Contagious Cure
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 03:12:18 +0000
C 4 r t 0 0 n M u f f i n
Contagious Cure
C 4 r t 0 0 n M u f f i n
And Contagious Cure; everyone calls a Christian posting a forum about their opinion 'shoving their beliefs down everyone's throat', so not calling this that would just be biased.
So if one person says something stupid, you have to also say something stupid to balance it out and not be biased? I don't think you understand the meaning of the word 'biased'.
If someone were to say that someone saying something forceful in defense of their beliefs was wrong, then would they not be biased if they didn't say that someone on the opposing side of the argument saying something forceful in defense of their beliefs was also wrong?
I could be way off base, but wouldn't saying that someone was wrong for forcing Christianity on say, atheists, but forcing atheism on Christians was just fine be biased?
Then again, those are two extremes..but extremes seem to be most prevalent in examples. owo
There's the issue. You've got the the definition wrong. To merely favour one side over the other is just having a preference. Being biased is specifically a partiality that prevents objective consideration of an issue or situation. Just contradicting idiocy with idiocy frankly doesn't make you unbiased.