|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:56 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 2:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:51 pm
|
|
|
|
immanuelkant I don't know what your Pastor was smoking Me neither, but it was clearly something very illegal.
On this subject, I must question what was meant by 'mental defect'. If it is something so small as ADD orr ADHD, then I must state that it is my opinion that the person who told you that was a complete idiot.
If, however, he was talking about something more serious, such as, say, full-blown paranoid schizophrenia, than the question becomes more complicated. The real question that needs to be asked is 'can the person accept Jesus Christ and truely mean and follow through on that acceptance?' If the answer is yes, than yes, the person in question can be saved. If no, then one must ask if that person can truely sin. To use an example (that in no way is demeaning to those with mental defects), if an infant hits a parent when upset about something, can it truely be called disrespecting the parent? The child has no recognition of what a parent is, nor even, the concept of God and His laws. so, is it still sin?
I leave you on this note because I, for one, haven't fully come up with an answer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 11:00 am
|
|
|
|
Cometh The Inquisitor immanuelkant I don't know what your Pastor was smoking Me neither, but it was clearly something very illegal. On this subject, I must question what was meant by 'mental defect'. If it is something so small as ADD orr ADHD, then I must state that it is my opinion that the person who told you that was a complete idiot. If, however, he was talking about something more serious, such as, say, full-blown paranoid schizophrenia, than the question becomes more complicated. The real question that needs to be asked is 'can the person accept Jesus Christ and truely mean and follow through on that acceptance?' If the answer is yes, than yes, the person in question can be saved. If no, then one must ask if that person can truely sin. To use an example (that in no way is demeaning to those with mental defects), if an infant hits a parent when upset about something, can it truely be called disrespecting the parent? The child has no recognition of what a parent is, nor even, the concept of God and His laws. so, is it still sin? I leave you on this note because I, for one, haven't fully come up with an answer. I don't think anyone can give a clear answer, Cometh. I don't know what to think sometimes, but here's some of my thoughts on this idea.
I know that God is a loving God, and a just God. I know that everyone has a sin nature and sins conciously without God to save them. I know that there are some conditions that prohibit a person from making those concious decisions, but I also know that a person must be saved from their sin nature as well as their concious decision.
I lean on the side of God's love more than God's justice for this one. The God that I know and follow everyday would not allow a mentally handicapped person, or a child without the ability to make a true decision, to suffer an eternal damnation just because he was just. I believe that up to a certain age (that varies for each child) they can't make the decision on their own and that if they died before that age then God doesn't judge them by their sin nature because they couldn't have believed on him truly. I believe the same for mentally handicapped people. God would not allow them to die, because what glory would be in that? How would that draw all men to himself?
I'll never really know for sure, but that's what I believe for now. God is a loving God above his own justice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 7:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 3:13 pm
|
|
|
|
Well aside from Jesus forgiving everyone for their sins.
I've been told their is a mistranslation in the word kill, it actually is suppose to be murder, which by law is very different. Also if you can drag yourself through leviticus their were people specifically meant to go out and kill those who were branded for murder, so this person was techinqually working for what would be the current law and their for Gods law, so they have to be doing the right thing and here's why....
Their is a verse (darn my inability with references, somewhere in the begining of romans, AH FOUND IT) Romans 3:5 , 6
That explains that one cannot sin and bless God, there fore those people couldn't have been doing Gods law and murdering people. So by definition (unless New Testament nullifies most Mosaic law) these people were killing the name of God............
yeah I still feel weird about that, but I do believe killing certain people is necessary, I just have no faith that humans (I myself as well) can conduct it well.
domokun ROAR lol
Also how did your pastor define a defect, I guess he is basing of the idea of a sacrifice, like the lambs, adn sppooted lambs were not accepted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 3:16 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 5:34 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 7:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 15, 2006 11:27 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 6:16 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 9:48 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:37 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 1:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|