|
|
| Yo ho ho and a bottle o' rum. |
| Aren't you mixing themes a bit here? |
|
38% |
[ 18 ] |
| Fifteen men on a dead man's chest. Savvy? Walk the plank, ya scurvy sea-dog. Eat cold steal, pigdogs. Oh, wait, that's barbarian talk isn't it. Oh well. |
|
61% |
[ 29 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2005 7:56 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2005 8:00 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:57 pm
sweatdrop Like, what are we talking about?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 3:26 pm
Like, I don't know. eek Far out, man.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:54 am
I think I look very Ace Rimmer in this jacket. stressed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 12:12 pm
Minxyzoo I think I look very Ace Rimmer in this jacket. stressed Ace wears pants. blaugh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 12:26 pm
Question for rimmer: What's W.O.O ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2005 4:20 pm
Blue Elec Question for rimmer: What's W.O.O ? "W.O.O. That does, of course, stand for... Wombats Out for Olives. Yes. It's an organization of... wombats that... like olives." sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:00 am
Keldan Blue Elec Question for rimmer: What's W.O.O ? "W.O.O. That does, of course, stand for... Wombats Out for Olives. Yes. It's an organization of... wombats that... like olives." sweatdrop are you sure it doesn't mean With Out Oxygen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:38 pm
Okay, Season 1, "Future Echoes"...
How exactly does a future echo work?
Seeing as you're travelling faster than Light Speed, you see objects AFTER you've passed through them. Thus, wouldn't you see all actions after they happened, and so see the PAST instead of the FUTURE?
This one has been bugging me for a while.
Also... The dust storm in Season 1 "Confidence and Paranoia"... moving through a dust storm in space, seeing as there is nothing to cause friction, would mean the dust would not refract off of the hull, but instead pierce straight through it, making space travel relatively impossible. How does Red Dwarf's hull survive such constant bombardment from fast moving particles?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 7:28 pm
Blue Elec are you sure it doesn't mean With Out Oxygen "Do not deny the will of Rimmer, whose name does not rhyme with 'scum!'"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 7:34 pm
Cagalli Yura Attha Okay, Season 1, "Future Echoes"... How exactly does a future echo work? Seeing as you're travelling faster than Light Speed, you see objects AFTER you've passed through them. Thus, wouldn't you see all actions after they happened, and so see the PAST instead of the FUTURE? This one has been bugging me for a while. Also... The dust storm in Season 1 "Confidence and Paranoia"... moving through a dust storm in space, seeing as there is nothing to cause friction, would mean the dust would not refract off of the hull, but instead pierce straight through it, making space travel relatively impossible. How does Red Dwarf's hull survive such constant bombardment from fast moving particles? "Good questions, good questions. Unfortunately I have no smegging idea. All I can say is that the writers of my magnificent self and that pig Lister must have been confused at the time of writing Future Echoes. You see, apparently they think that moving faster than light speed implies moving fast enough to see the future, while you would think that moving at light speed or faster you'd already be past the future into the farther future, and the future would be the past. But apparently their minds are either over-simplifying or they're just silly idiots. As for dust storms... er, Red Dwarf is a mining ship. Perhaps it can even withstand boring dust particles. Or even interesting ones."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 2:41 am
Here's one.
If a Hologram can move its own holoclothes (as seen when you take on the form of Kochanski) and using the method seen in Confusion and Paranoia, is it possible to make holoitems for a softlight hologram to hold? would these items only be soft light, or hard light?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 3:19 pm
Ok. I got one for ya. What, exactly, is a holowhip? Because in the episode where they encounter the holographic space ship (and Rimmer falls in love eek ) Lister threatens a holographic intruder with a holowhip stored in the munitions cabinet, implying that it is at least partially solid matter (so that a human can weild it) and can do damage to a hologram. However, in the episode where Rimmer gets a hologramatic virus and is driven insane (the source of all those wonderful comments about the king of the potato people), I'm fairly sure Rimmer at one point assaults Lister with a holowhip. It might just be my memory playing tricks as to episode and circumstance, but I am absolutely sure that Lister at some point gets hit by a hologram with a holowhip. This incident implies that a holowhip is a weapon that can be weilded by a hologram and do damage to a human (pretty much the complete opposite of what it is said to be in the first example). So which is it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
