Welcome to Gaia! ::

Politicians of Gaia

Back to Guilds

A place for debates of political/social values and ideas 

Tags: Politics, debate, Conservtive, Liberal, Moderate 

Reply Debate Forum
Maybe a bit of a sensitive topic...Gun RIghts Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

thenerdqueen

PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 10:44 pm


I do not eat animals, therefore, I do not consider them food. All animals should have rights, not just humans. For one thing, some animal species have proven themselves to be just as sentinent as humans.
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 10:51 pm


that's sentient, and, no, they shouldn't.

To prove my point, would you want to be locked up in a tank with nothing but cedar shavings to sleep in, and nutrient pellets as a food source?

They do not actively contribute to any aspect of society, they simply live according to their nature and training. They have no say in what happens to them, so granting them "rights" would be a moot point.

dronze


thenerdqueen

PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:45 pm


Sorry, I don't use a spellchecker on Gaia; thanks for the correction.

I have become conditioned to freedom; I would hate it. However, if I had always lived in the cage, how would I know that there is something better? Indeed, I would feel that the cage is my house, and that I was safe there.

Do you understand any of what a bird says? How about the language of a dog? If not, how about a cat's, hampster's or a horse 's speech? Consider: All of these animals comprehend some part of human's speech.

Do you or I contribute to society? All I do is wake up very late, eat, go on the Internet for a couple of hours, and run during cross-country practice. That's it. I have no say in what the government orders me to do. I can't vote, or run for an office. Are my rights moot?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:59 pm


We've killed our way to the top of the food chain, and it wasn't to eat carrots...As Ron White said.


thenerdqueen
Protecting themselves would be learning what a bulletproof vest is, and where to buy one, or learning to dodge bullets by running in a zigzag and such useful things as that. Learning where to shoot people is learning how to kill them.
And the semester was a reference to the cost to get in to college. A year in a public college costs about 4,500- 5,000 dollars.
That dollar amount could also constitute the price of a knife-rated vest. A good bulet-prof vest can range for 6-10 thousand dollars. THe best, Dragon Skin, is marked "security/military only" and is well above that price mark. But, it can take immense damage and only leave oyu with some bruises. That includes one case of a grenade, though that woudl leave some scratches and more trauma. (See: Sutureweapons ran an episode featuring Dragon Skin, in which he promptly emptied a magazine form an M16, AK-47, and MP5 *9mm submachinegun* into it, without a single round going thorugh. THey then used the same vest, on a dummy, over a greane with the dummy still surviving) And the zig-zag, or "serpentine", run won;t keep you form being shot. IT simply draws your attention away from the shooter. AND learning how to dodge a bullet isn't "useful". It's a waste of time and money, which would be better invested into firearms training. And simply isn't possible, as a .22 (The smallest) goes 1200 feet per second, which means you have no chance to dodge.

AS or my source on prices for vests: I routeinly get Military and Law Enforcement catalogs and offers in my mailbox-both by choice and randomly. And the only place I've seen Dragon Skin is on TV and a Security Supply website.

thenerdqueen
They are supposed to be safeguards against an oppressive government. (Which I suppose, would technically make the gun-holding citizens terrorists for preparing for a coup of the government...)
That has been said of the Founding Fathers. They not onyl planned on a coup against the government, the used guerilla warfare. They placed the 2nd there so that America wouldn't have to suffer like they did when they were under British rule.

uryu ishida


uryu ishida

PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:05 am


thenerdqueen
Sorry, I don't use a spellchecker on Gaia; thanks for the correction.

I have become conditioned to freedom; I would hate it. However, if I had always lived in the cage, how would I know that there is something better? Indeed, I would feel that the cage is my house, and that I was safe there.

Do you understand any of what a bird says? How about the language of a dog? If not, how about a cat's, hampster's or a horse 's speech? Consider: All of these animals comprehend some part of human's speech.

Do you or I contribute to society? All I do is wake up very late, eat, go on the Internet for a couple of hours, and run during cross-country practice. That's it. I have no say in what the government orders me to do. I can't vote, or run for an office. Are my rights moot?
I;m going to throw in my opinion on the side of your guys' argument.

Humans are the dominant species of Earth, adn have for societies, speech, science, religion, and everything you take for granted. Okay, that sentence was useless, I'll start again.

Humans, in the scientific view, are only highly-evolved animals. ANd, tohugh all of time, animals have eaten other, usually weaker, animals. Humans have kept the "tradition" of nature, not ot mention your health will go to he11 without some of the components found in various meat. The biggest being protien.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:08 am


1) Why not? Carrots taste better than meat, and they are better for you.

2) I curtsy to your superior knowledge of bulletproof vests. I have no idea what they cost. However, these are just my (obviously not very good) examples on what could be taught in a true protection class.

3) Exactly my point. One person's patriot is another person's terrorist.

thenerdqueen


uryu ishida

PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:58 am


Nothing beats meat! I can't live without meat. Meat is good.

.....We hit on the strangest, most unrelated topics while we're here, don;t we?
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:09 am


Quote:
1) Why not? Carrots taste better than meat, and they are better for you.

Because humans are Omnivores, and we're meant to do so. look at the structure of your teeth, they're designed to tear and cut flesh as well as crush and grind vegetation.

Quote:
2) I curtsy to your superior knowledge of bulletproof vests. I have no idea what they cost. However, these are just my (obviously not very good) examples on what could be taught in a true protection class.

I have taken and helped to teach self defense classes, and, generally, when you're out in public, and someone pulls a gun on you, your best bet is to submit to their demands. I, personally, am not a fan of feeling helpless, and, as the saying goes, an armed society is a polie society. you are less likely to be mugged in an area that has a dense population of consealed carry permits, for the simple fact that criminals are never sure if someone is carrying a piece that could forcibly remove a limb with a well-placed shot or series of shots.

It's a grim mental image, but it's effective, and it's a reality. Bullets do more than make holes in people, there's a fairly large amount of energy transferred in those little hunks of lead (or tungsten, if someone has the money for "green" rounds), and most handguns can, and on a well-placed center-mass shot, will, shatter bones and cause severe organ damage.

That aside, have you ever tried to WEAR body armor? it's generally fairly heavy, exceptionally warm, and, well, generally uncomforable. besides, what good is it if you get shot in the head?

Quote:
3) Exactly my point. One person's patriot is another person's terrorist.

I'm not going to dispute this, there's no reason to. All I can say to this point is that I agree completely.

dronze


uryu ishida

PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:44 am


And any armor that lets you move and is concealable are generally ineffective.

So, you have helped teach self defense classes? Which type (unarmed, armed, basics, ect)?
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:48 am


unarmed and basics. generally, the rule of thumb was trying to arm yourself is a bad idea unless you know what you're doing, because if you're armed, and you get disarmed, your opposition can suddenly have a tool at their disposal they didnn't have, and a lot of motivation to use it.

dronze


uryu ishida

PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:58 am


That's the point of taking a class, now isn't it?

Tell me, would you try to take away someone's gun while looking down a half-inch wide barrel? (that is .45 ACP, .431". Nearly half!) It's even better if it's a double-action automatic, so they don;t have to pull the trigger back before firing.

Such as, before you can get a carry permit in Tennessee, you have to take a state-licensed, and it also has ot have another license for the permit course, atleast 8-hour course. My personal frind, wo is an instructor, maximizes time to around 10-12 total hours.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:15 am


allow me to clarify with the "armed" statement... I was referring more to carrying a knife, riot baton, or some sort of inprovisational weapon, like a glass bottle, or piece of lumber.

although, if I were an attacker, I would definately have reservations about my actions when faced with anything chambered in .45 ACP (or even .357 magnum/.38 special, for that matter). But, to be honest, I'd like to see Glacer (sp?) safety slugs made available for personal defense... those leave truly horrific results, and will not over-penetrate the target for anything.

dronze


uryu ishida

PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:40 pm


Frangible rounds? They won;t shatter like that unless they hit sometihng hard, like steel. Now, sometihng that won;t over-penetrate, and yet devastete the intended target would be the Thunder 5. It's a double-action revolver, .45. The secret is that it can also shoot .410 shotshells.

I do carry a knife, and it's legal nonetheless. I don;t really plan on using it in an attack situation, but I do have to open a lot of boxes, cut strings, and do other various things.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:05 pm


Safety slugs are meant for use by air marshals. It's essentially shot pellets suspended in a Teflon gel. they're made to bring down hostile passengers without running the risk of putting a hole in the cabin.

dronze


uryu ishida

PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:15 pm


Well, I can understand the cabin. IF oyu said fuselage I would have disagreed. You can't make a plane depressurize with a bullet hole in the side.
Reply
Debate Forum

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum