|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:54 am
Top 15 Reasons Brady won't be there
1) The NYG's D line will be there and playing
2) Without Randy he is mediocre
3) The Mannings are in his 'head'
4) Giselle wants 'OUT'
5) Can't win the big one(s) in the hot sandy 'elements' in February
6) Is too 'soft' and too 'finesse' to play in the Pro Bowl
7) Said he needs his neck checked as he is having choking problems
cool Having problem with monkeys on his back
9) Garage sale for 19-0 items
10) Cameras are not allowed at the Pro Bowl
11) 18-1 is better than 18-2 and the regular season wins are 'what matters'.
12) Piped in noise is allowed at Pro Bowl
13) The NFC stole his play signals
14) Great regular season guy but fades in the Pro Bowl games
15) Noticed many *'s on the Pro Bowl rules guide
These are ment as jokes, some what.
xd
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:53 pm
xd nice ones.
...But I'm surprised that some of the Giants were not included in the Pro-Bowl this year. I mean...the NFL Champs are only sending Umenyora to represent...
I agree about Manning not being in, because he didn't have such a smooth regular season. But Jacobs, Burress, some O-Line guys, Pierce, Tuck, and Strahan should have been considered in the discussion. confused
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:51 pm
Dude-LAP xd nice ones. ...But I'm surprised that some of the Giants were not included in the Pro-Bowl this year. I mean...the NFL Champs are only sending Umenyora to represent... I agree about Manning not being in, because he didn't have such a smooth regular season. But Jacobs, Burress, some O-Line guys, Pierce, Tuck, and Strahan should have been considered in the discussion. confused lol, oh yea. You like my sig? rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 4:41 pm
IndianapolisColtsFan Dude-LAP xd nice ones. ...But I'm surprised that some of the Giants were not included in the Pro-Bowl this year. I mean...the NFL Champs are only sending Umenyora to represent... I agree about Manning not being in, because he didn't have such a smooth regular season. But Jacobs, Burress, some O-Line guys, Pierce, Tuck, and Strahan should have been considered in the discussion. confused lol, oh yea. You like my sig? rofl yes, very creative. smile ...though Brady has more Super Bowl rings than the Mannings combined... crying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 3:10 am
Dude-LAP IndianapolisColtsFan Dude-LAP xd nice ones. ...But I'm surprised that some of the Giants were not included in the Pro-Bowl this year. I mean...the NFL Champs are only sending Umenyora to represent... I agree about Manning not being in, because he didn't have such a smooth regular season. But Jacobs, Burress, some O-Line guys, Pierce, Tuck, and Strahan should have been considered in the discussion. confused lol, oh yea. You like my sig? rofl yes, very creative. smile ...though Brady has more Super Bowl rings than the Mannings combined... crying It's fine, although i see Eli getting better than Peyton and Tom in the future, i don't know why...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:52 pm
IndianapolisColtsFan Dude-LAP IndianapolisColtsFan Dude-LAP xd nice ones. ...But I'm surprised that some of the Giants were not included in the Pro-Bowl this year. I mean...the NFL Champs are only sending Umenyora to represent... I agree about Manning not being in, because he didn't have such a smooth regular season. But Jacobs, Burress, some O-Line guys, Pierce, Tuck, and Strahan should have been considered in the discussion. confused lol, oh yea. You like my sig? rofl yes, very creative. smile ...though Brady has more Super Bowl rings than the Mannings combined... crying It's fine, although i see Eli getting better than Peyton and Tom in the future, i don't know why... Oh, really? Yea, he has mentally gotten there, which surprises me. Playing in New York, he is always being examined and looked at. He knows how to deal with the negatives well, along with praise. He's playing with confidence and heart as a leader. I'm very impressed. Yet I still don't think that he's at the physical ability of Tom or Peyton.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 5:29 pm
Dude-LAP IndianapolisColtsFan Dude-LAP IndianapolisColtsFan Dude-LAP xd nice ones. ...But I'm surprised that some of the Giants were not included in the Pro-Bowl this year. I mean...the NFL Champs are only sending Umenyora to represent... I agree about Manning not being in, because he didn't have such a smooth regular season. But Jacobs, Burress, some O-Line guys, Pierce, Tuck, and Strahan should have been considered in the discussion. confused lol, oh yea. You like my sig? rofl yes, very creative. smile ...though Brady has more Super Bowl rings than the Mannings combined... crying It's fine, although i see Eli getting better than Peyton and Tom in the future, i don't know why... Oh, really? Yea, he has mentally gotten there, which surprises me. Playing in New York, he is always being examined and looked at. He knows how to deal with the negatives well, along with praise. He's playing with confidence and heart as a leader. I'm very impressed. Yet I still don't think that he's at the physical ability of Tom or Peyton. I wouldnt think so.. But i dont know why... I hope not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 9:35 pm
A good reason there is only one Giant in the pro-bowl is the fact that the Giants' success was a team effort, no one was really a "superstar" all season. Note that I'm talking about the regular season, where Eli was not phenominal. Also, slow down, Kid Colt. Eli may have won a Superbowl already, but he doesn't have the mechanics that Peyton or Tom has...
...yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 2:52 am
Jcsb1993 A good reason there is only one Giant in the pro-bowl is the fact that the Giants' success was a team effort, no one was really a "superstar" all season. Note that I'm talking about the regular season, where Eli was not phenominal. Also, slow down, Kid Colt. Eli may have won a Superbowl already, but he doesn't have the mechanics that Peyton or Tom has... ...yet. And that's why I am saying in the FUTURE... wink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 1:22 pm
Jcsb1993 A good reason there is only one Giant in the pro-bowl is the fact that the Giants' success was a team effort, no one was really a "superstar" all season. Note that I'm talking about the regular season, where Eli was not phenominal. Also, slow down, Kid Colt. Eli may have won a Superbowl already, but he doesn't have the mechanics that Peyton or Tom has... ...yet. Players from the Giants that clearly deserved to be in the Pro-Bowl: Umenyora Strahan Tuck Pierce Snee Burress Jacobs ( maybe)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 6:54 pm
Dude-LAP Jcsb1993 A good reason there is only one Giant in the pro-bowl is the fact that the Giants' success was a team effort, no one was really a "superstar" all season. Note that I'm talking about the regular season, where Eli was not phenominal. Also, slow down, Kid Colt. Eli may have won a Superbowl already, but he doesn't have the mechanics that Peyton or Tom has... ...yet. Players from the Giants that clearly deserved to be in the Pro-Bowl: Umenyora Strahan Tuck Pierce Snee Burress Jacobs ( maybe) Idk, Bradshaw put up some good numbers.. wink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:52 pm
IndianapolisColtsFan Dude-LAP Jcsb1993 A good reason there is only one Giant in the pro-bowl is the fact that the Giants' success was a team effort, no one was really a "superstar" all season. Note that I'm talking about the regular season, where Eli was not phenominal. Also, slow down, Kid Colt. Eli may have won a Superbowl already, but he doesn't have the mechanics that Peyton or Tom has... ...yet. Players from the Giants that clearly deserved to be in the Pro-Bowl: Umenyora Strahan Tuck Pierce Snee Burress Jacobs ( maybe) Idk, Bradshaw put up some good numbers.. wink He had 2 or 3 great performances, but that isn't really enough. He is a rookie with a very bright future. But the sad thing is that Bradshaw is the 3rd string running back, and the well known Droughns is 4th, or goal-line. ...As it looks to be now, it's Jacobs > Ward > Bradshaw > Droughns. The Giants probably have the deepest run-game in the NFL. Thank the fairly new GM Reese smile ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
