|
|
| rate |
| 10 |
|
41% |
[ 10 ] |
| 9 |
|
12% |
[ 3 ] |
| 8 |
|
16% |
[ 4 ] |
| 7 |
|
12% |
[ 3 ] |
| 6 |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
| 5 |
|
8% |
[ 2 ] |
| 4 |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| 3 |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| 2 |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| 1 |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 9:01 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 9:08 pm
its a very cool card biggrin
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 3:11 pm
I gave it a 7 because, it may be a cool card, but it has it's weaknesses. Sure, it may have an Atk power of 3000 and can be fused to create one of the most strongest fusion monsters, but against certain cards, it will be destroyed very easily. That's my opinion on the Blue-Eyes White Dragon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 3:43 pm
i voted a 1. Just because it's a 2 tribute monster and no effect. There are better 2 tribute monsters out there like
dark magician of chaos
horus lv8
sacred phoenix of nephthys
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 12:49 am
I gave it a 7, 'cause I think it's one of the classic cards of Yugioh. It's not that very strong, except stats, but it is one of those "back from ye olde days". From when Yugioh was young. At least where I come from.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 11:31 am
I gave it a 5. Blue eyes is just a normal monster with a high attack. Theres nothing special about him unless you have alot of stuff to go with him. It takes 2 tributes to get him out, which isnt relaly worth it when there are things like Ancient Gear Golem who have the same attack, but also an additional effect. The cards that go with Blue eyes "Burst Stream" and "BEUD" are good, but it takes either 2 tributes or a card combo to get blue eyes on the feild, and all 3 blue eyes in your hand to get out the fusion. Sure its good, But it takes a long time to pull it off, unless you base your deck around either one of these strategies. Blue eyes isnt bad, but it isnt all that good either. So 5. Right in the middle 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crono Leonhart Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 12:11 pm
Give it a 7 because BEWD is now one of the easiest high attack monsters to summon. There's a whole lot of support out there for dragon types and BEWD's. 3000 atk is nothing to scoff at. Even this "late" into the game, BEWD still packs a punch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 1:02 pm
I gave it a 9. This card has almost infinite potential when used right. I had a deck which ran around BEWD and BEUD and it was possibly the best deck I ever made, I don't think I ever lost with it and the longest I went without having a Blue Eyes on the field was 3 turns from the start of the duel. There was one time when I got two on the field on my first turn and the thid on my second turn, resulting in a turn 2 win.
I used a whole plethora of ways to get it in my hand/on the field. Paladin of White Dragon with 3 Sonic Birds and 3 Manju of the Ten Thousand Hands was the most common way. I also used Lord of Dragons with the Flute, I used Kaiba Man, Different Dimension Capsule, and more. I also used cards like Painful Choice, which often resulted in my picking all three Blue Eyes, a Monster Reborn and a Magician of Faith, so I always got one either in my hand or on the field no matter what the decision of my opponent. When I did this combo I often had a Premature Burial and/or a Call of the Haunted, so I sometimes got all three on the field off that combo. That and the fact that it is an aboslute classic of a card, one of the very originals and a kick a** monster when used right. I only don't give it a 10 because nothing is ever perfect, nor full-proof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crono Leonhart Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 3:50 pm
Rapskallion I gave it a 9. This card has almost infinite potential when used right. I had a deck which ran around BEWD and BEUD and it was possibly the best deck I ever made, I don't think I ever lost with it and the longest I went without having a Blue Eyes on the field was 3 turns from the start of the duel. There was one time when I got two on the field on my first turn and the thid on my second turn, resulting in a turn 2 win.
I used a whole plethora of ways to get it in my hand/on the field. Paladin of White Dragon with 3 Sonic Birds and 3 Manju of the Ten Thousand Hands was the most common way. I also used Lord of Dragons with the Flute, I used Kaiba Man, Different Dimension Capsule, and more. I also used cards like Painful Choice, which often resulted in my picking all three Blue Eyes, a Monster Reborn and a Magician of Faith, so I always got one either in my hand or on the field no matter what the decision of my opponent. When I did this combo I often had a Premature Burial and/or a Call of the Haunted, so I sometimes got all three on the field off that combo. That and the fact that it is an aboslute classic of a card, one of the very originals and a kick a** monster when used right. I only don't give it a 10 because nothing is ever perfect, nor full-proof. But in that sense, Blue eyes would only be good if you based a deck around it. Sure, in a blue eyes or dragon based deck, its very good. But in a deck that has nothing to do with it like...warrior, it would rate very low. So you should also think about how it wouldnt fit into other things. Which is why i rated it low. Sure, its good and all, But only in a select few decks. Making its compatibility pretty low.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 6:57 am
Crono_Leonhart Rapskallion I gave it a 9. This card has almost infinite potential when used right. I had a deck which ran around BEWD and BEUD and it was possibly the best deck I ever made, I don't think I ever lost with it and the longest I went without having a Blue Eyes on the field was 3 turns from the start of the duel. There was one time when I got two on the field on my first turn and the thid on my second turn, resulting in a turn 2 win.
I used a whole plethora of ways to get it in my hand/on the field. Paladin of White Dragon with 3 Sonic Birds and 3 Manju of the Ten Thousand Hands was the most common way. I also used Lord of Dragons with the Flute, I used Kaiba Man, Different Dimension Capsule, and more. I also used cards like Painful Choice, which often resulted in my picking all three Blue Eyes, a Monster Reborn and a Magician of Faith, so I always got one either in my hand or on the field no matter what the decision of my opponent. When I did this combo I often had a Premature Burial and/or a Call of the Haunted, so I sometimes got all three on the field off that combo. That and the fact that it is an aboslute classic of a card, one of the very originals and a kick a** monster when used right. I only don't give it a 10 because nothing is ever perfect, nor full-proof. But in that sense, Blue eyes would only be good if you based a deck around it. Sure, in a blue eyes or dragon based deck, its very good. But in a deck that has nothing to do with it like...warrior, it would rate very low. So you should also think about how it wouldnt fit into other things. Which is why i rated it low. Sure, its good and all, But only in a select few decks. Making its compatibility pretty low. Plus, in a deck that is based around the Dark Paladin or Buster Blader, your Blue-Eyes White Dragon would be useless. I fought many people who had their deck based around the Blue-Eyes White Dragon and as soon as I got my Buster Blader onto the field, they were screwed and they knew it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:10 pm
That's very true and I probably should have taken that into account. Thank you for pointing that out. Although, I must say I have battled Buster Bladers and Dark Paladins both, and won. There really isn't much you can do against a Megamorphed Blue Eyes Ultimate Dragon. Especially because I kept a soul release handy to rid the dragons from my graveyard to prevent the power boost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 5:01 pm
Kotaro_Saranoska I gave it a 7 because, it may be a cool card, but it has it's weaknesses. Sure, it may have an Atk power of 3000 and can be fused to create one of the most strongest fusion monsters, but against certain cards, it will be destroyed very easily. That's my opinion on the Blue-Eyes White Dragon. same with most other cards. i gave it a 10 because it's my fav, it's good, can form BEU and shining dragon (which i've done repeatedly) and can form some sweet combos. it's the best! 4laugh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 5:10 pm
Kotaro_Saranoska Crono_Leonhart Rapskallion I gave it a 9. This card has almost infinite potential when used right. I had a deck which ran around BEWD and BEUD and it was possibly the best deck I ever made, I don't think I ever lost with it and the longest I went without having a Blue Eyes on the field was 3 turns from the start of the duel. There was one time when I got two on the field on my first turn and the thid on my second turn, resulting in a turn 2 win.
I used a whole plethora of ways to get it in my hand/on the field. Paladin of White Dragon with 3 Sonic Birds and 3 Manju of the Ten Thousand Hands was the most common way. I also used Lord of Dragons with the Flute, I used Kaiba Man, Different Dimension Capsule, and more. I also used cards like Painful Choice, which often resulted in my picking all three Blue Eyes, a Monster Reborn and a Magician of Faith, so I always got one either in my hand or on the field no matter what the decision of my opponent. When I did this combo I often had a Premature Burial and/or a Call of the Haunted, so I sometimes got all three on the field off that combo. That and the fact that it is an aboslute classic of a card, one of the very originals and a kick a** monster when used right. I only don't give it a 10 because nothing is ever perfect, nor full-proof. But in that sense, Blue eyes would only be good if you based a deck around it. Sure, in a blue eyes or dragon based deck, its very good. But in a deck that has nothing to do with it like...warrior, it would rate very low. So you should also think about how it wouldnt fit into other things. Which is why i rated it low. Sure, its good and all, But only in a select few decks. Making its compatibility pretty low. Plus, in a deck that is based around the Dark Paladin or Buster Blader, your Blue-Eyes White Dragon would be useless. I fought many people who had their deck based around the Blue-Eyes White Dragon and as soon as I got my Buster Blader onto the field, they were screwed and they knew it. not if you get shining dragon out, it gets 300 point boost for each dragon in your graveyard, and has more attack to start with then buster blader
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:47 am
Rapskallion That's very true and I probably should have taken that into account. Thank you for pointing that out. Although, I must say I have battled Buster Bladers and Dark Paladins both, and won. There really isn't much you can do against a Megamorphed Blue Eyes Ultimate Dragon. Especially because I kept a soul release handy to rid the dragons from my graveyard to prevent the power boost. In my Dark Paladin/Buster Blader deck, I had all my dragons in it (including a Blue-Eyes).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 9:26 pm
cant remeber what i gave it but i think its a ok card in my deck doesnt base itslef on it either cause my deck doesnt have a base my first hand decides my stradiegy that ill use for the rest of the duel because if i used that same stradegy people would beat me easily but if i dont really have one stradegy people cant beat me as easy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
