Welcome to Gaia! ::

The game runs flawlessly on PC and is optimized better than any other port I have played. And the gameplay is not even that bad with mouse and keyboard (would have preferred to play it on a ps3 or ps4 controller though). I liked the way new dante looked, hes pretty hot. The game itself was too easy.

getting an award is actually a very good accomplishment not to mention the voting was based on a user voting system and DmC had a substantial lead. the timeline may be in an alternate universe but its the timeline theyre going to stick with. there's already hints at a sequel in 2015. its a got thing that this series was rebooted because Dante as a character was pretty outdated and cliche. The only original version of Dante thats still likable to me is 2 because he knew to shut up and just kick everyone's a** and go home.infact people give DMC2 so much hell for being different and the easiest in the series but had it not been for dmc2 i never would have liked devil may cry in general. Capcom couldnt even keep their story in order they always placed a new game at a random point on the timeline full of plot holes.


if a game gets overwhelmingly postive reviews and awards its safe to say its a good game even if it doesnt appeal directly to every individual person.

i see your point as far as the awards go. but my point is, for a game so illy recieved before its release to be praised by gaming magazines and have such a far lead in best 360 game and sequel is pretty impressive to me. capcom said theyd prove all the hate wrong and they honestly did. the only hate it gets is "oh the characters are different", 'oh vergil used a gun', ' oh its too easy' (which is complete bullshit because i died several times every time i played on a harder difficulty) or " oh theres no lock on"


and people who say DmC's combat it simple are lying their asses off. the combat is free and creative. there werent very many combos you could chain together in the originals, now i can create some of the sickest combos my imagination can put together. point of the game is to make you feel like a bad a** and getting SSS ranks in combat because youre pulling off sick attacks is one of the best feelings about this game.


and 2, and 3 are my favorites of the originals. the other ones werent bad but the lack of checkpoints became a serious issue when i was trying to play on harder difficulties.

So pretty much no reasons why the game is actually bad, then?

So pretty much you don't know what a reason is?

I know what a reason is. You didn't give any, though.

Whether or not Bloody Palace is a DLC does not have anything to do with the actual quality of the game. If they didn't have it in completely, it would not affect the gameplay of the actual game.

As for the items being ripoffs, you give no quantification as to which items and how they're ripoffs. Your position is hurt further by the fact that it's hard to justify calling something a ripoff of something that's earlier in the same series. Furthermore, if ripping off previous items in the series is the mark of a bad game, then you should also complain about DMC4, as Gilgamesh is a clear ripoff of Beowulf, which is itself a ripoff of Ifrit, all of them being gauntlet-type weapons with attacks that can be charged up.

But hey, so which item in DMC4 was Osiris ripped off from? Or Aquila? Or how about the Arbiter? I don't recall him using a scythe, axe, or shurikens in DMC4. That's 3/4 of his special melee weapons that aren't weapon types he has in DMC4. Maybe you're confused as to what "most" means. Or are you so desperate to hate the game that you're also including things like healing items in the "ripoff items"? Or series constants, like his sword and Ebony and Ivory?

So no, you have not stated any actual reasons for it to be considered bad.