Welcome to Gaia! ::

I do agree that YEC is not a part of science. It is a Religious Worldview, just like Evolution. We are in the now, the present. Science is defined by 3 categories: It has to be observed, tested, and repeated. We can only test things that are in the present.

And as a Young Earth Creationist, (and it took me a while to know what YEC is, seriously, I thought it was a Church or a gym. XD) we both have the same evidence. We have the same grand canyon, the same stars, the same bones, the same things. I don't have any different evidence than Evolutionists. But here is the difference: We have different interpretations of the evidence.

Let's take a look at the Grand Canyon for instance. We have the same hole in the ground. Evolutionist says that it takes a little bit of water and a lot of time. Creationists says that it takes a lot of water and a little bit of time. It is the same evidence, just two entirely different interpretations.

Also, I actually watched the debate and downloaded it, and planning to go through it with a fine-tooth comb and find out which is observable, testable, and repeatable.

You're basically talking about what I believe. There is no dispute of that kind of Evolution. Matter of fact, you are talking about mutations with beneficial outcomes. I have no problem with that. We can actually observe that in the present and it is documented. That what science is. But when I talk about Evolution, I am not necessarily talking about mutations with beneficial outcomes or how there are many different species of moths to different species of moths. That is scientific because it is observed.

Here are the different levels of Evolution:

1) Cosmic Evolution: This is where the big bang happened. I have argued with people that told me this is not Evolution. But everything had a beginning, and it always starts on the Evolutionary theory. But where did the matter come from? Amazingly enough, National Pornographic Geographic says that nothing was there, but it exploded. I'm sorry, but I do not believe in that kind of Evolution.

2) Chemical Evolution. This is where all of the chemicals evolved from Hydrogen and Helium. But what about the higher elements? Some say that you can fuse by adding more energy. But really, adding more energy is destructive. We can see that on roofs, and on a car's finish. The sun's energy is fading them away. It is destructive. There is only one thing that can absorb the energy, chlorophyll that plants use. I'm sorry, but we never actually tested, observed, or repeated that.

3) Stellar and Planetary Evolution. This is where planets and stars form. There are a lot of stars out there. I mean a whole lot. Scientists estimates that there are enough of stars out there that everyone on this planet can own 11,000,000,000,000. Have fun naming them.Those are the ones we know about. We do not know the ones we do not know about. But if the universe is 20 billion years old, it would not even support of why we have so many stars. Scientists estimated that we have 70 sextillion. That is 70,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. If we divide 70 sextillion by 20 billion, that would be 3,500,000,000,000 stars forming every single year, or 6,665,000 stars forming every single minute. We do not see that many stars forming every single minute.

4) Organic Evolution. This is how life begin from non life. We never experienced life from non life, and please don't say that you have in your refrigerator. They claim that in the beginning was nothing, then it rained on the rocks, and out of the soup came alive. But it is a scientific impossibility from life coming from non life. That is not a part of science.

5) Macroevolution. That is where one kind to another kind. We have many animals in the world, but we have species and kinds. But we do not have dogs producing cats or rabbits producing horses. But they say that if you give it time, one kind can evolve into another kind. But that has not been observed, tested, or repeated. We haven't seen it happening today. Or how we came from monkeys. Now they are using the word primates now. We somehow evolved from primates as monkeys are. But that I believe is not part of science.

6) Microevolution. This is what I believe in. One species to another species. I believe that the dog, fox, and the wolf had a common ancestor. It was a dog. We see kinds producing after their own kinds. Mutations and Variations are examples of Microevolution, which is scientific and can be observed, tested, and repeated.