|
|
| Best key Panthers player? |
| QB Jake Delhomme |
|
12% |
[ 1 ] |
| RB DeShaun Foster |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| WR Steve Smith |
|
50% |
[ 4 ] |
| RB DeAngelo Williams |
|
37% |
[ 3 ] |
| K John Kasay |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| LE Julius Peppers |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| WR Muhsin Muhammad |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| MLB Dan Morgan |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| CB Chris Gamble |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| DT Maake Kemoeatu |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:10 pm
Dude-LAP Argus Plexus Dude-LAP Argus Plexus Dude-LAP Argus Plexus I wish Carolina could get him on their side somehow, and get a smarter quarterback. It's not fantasy football. They can't just grab the best wide receiver in the league. Anyways, Fitzgerald has already signed a long term deal with the Cardinals. I wish Carolina could get him on their side somehow, and get a smarter quarterback. I'm not a ******** dumbass, I know they can't just drag and drop like on a computer. Calm down. I thought you didn't know. Because if you did know, you wouldn't say "could get him on their side somehow," if you knew that Fitzgerald signed a 4 year, $4 million contract last season. stare He's still a beast, and a jewel of a receiver. He's right up there with Steve Smith. Above Steve Smith. Right now I have Larry Fitzgerald, Randy Moss, Terrell Owens, and Andre Johnson. Steve Smith is up there with Calvin Johnson, Plaxico Burress, Roddy White, Anquan Boldin, Brandon Marshall, and Reggie Wayne, in the tier right below the elites. You're talking stats again, my friend. One thing that you need to take from this season is that stats mean absolutely nothing. If stats decided the game, the Cards would have gotten raped by Carolina.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 1:55 pm
Argus Plexus Dude-LAP Argus Plexus Dude-LAP Argus Plexus I wish Carolina could get him on their side somehow, and get a smarter quarterback. I'm not a ******** dumbass, I know they can't just drag and drop like on a computer. Calm down. I thought you didn't know. Because if you did know, you wouldn't say "could get him on their side somehow," if you knew that Fitzgerald signed a 4 year, $4 million contract last season. stare He's still a beast, and a jewel of a receiver. He's right up there with Steve Smith. Above Steve Smith. Right now I have Larry Fitzgerald, Randy Moss, Terrell Owens, and Andre Johnson. Steve Smith is up there with Calvin Johnson, Plaxico Burress, Roddy White, Anquan Boldin, Brandon Marshall, and Reggie Wayne, in the tier right below the elites. You're talking stats again, my friend. One thing that you need to take from this season is that stats mean absolutely nothing. If stats decided the game, the Cards would have gotten raped by Carolina. LOL, are you kidding me? First of all, the Cardinals beat the Panthers statistically, physically, and mentally. Get over it. Second of all, why the hell would I use stats to rate the best receivers? If you were playing in the Super Bowl, and needed a player to make a huge impact? That's my basis. And right now, I'd have any of the four I rated above Steve Smith to do so. He's a great receiver, but not the best, or among the other ahead of him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:03 pm
Dude-LAP Argus Plexus Dude-LAP Argus Plexus Dude-LAP Argus Plexus I wish Carolina could get him on their side somehow, and get a smarter quarterback. I'm not a ******** dumbass, I know they can't just drag and drop like on a computer. Calm down. I thought you didn't know. Because if you did know, you wouldn't say "could get him on their side somehow," if you knew that Fitzgerald signed a 4 year, $4 million contract last season. stare He's still a beast, and a jewel of a receiver. He's right up there with Steve Smith. Above Steve Smith. Right now I have Larry Fitzgerald, Randy Moss, Terrell Owens, and Andre Johnson. Steve Smith is up there with Calvin Johnson, Plaxico Burress, Roddy White, Anquan Boldin, Brandon Marshall, and Reggie Wayne, in the tier right below the elites. You're talking stats again, my friend. One thing that you need to take from this season is that stats mean absolutely nothing. If stats decided the game, the Cards would have gotten raped by Carolina. LOL, are you kidding me? First of all, the Cardinals beat the Panthers statistically, physically, and mentally. Get over it. Second of all, why the hell would I use stats to rate the best receivers? If you were playing in the Super Bowl, and needed a player to make a huge impact? That's my basis. And right now, I'd have any of the four I rated above Steve Smith to do so. He's a great receiver, but not the best, or among the other ahead of him. First of all, I don't care what you have to say about that game. I'm just using it as an example. In fact, I'd rather forget about it. Second of all, yes, he is one of the best. That's all I wanted. I wanted you to stop just dissing him and acting like he is some trash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:38 pm
Argus Plexus Dude-LAP Argus Plexus Dude-LAP Argus Plexus He's still a beast, and a jewel of a receiver. He's right up there with Steve Smith. Above Steve Smith. Right now I have Larry Fitzgerald, Randy Moss, Terrell Owens, and Andre Johnson. Steve Smith is up there with Calvin Johnson, Plaxico Burress, Roddy White, Anquan Boldin, Brandon Marshall, and Reggie Wayne, in the tier right below the elites. You're talking stats again, my friend. One thing that you need to take from this season is that stats mean absolutely nothing. If stats decided the game, the Cards would have gotten raped by Carolina. LOL, are you kidding me? First of all, the Cardinals beat the Panthers statistically, physically, and mentally. Get over it. Second of all, why the hell would I use stats to rate the best receivers? If you were playing in the Super Bowl, and needed a player to make a huge impact? That's my basis. And right now, I'd have any of the four I rated above Steve Smith to do so. He's a great receiver, but not the best, or among the other ahead of him. First of all, I don't care what you have to say about that game. I'm just using it as an example. In fact, I'd rather forget about it. Second of all, yes, he is one of the best. That's all I wanted. I wanted you to stop just dissing him and acting like he is some trash. You obviously didn't read what I wrote, or like to put words into my mouth. I said that Steve Smith was a great receiver. Then you acknowledged that when you answered back. And then in the next sentence, you said that I dissed him and treated him like trash. Short term memory loss?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 7:02 pm
Dude-LAP Argus Plexus Dude-LAP Argus Plexus Dude-LAP Argus Plexus He's still a beast, and a jewel of a receiver. He's right up there with Steve Smith. Above Steve Smith. Right now I have Larry Fitzgerald, Randy Moss, Terrell Owens, and Andre Johnson. Steve Smith is up there with Calvin Johnson, Plaxico Burress, Roddy White, Anquan Boldin, Brandon Marshall, and Reggie Wayne, in the tier right below the elites. You're talking stats again, my friend. One thing that you need to take from this season is that stats mean absolutely nothing. If stats decided the game, the Cards would have gotten raped by Carolina. LOL, are you kidding me? First of all, the Cardinals beat the Panthers statistically, physically, and mentally. Get over it. Second of all, why the hell would I use stats to rate the best receivers? If you were playing in the Super Bowl, and needed a player to make a huge impact? That's my basis. And right now, I'd have any of the four I rated above Steve Smith to do so. He's a great receiver, but not the best, or among the other ahead of him. First of all, I don't care what you have to say about that game. I'm just using it as an example. In fact, I'd rather forget about it. Second of all, yes, he is one of the best. That's all I wanted. I wanted you to stop just dissing him and acting like he is some trash. You obviously didn't read what I wrote, or like to put words into my mouth. I said that Steve Smith was a great receiver. Then you acknowledged that when you answered back. And then in the next sentence, you said that I dissed him and treated him like trash. Short term memory loss? Everyone always says how the Cats suck and forget how young the team is. They do ridiculously good for how young the team is in comparison to the Steels, G-men and such. Those are all old, established names.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 8:46 pm
Argus Plexus Dude-LAP Argus Plexus Dude-LAP Argus Plexus You're talking stats again, my friend. One thing that you need to take from this season is that stats mean absolutely nothing. If stats decided the game, the Cards would have gotten raped by Carolina. LOL, are you kidding me? First of all, the Cardinals beat the Panthers statistically, physically, and mentally. Get over it. Second of all, why the hell would I use stats to rate the best receivers? If you were playing in the Super Bowl, and needed a player to make a huge impact? That's my basis. And right now, I'd have any of the four I rated above Steve Smith to do so. He's a great receiver, but not the best, or among the other ahead of him. First of all, I don't care what you have to say about that game. I'm just using it as an example. In fact, I'd rather forget about it. Second of all, yes, he is one of the best. That's all I wanted. I wanted you to stop just dissing him and acting like he is some trash. You obviously didn't read what I wrote, or like to put words into my mouth. I said that Steve Smith was a great receiver. Then you acknowledged that when you answered back. And then in the next sentence, you said that I dissed him and treated him like trash. Short term memory loss? Everyone always says how the Cats suck and forget how young the team is. They do ridiculously good for how young the team is in comparison to the Steels, G-men and such. Those are all old, established names. But your avoiding the point you made...Name one time where I "trashed and dissed" Steve Smith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:02 pm
Dude-LAP Argus Plexus Dude-LAP Argus Plexus Dude-LAP Argus Plexus You're talking stats again, my friend. One thing that you need to take from this season is that stats mean absolutely nothing. If stats decided the game, the Cards would have gotten raped by Carolina. LOL, are you kidding me? First of all, the Cardinals beat the Panthers statistically, physically, and mentally. Get over it. Second of all, why the hell would I use stats to rate the best receivers? If you were playing in the Super Bowl, and needed a player to make a huge impact? That's my basis. And right now, I'd have any of the four I rated above Steve Smith to do so. He's a great receiver, but not the best, or among the other ahead of him. First of all, I don't care what you have to say about that game. I'm just using it as an example. In fact, I'd rather forget about it. Second of all, yes, he is one of the best. That's all I wanted. I wanted you to stop just dissing him and acting like he is some trash. You obviously didn't read what I wrote, or like to put words into my mouth. I said that Steve Smith was a great receiver. Then you acknowledged that when you answered back. And then in the next sentence, you said that I dissed him and treated him like trash. Short term memory loss? Everyone always says how the Cats suck and forget how young the team is. They do ridiculously good for how young the team is in comparison to the Steels, G-men and such. Those are all old, established names. But your avoiding the point you made...Name one time where I "trashed and dissed" Steve Smith. You got me there. You didn't do that, but I just felt like you were doing your best to s**t on him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:51 pm
Argus Plexus Dude-LAP Argus Plexus Dude-LAP Argus Plexus First of all, I don't care what you have to say about that game. I'm just using it as an example. In fact, I'd rather forget about it. Second of all, yes, he is one of the best. That's all I wanted. I wanted you to stop just dissing him and acting like he is some trash. You obviously didn't read what I wrote, or like to put words into my mouth. I said that Steve Smith was a great receiver. Then you acknowledged that when you answered back. And then in the next sentence, you said that I dissed him and treated him like trash. Short term memory loss? Everyone always says how the Cats suck and forget how young the team is. They do ridiculously good for how young the team is in comparison to the Steels, G-men and such. Those are all old, established names. But your avoiding the point you made...Name one time where I "trashed and dissed" Steve Smith. You got me there. You didn't do that, but I just felt like you were doing your best to s**t on him. See what I mean? You're schizophrenic in your posts. The first sentence you said there was that I didn't do anything to diss Steve Smith. And then in the next sentence, you say that I was "doing my best to s**t on him." sweatdrop I think I might just lock this thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:20 pm
LOL rofl you guys have the funniest argue ments cause argus says all this crap then u shut him down with FACTS!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 9:16 am
Do it. The last thing I want to do is dignify Austin with a reply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 11:02 am
confused
whatever... Locked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
