Welcome to Gaia! :: View User's Journal | Gaia Journals

I'm still trying to make heads or tails out of this, but something new came up in which this is practically the paradoxical origin of this s**t. (******** Bible Reference)

Here's the Reddit thread: http://www.reddit.com/r/AgainstGamerGate/comments/2zxytc/on_disclosed_relationships_where_is_the_line/

This was the Wikipedia link in one of the responses: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appearance%20of%20impropriety

Wiki-Wiki:
"The appearance of impropriety is a phrase referring to a situation which to a layperson without knowledge of the specific circumstances might seem to raise ethics questions. For instance, although a person might regularly and reliably collect money for her employer in her personal wallet and later give it to her employer, her putting it in her personal wallet may appear improper and give rise to suspicion, etc. It is common business practice to avoid even the appearance of impropriety.
According to some translations, the bible in I Thessalonians 5:22 warns: “Abstain from all appearance of evil.”"

Let me attempt to decipher this: "You look guilty, so I'm going to treat you as guilty, despite anything you say, until... forever."

Let me post an example: If a Christfag was stripped of his clothes for whatever reason, and his only choice of clothing was a pink dress he found lying next to him, it would state by GG's ethics that he should be put to death when found by a Muslimfag for being a homosensual, and all statements of him being not gay would just be that of a liar trying to spare himself the death penalty.

The claim would then be that because he had the appearance of ebil, he was still ebil by extension of Retarded Bible Quote. He had no actual way to abstain from this "appearance of ebil", so he was still put to death. See, all Muslimfag saw was a guy in a pink dress. The context for his unjustified prejudice was that, because he saw you in the pink dress, you were ebil for wearing the pink dress and should be killed and/or beaten. Thus, if he was walking around nude, he is guilty by appearing ebil without past context for why he is nude. This is how GG and Christfags operate.

See, this entire loophole works like this:
Christfag: "***** should be put to death!"
*Someone Beats Up An 80 Year Old Man*
Same Christfag: "He should be imprisoned for assault and killed! This is why I need my gunz!"
Context: We don't know if the motivation was that of targeting a ***** which are most likely all over 50. Reactionaries can't decipher s**t.