to test.
I largely found that nothing in its entirety fit. Oftentimes context made even taking pieces not workable. What little bits I could pull together informed some other elements of the cosmology and metaphysics, but in the end it largely was my own CPG and UPG that I was forced to rely on when constructing the metaphysical theories of Etherism.
And now, having come from follower fluffy zones, I'm the founder of a religion, a path that treats the Self as sacred and solitary seeking of growth, power and wisdom our goal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 11:30 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 11:43 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:34 pm
|
|
|
|
Recursive Paradox I was a fairly standard fluffy Christian and then actually got a good understanding of the Scriptures. And then I began to develop philosophical issues with them and moved on to philosophical materialism/empiricism (which I called Atheism back then) except that I was a fluffy PM/E.
I never was a Christian, so all of my issues with it used to be based on misunderstandings of what it was. I still have issues with it, after reading the Bible, but at least I don't think Christianity is all about loving people forcefully, recruiting, and fearing a vengeful god that may or may not be related to the loving and recruiting.
CuAnnan Not that I told anyone other than the pagan I'm still in touch with and her reaction, combined with meeting my first Mr Darks, sorta snapped me out of it.
I never got a chance to be a Mr. Dark, because I seemed to attract Mr. Darks, and there was no way I was going to end up like them.
The worst part was that I couldn't talk to anyone or bounce discoveries off of anyone, because it would just become part of their Mr. Dark story.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 2:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:01 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:36 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:01 pm
|
|
|
|
TeaDidikai whiporwill-o i'm sorry, i don't quite understand what a 'mr. darks' is. sweatdrop It wasn't directed at you Hun. Basically a Mr. Dark is a psychological construct designed to grant autonomy by individualizing in a hyper-religious mythology English Translation: "The Boogyman is coming! I shall save the world!" Or a variation like that.
thank you, i always see people here refer to Mr. Dark. i kinda had an idea, but i wasn't positive.
and thanks again, i didn't think it was aimed at me, surely someone would've said something before now. ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|