Welcome to Gaia! ::


Pablo Parades, a navy sailor, refused deployment to Iraq because it violated his anti-war beliefs. A spokesman for the Navy stated that he wasn't arrested during deployment was because he never yet violated any laws since roll call wasn't taken yet. He is now classified as a deserter and a fugitive in hiding.

Rick Rogers

Sailor opposed to Iraq war refuses to board ship
By Rick Rogers
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
December 7, 2004

Petty Officer 3rd Class Pablo Paredes followed through on his plan: He refused to board his Navy ship yesterday morning when it sailed for Iraq with thousands of Camp Pendleton Marines.

For nearly two hours, the weapons-control technician sat on his ship's pier at the 32nd Street Naval Station. He talked with media and waited to be arrested, but the arrest didn't happen.

A Navy spokesman said Paredes, 23, wasn't taken into custody because he hadn't violated any regulations. Navy procedures stipulate that an officer can't be listed as missing until an official roll has been called aboard ship.

"Paredes is considered (to be) in an unauthorized absent status," said Cmdr. William Fenick, spokesman for the 3rd Fleet. "He is encouraged to check into any naval facility as soon as possible. Sailors have an obligation to get under way when their ships deploy, and today over 5,000 sailors and Marines met that obligation and began their deployment."

Paredes believes he wasn't detained because of the media presence. On Sunday, he had called newspapers and radio and TV stations to announce his anti-deployment intentions.

Paredes had planned to publicly throw his military I.D. into the ocean to underscore his stand against the war. But yesterday, he changed his mind after learning that he could be charged with destruction of government property.

Paredes held firm, however, when a Navy officer tried to persuade him to board the amphibious assault ship Bonhomme Richard, which transports Marines to the Middle East.

"I told him that I don't plan on getting under way, that I refuse, that I resign," Paredes said yesterday afternoon in a phone interview.

Paredes had joined the Navy in 2000. He was stationed in Japan until now, he said, and didn't think he had a direct connection to the war in Iraq.

Paredes might be the first local sailor to refuse deployment on the grounds of being philosophically opposed to the Iraq war, said Sam Samuelson, spokesman for the San Diego Naval Station.

Paredes is looking for a lawyer to represent him for free before he turns himself in to the Navy.

"I knew what was coming," Paredes said, "and now I just have to see it through."


Sailor opposed to Iraq war refuses to board ship

Let me explain other conditions:

#1. Pablo Parades is an electronic technician and wouldn't have been in harms way exactly as much as the army or the marines.

#2. He is considering going back to the Navy to "face the music" on what he has done. But he doesn't want to be deployed to Iraq.

My Comments: As a future Navy enlister, I do not condone the actions of Pablo Parades. I beleive he has made a huge mistake in doing what he has done, meaning signing onto the Navy in the first place if he had ever had any anti-war beliefs.
Well say what you will about the military but that was a veyr cagey move that they pulled on him. I mean if they had played the game the way he wanted to play it there would have been footage of a man getting escorted off by MPs and that would have been a very powerful image that would have become linked to the Iraq war.
Next when exactly did these anti-war beliefs begin? Did it happen after the navy paid to train him to be a weapon specialist? Men like him disgust me. They believe that the are entitled to the very expensive training that he recieves and that he shouldn't have to pay anything back. I mean he thinks he has it rough I read about a doctor who had the marines pay for all of his medical training and he owes them 18 years of military service.
Well my view on military service is very simple, Uncle Sam asks you go. Now if you object to certain service, then register that objection and if they decide in your favor, good for you. If you don't then you either go or face the consequences of not doing it. Basically unless you object to any and all war (pacifiscm through and through) you should still serve. We all owe are country that much, even if we don't agree.
EWWW I think I know where he probably is , CANADA!!! " CANADA the Vaction spot for american deserters, hide from the american army in style "

Lady_DeVill's Husband

Dangerous Survivor

9,975 Points
  • Survivor 150
  • Brandisher 100
  • Tycoon 200
The Navel Personal should be sent to LEventhworth. What is is doing is paramont to treason. Sorry about the spelling.
Lord_Wardog
The Navel Personal should be sent to LEventhworth. What is is doing is paramont to treason. Sorry about the spelling.


From my understanding the only reason why he hasn't been taken under custody when he refused to deport was because of the media exposure at the pier dock.
TheTick900
From my understanding the only reason why he hasn't been taken under custody when he refused to deport was because of the media exposure at the pier dock.

...you did read the third paragraph of the article, right?

Doofus. If he didn't want to be deployed, he should've joined the Coast Guard.
TheTick900
Pablo Parades, a navy sailor, refused deployment to Iraq because it violated his anti-war beliefs. A spokesman for the Navy stated that he wasn't arrested during deployment was because he never yet violated any laws since roll call wasn't taken yet. He is now classified as a deserter and a fugitive in hiding.

If it violated his anti-war beliefs, then he shouldn't of joined. As far as I know you can say you disagree with the war while in the servise, but you have to obey orders.
So... he's not going to go into combat? And right now is the charge major or minor? What sort of time would he be faceing if he turns himself in?

Personally, he had a lot of time to register a protest on his deployment, and the article seems to say that he did not register a protest.
John_F_Kerry
TheTick900
From my understanding the only reason why he hasn't been taken under custody when he refused to deport was because of the media exposure at the pier dock.

...you did read the third paragraph of the article, right?

Doofus. If he didn't want to be deployed, he should've joined the Coast Guard.


This was from my understanding, not from the article that was written. And I fail to see how calling others "doofus" will help beef up an argument. However I do agree with you, if he didn't want to be deployed he shouldn't have joined.

Quick Reply

Submit
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum