Welcome to Gaia! ::

I never particularly thought of atheists as being a minority. For that matter, any religious creed (outside of the ones passed by lineage) being a minority.

I don't think it makes a damn though. It's not like atheists tattoo big A's on their foreheads to identify themselves. Or have common gathering places on a weekly basis by which to prey on them.

No real opinions, just meh.

As a [strong] atheist, you also make an impossible knowledge claim.
(Unless your notions, of what make up a "strong atheist," fail to meet the usually envisioned requirements.)

Talking babble does little to reduce the inability to usher in an abosolute denial, of a metaphysical entity. Without sufficient evidence, to support such a denial, lack of belief is a more logical approach.
Denying the existence, would require concrete reasoning. Moreso, than simply a philosophical blow of hot air.
Your ideals, for the concept of a god, do little to dictate the general usage of deities. Just because you think it is a primary influence on consciousness, and not of existence, hardly invalidates those who utilize it in reciprocal.

Ad hominem does little to help your point.

Evidence of such?

As is your opinion, apparently.

The same could be said for those who follow some paths of religious faith, as well. Many religions make a claim of a deity. Yet, lack the same ability to prove it, as the strong/hard atheist can provide evidence to deny.

I don't actually think that my point would accomplish anything here in the first place. Plus, emotion and personal considerations are just as important as sheer logic. Especially when logic requires a common belief in whats right and wrong etc. Thus even logic is based on perspective and is not the end all solution. Ad hominem works just fine.

Every culture, aside from hedonistic ones in their deaththroes, (like this culture, or the Greco-Romans), have belief in some greater beings. So unless humanity's culture is genetic, than how would you explain how all cultures have some sort of religion?

Which is just your opinion of my opinion. All perspective.

Yeah except we point to creation as evidence of our beliefs, we point our miracles and other sort of events. The thing is, evidence can be viewed from different perspectives and disbelieved for it. Even if someone had "concrete" evidence of the existance of dieties, someone else would claim its not proof of it. Thats why no one tries to proof it. They just believe it.
You can't prove that killing is wrong. Or right. So why do we make laws against it? Because we believe its wrong. Proof of anything isn't the point. Its the belief in something. We all believe slavery is wrong. And thus its outlawed. Can you prove slavery is wrong? Or killing? There's no concrete evidence saying its right or wrong. Proving anything is not my point. My point is -in my opinion, because this whole place is about opinions, and communicating opinions (and beliefs, even anti-beliefs), I am going to express my belief- people who deny all existance of dieties are mentally incompetent.

Yep.

Guess what the denial of a god or gods is?

Congradulations. You just proved everything in the study. Feel proud.

Seriously though, It's crap like this that people like me have to put up with every damn day.

Where the ******** do you get off thinking that I am any less of a person because I demand proof before I believe in god/ghosts/scientology/angels/etc!?

How would you feel if I said "You know! I kind if agree with the idea that Christians don't make good witnesses. Their belief in things with no real proof whatsoever must make them at least A LITTLE mentally incompetent!"

Starting to see why that pissed me off so bad?

Let me explain something to you. Atheists are just as moral as you or me (I'm agnostic myself. I happen to agree with you in that you can't prove the nonexisence of something as poorly defined as god). More so in some cases because, unlike most christians whom just show up on sundays and have never actually picked up the bible, they have actually put alot of thought into their belief rather than just taking what their parent's told them on faith. Beleive it or not you CAN come to rational conclisions on issues of morality and ethics without needing the bible/koran. You just need a good head and the right intentions. Atheists arent just people "mad at god" (and yes! I have heard them characterized like that) Many are scientists whose studies have dissproved FAR too much of biblical creed to take the idea seriosly. Others are fans of philosophy, others just free thinkers. You can't pigionhole us that easilly. We come in FAR too many varieties for you to do that.

And last time I checked it was christians/muslims/other religions that did most of the killing in the world. I've NEVER heard of an atheist killing someone because his lack of faith in god commanded him to do it.

So let me ask you and all the other christians whom seem to have their heads up their asses a few questions:

1) What study showed that Atheists where any more or less mentally sound than religious folks?

2) Why is it any less valid to believe that what isn't seen doesn't exist than to believe in something that can't be seen and may not exist?

3) What difference is there between taking an atheist off the wittness stand because you think he's incompetent and taking a jewish person off the stand because you think he's too greedy and will be bought off?

4) HOW is 3% of the population that isn't even all that vocal going to do damage in any way shape or form to a country that is doing a fine job of damaging itself as it is?

5) What would be the horrible fallout if, say, 70% of the population of the world eventually beacame Atheist? Prove your claims please.

(sorry if I sound bitter, I've put up with alot of bullcrap over this and have a short temper when it comes to this. That and it's 2:30am)