GSK Lives
Sorry, don't believe it. And I wouldn't believe it if the opposite was happening either.
You CAN post and go public in saying "Look, I understand that certain people who are pushing some truly disgusting agendas are suddenly proclaiming themselves as brothers in arms; news flash, YOU ARE NOT. You have a whole other agenda we want nothing to do with. Your goals are not ours. If you keep using our banner, we will call you out on it and condemn you at every turn as surely as we condemn the other side. We do not want you here. Push your own agenda under your own banner, leave ours alone. We are not yours to co-opt #NotYourSpear"
See, I did that pretty concisely and passionately in just a couple of minutes. You telling me noone else has that same desire or time?
And they choose not to because they're not in the interest of having ideological orthodoxy be the rule of the day. Like you said, it's a diverse movement, and the moment you start tacking on several litmus tests as to who can and can't participate in a hashtag, especially when the movement is leaderless and has no formal structure for such things, is the moment you run the risk of others alienating some based on other, more benign ideologies.
Co-option is a real issue, and when you bring in tone policing, it causes infighting. You're thinking in this in terms of a structured group with a set way of going about things. It's not. How you handle co-opting in a structured group is to throw them out. How you handle it in an un-structured group is to deny them a voice by not listening to a single word they say.
The rules are different because of the nature of the organization, or lack of organization period.
Quote:
When speaking out against them is easy, yes, silence DOES equal consent.
Good. Some can on their own time. I don't see the need for there to be a concerted effort to ostracize the guy when it would just draw attention to him, and that's what he's after. He's marginal at best within Gamergate and will likely stay that way. If they spend the entire time playing whack-a-mole with every extremist nobody that happens to use the hashtag once or twice, then that's time not spent doing anything actually productive.
Besides, the media paints Gamergate as rapist wifebeating basement dwelling dudebro misogynerd neo-Nazi hyperconsumers regardless of what they do. What's the point in trying to clean up an image that's just going to be s**t no matter what happens?