|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:46 pm
Let me know if this has been done before. Will Brad Childress ruin the Vikings by signing that fish known as Brett Favre? (I apologize for my bias-ness)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:31 pm
It's not a bad move neccessarily. Especially if they move down to Los Angeles with all the media attention down there. After all, 80% of Brett Favre is better than 100% of Rosenfels and T. Jackson. Just use Brett as an opener and then one of those two as a closer. I still think you've got to be one of the biggest jackasses in the world to be even used in the same conversation as "Favre Watch."
The only thing they could've done better than Favre is go after Cutler more intensely or at least pick-up Leftwhich or save Leinart, hell, Jon Kitna for cryin' out loud, maybe even give Thigpen a shot. As soon as the offseason started, they should've made a move. The only reason that they're going after Favre is because they didn't.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 10:22 pm
tru... not a bad move
but T Jack needs a chance to prove himself... dis season could B he his final chance... I like his mobility (no homo)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 10:27 pm
please if any MOD sees this please make a sticky thread that says no more farve threads
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|